Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mvf 3 Aps and ors Vs. M. Sivasamy and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order Pronounced on: April 02, 2013 R.P. No.628/2012 in CS(OS) No.599/2007 MVF 3 APS & ORS Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Binny Kalra, Ms.Tusha Malhtora and Mr.Aditya Gupta, Advs. versus M. SIVASAMY AND ORS Through ..... Defendants Mr.Arvind K.Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Shiva Lakshmi, Adv. for D-1, 3 & 5. Mr.Arvind K.Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sayan Ray, Adv. for D-4, 6, 7, & 8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide the Review Petition No.628/2012 filed by the defendants under Section 114 read with Section 151 CPC seeking review of the order dated 31st August, 2012 passed by this Court in I.A.No.10268/2009.2. The review petition is opposed by the plaintiffs by urging that no grounds averred in the said petition are available under the provisions of Order XLVII, Rule 1 or Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It is also stated tha...
Times Innovative Media Ltd. Vs. Delhi Transport Infrastructure Develop ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:20. 12.2012 % + Judgment delivered on:02. 04.2013 W.P.(C.) No. 3973/2012 TIMES INNOVATIVE MEDIA LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Mr. Diggaj Pathak & Mr. Atul Singh, Advocates. versus DELHI TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Najmi Waziri, Standing Counsel for the GNCTD with Ms. Neha Kapur & Mr. Nitin Saluja, Advocates for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. R. Vasanth & Ms. Taru Gupta, Advocates for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the award of contract for upgrade of 319 Bus Queue Shelters (hereinafter referred to as BQS for both singular and plural) and installation of BQS on 100 new locations across Delhi and for operating, maintaining & marketing advertis...
Philip David Dexter Vs. State Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: March 19, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 02, 2013 W.P.(CRL.) 1562/2012 PHILIP DAVID DEXTER Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Malhotra, Advocate with Mr.Rajat Bhalla, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Malavika Rajkotia, Advocate with Ms.Arpita Rai, Advocate for R-2 AND FAO 29/2013 DR NEETA MISRA Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Malavika Rajkotia, Advocate with Ms.Arpita Rai, Advocate versus PHILIP DAVID DEXTER Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Anil Malhotra, Advocate with Mr.Rajat Bhalla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.CM No. 1107/2013 in FAO No.29/2013 1. Since learned counsel for the parties had argued on the merits of their respective stands, we dispose of CM No.1107/2013 condoning the delay in filing FAO No.29/2013. FAO No.29/2013 and WP(Crl.) No.1562/2012 1. Dr.Neeta Misra, the app...
Kartar Vs. State of the Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 538/2011 Date of decision:2. d April, 2013 KARTAR Through ....Appellant Mr. Sumer Kumar Sethi, Advocate. Versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI .Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 539/2011 PAWAN KUMAR Through ....Appellant Ms. Nandita Rao, Advocate. Versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI .Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 561/2011 RAM KISHAN Through ....Appellant Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate. Versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI .Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 404/2013 RAJESH Through ....Appellant Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through .Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.:1. Kartar, Pawan Kumar, Ram kishan and Rajesh have preferred the instant appeals questioning their conviction und...
M/S Harjee Foods and anr Vs. M/S Barbino Enterprises Pvt Ltd. and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S (O.S) 473/2005 Date of Decision:02. 04.2013 M/S HARJEE FOODS & ANR Through: ....Plaintiffs Ms. Bitika Sharma with Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. Versus M/S BARBINO ENTERPRISES PVT LTD. & ANR ...Defendants Through: Nemo. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. This is a suit filed by the plaintiffs for permanent injunction, passing off, rendition of accounts, delivery-up and damages, with respect to the plaintiffs marks KIDO and KIDCO, allegedly being used by the defendants for confectionery items and sweets, candies, toffees, etc.2. The plaintiff no.1 is a registered partnership firm, which has been using the marks KIDO and KIDCO for wafers, biscuits, candy, confectionery, sweets, toffees and various other products since the year 1999. Plaintiff no.2, Mrs. Paramjeet Kaur, is the sole proprietress of SPS Sweets and was given permission in the year 2003, by plaintiff no.1, to use and manufacture under the mark KIDO. The mark K...
Yoginder Sharma Vs. Mangt. of Arvali Leasing Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 07.03.2013 Judgment delivered on:02. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 3802/2004 and C.M. No. 12023/2008 YOGINDER SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi, Ms. Anjali Chaturvedi & Mohd. Aqil Saifi, Advocates. versus MANGT. OF ARVALI LEASING LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Bajaj, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner workman has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the award made by the Labour Court-I, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in I.D. No. 489/1992, whereby the reference made to the Labour Court by the Appropriate Government on 24.05.1989 with regard to the termination of the petitioners service by the respondent management has been answered against the petitioner.2. The petitioner was appointed as a Clerk with the respondent management on 01.08.1985. His services were terminated on 27.09.1988. The terminati...
Gita Gupta Vs. Kailash Chand Dhingra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on :April 2nd, 2013 % + RC.REV. 578/2012 GITA GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.R.M.Sinha, Advocate versus KAILASH CHAND DHINGRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ganesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. By way of this revision petition filed under proviso to sub-section (8) of section 25(B) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), petitioner/tenant has challenged the order dated 12th September, 2012 passed by the ld.ARC, East Delhi District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby the leave to defend application filed by her in the eviction petition, has been rejected.2. An eviction petition under section 14(1)(e) read with section 25(B) of the Act was filed by the respondent herein i.e. owner wherein it is alleged that respondent is the owner/landlord of property no.E-4/17, Krishna Nagar and the petitioner herein i.e. respondent before the ld.ARC is his tenan...
National Highways Authority India Vs. Mecon-gea Energy Systems India L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: April 2, 2013 + OMP No.790/2012 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY INDIA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aljo K. Joseph and Mr.Amith Gupta, Advs. versus MECON - GEA ENERGY SYSTEMS INDIA LTD JV ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.A.P. Vinod, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I shall dispose of OMP No.790/2012 filed by the petitioner assailing the impugned order dated 20th August, 2011 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal by preferring an appeal under Section 37(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner and the respondent entered into a contract agreement dated 5th January, 2004 for the widening/ four laning and strengthening of the existing 2 lane carriageway of NH-47, including the bridges from Vytilla to Aroor Junction, totaling a d...
Om Prakash @ Omey and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 14, 2013 Pronounced on: April 02, 2013 + CRL.REV.P.710/2007 OM PRAKASH ALIAS OMEY & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeev Mehra and Ms. Shama Chaudhary, Advocates Versus STATE Through: ....Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT 1 Petitioners having faced trial in FIR No.63/2000 under Sections 365/304/279/201/34 of IPC registered at P.S. Dabri, Delhi, stand convicted by the trial court for the offence under Section 187 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 and have been awarded imprisonment for three months each with fine of `5,000/- each, which is assailed in this revision petition on the ground that at the final stage of trial, additional charge for the offence under Motor Vehicle Act,1988 was framed against petitioners and without affording opportunity to defend themselves, they have been convicted for the offence under Motor Vehicle Act by simply observing that...
Rajesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Honorary Joint Secretary, Afwwa and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % WP(C) No. 2710/1996 2nd April, 2013 RAJESH KUMAR & ORS. Through: ...... Petitioners Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocate. VERSUS HONORARY JOINT SECRETARY, AFWWA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Ritika, Advocate for R-2 and 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by twelve petitioners as per amended memo of parties dated 23.4.2009.2. The petitioners are employed by the respondents No. 1 and 2 as gardeners, sweepers and guards. In the writ petition, the following reliefs are claimed :(a) A writ of Certiorary to respondents to regularise the employment of the petitioners. (b) To issue any writ directions of order to the respondents to frame proper rules governing the appointment salaries, increment, promotion, provident fund, pension, leave, medical, housing, etc. WP(C) 2710/1996 Page 1 (c) To issue any writ direction or order prohibiting the respo...
- ‹ Prev
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- Next ›
- Last »