Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Develoment Authrity Vs. M/S Anant Raj Agencies
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
$~R1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:03.4.2013 FAO(OS) 35/2008 DELHI DEVELOMENT AUTHRITY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. versus M/S ANANT RAJ AGENCIES ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellant (DDA) is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 13.3.2007 wherein the objections filed by it under Section 30 and 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) against the Award dated 02.11.1998 of the sole Arbitrator Mr.L.R.Pahwa had been modified only to the extent that qua item No.29 of Claim No.1 an amount of Rs.1,88,220/- was ordered to be deducted. The remaining amounts awarded under the three heads were sustained. 2 Record shows that the appellant and the respondent had entered into a contract whereby the respondent had undertaken construction of 8314 houses in Sector-XV, Rohini as also constr...
Sita Ram Aggrawal Vs. Punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 541/1990 3rd April, 2013 SITA RAM AGGRAWAL Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Apurb lal and Mr. Daleep Singh, Advocates. VERSUS PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Raaj Birbal, Senior Advocate and Ms. Raavi Birbal, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by one Sh. Sita Ram Aggrawal, an employee of the respondent-bank. The petitioner, who was Civil Engineer, was appointed as a Manager(Civil) by the respondent-bank. On 29.3.1988, interviews were to be held for promotion to the post of Senior Manager (Civil) from the post of Manager in which the petitioner was working. The petitioner claims that he was bound to be promoted through the interview exercise which was conducted on 29.3.1988 inasmuch as the respondent-bank wrongly considered the unsatisfactory ACR for the year 1987 because this ACR of the year 1987 was...
Shiv NaraIn Mishra Vs. the G.M. Uco Bank Head Office (Pad) Calcutta W. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7612/2009 & CM No. 4157/2012 3rd April, 2013 % SHIV NARAIN MISHRA Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. R.K.Shukla, Advocate. VERSUS THE G.M. UCO BANK HEAD OFFICE (PAD) CALCUTTA W.B. ...... Respondent Through: Mr. C.M.Manaktala, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. In this writ petition filed by the petitioner, Shiv Narain Mishra, two reliefs are claimed- one is for grant of pension and second is for payment of interest for the delay in release of the retiral benefits to the petitioner. I may note that the petitioner has expired during the pendency of the petition and is now represented by his legal heirs.2. So far as the issue of pension is concerned an employee would be granted pension if the employee would have exercised such an option. The petitioner claims that the petitioner had exercised the option in terms of a form which has been filed as Annexure P-5...
Parveen Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : April 03, 2013 + W.P.(C) 477/2012 PARVEEN KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Pankaj Batra, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Navratn Chaudhary, Advocate with SI Sri Bhagwan. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On February 20, 2009 the Commissioner of Police, Delhi got issued an advertisement inviting applications to fill up 6141 posts of Male Constables in Delhi indicating that 3101 posts were unreserved, 1658, 921 and 461 posts were reserved for OBC, SC and ST candidates respectively. It was further indicated that in each category 10% posts would be reserved for ex-servicemen.2. As per Standing Order No.212/2008 merit list had to include names of candidates 20% over and above the number of vacancies notified, but select list prepared was of 6331 candidates.3. 5811 candida...
Haq Through Its Member Abdul Shakeel Vs. Dda and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2029/2012 HAQ THROUGH ITS MEMBER ABDUL SHAKEEL ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Jayshree Satpute, Adv. versus DDA AND ANR. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sangram Patnaik, Mr. Umesh Yadav and Mr. Swaym Siddha, Advs. for R-1/DDA CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 03.04.2013 W.P.(C) 2029/2012 & CM Nos.4365/2012 (interim relief), and 9898/2012 (providing monetary compensation) The case of the petitioner NGO working for the welfare of slum dwellers, is that about 1000 families of farmer community are living and working on the banks of Yamuna for many years and they have erected temporary thatch huts there and they move to higher ground when the fields are flooded. This is also the case of the petitioner that Delhi Development Authority has periodically demolished the temporary constructions on the aforesaid land, but has not taken any step for their rehabilitation. The petitioner has claimed the following rel...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Sandeep Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : April 03, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2633/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate. versus SANDEEP YADAV Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Respondent Sandeep Yadav filed OA No.3811/2010 challenging orders dated January 29, 2009 and February 04, 2009 requiring him to deposit two months salary in lieu of notice pertaining to his technical resignation from service and `75,437/- towards capitation charges.2. His grievance against the two orders was that having joined service as a Constable with the Delhi Police on August 09, 2007 he got selected as a Primary Teacher in MCD in the month of October 2007. After processing his case further, Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) forwarded his name to MCD which offered him appointment in the month of J...
Rajendra Nath Chopra and ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :6. h FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :3. d APRIL, 2013 + CRL.A. 175/1994 RAJENDRA NATH CHOPRA & ORS Through : ..... Appellants Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.Shamikh, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. R.N.Chopra, V.K.Chopra, Smt.Subhashna Chopra & V.K.Kalra were arrested in Sessions Case No. 136/1989 arising out of FIR No.239/1989 PS Kirti Nagar and were challened to the Court for Trial on the allegations that on or before 12.07.1989 they harassed and maltreated Kamal Chopra, legally wedded wife of V.K.Chopra on account of dowry demands during her stay at the matrimonial home at 7/204, Ramesh Nagar, Delhi. On 12.07.1989 at about 10.00 A.M. Kamal Chopra committed suicide. During the course of investigation, Mr.V.K.Jain, SDM recorded statement of the deceaseds father and lodged First Information Report. Post-mortem examination on the body of the...
Yashwant Kumar JaIn Vs. Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
Dr. Dharam Paul Sharma, Member (J): 1. Consequent upon a departmental inquiry, the applicant was awarded the penalty of removal from service vide order dated 29.7.2009, as at Annexure A-1. The same was confirmed by the appellate authority vide its order dated 9.6.2010, as at Annexure A-2. The Revision Petition filed there against was also dismissed vide order dated 2.6.2011, as at Annexure A-3. All these orders are being challenged in the present Original Application with a prayer that the applicant be declared to be in service with all consequential benefits, including back wages from the date of dismissal from service. 2. The applicant while working as UDC was issued a charge sheet vide Memorandum dated 9.4.2009 vide which following article of charges were framed against him:- ARTICLE-I Shri Y.K. Jain while posted as Upper Division Clerk in the office of the Deputy Narcotics Commissioner, Neemuch was restrained from entering other chamber/sections of the office vide order F.No.II(39)...
Sapna Tyagi Vs. Secretary (Defence) and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL) 1837/2010 SAPNA TYAGI Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Y.S.Tyagi, Adv. versus SECRETARY (DEFENCE) & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ankur Chibber, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR ORDER % 02.04.2013 By this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks issuance of an order/ direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to act in accordance with the established procedure of law as laid under Section 4 of the Code of criminal Procedure. Counsel for the petitioner submits that under Section 101 of the Army Act 1950, for any offence, it is the duty of the Army to take the offender into the military custody and then the decision is to be taken that whether the matter should be referred to the police for investigation or to be inquired by the Army itself. Counsel further submits that the kidney of the husband of the pet...
Romani Singh Vs. Lt.Col.Vivek Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:April 2, 2013 CONT.CAS (C) 178/2012 ROMANI SINGH ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Geeta Luthra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Ashly Cherian, Mr.Harish Malik, Advocates versus LT.COL.VIVEK SINGH ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.V.Shekhar, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Namita Roy, Mr.Piyush Jain, Ms.Shaveta Chaudhary, Mr.Amit Chobey & Mr.Jatin Rajput, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.For orders see FAO No.39/2012. (VEENA BIRBAL) JUDGE (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG) JUDGE April 2, 2013 ssb/kks...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »