Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madhu Karna Vs. Medical Council of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 569/2012 MADHU KARNA ..... Appellant Through:Mr.Sandeep Kapoor, Mr.Ankit Kapoor & Ms.Yaranica Kapoor, Advocates along with appellants in person. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through:Mr.Ashish Kumar, Advocate for respondent/MCI. Mr.Praveen Khattar, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr.Saurabh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. + LPA 707/2012 AVNINDRA GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sandeep Kapoor, Mr.Ankit Kapoor & Ms.Yaranica Kapoor, Advocates along with appellants in person. versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ORS ..... Respondents Thourgh: Mr.Ashish Kumar, Advocate for respondent/MCI. Mr.Praveen Khattar, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr.Saurabh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 1. 09.04.2013 On 10.9.2007, respondent No.3 brought his daughter Baby Kanak, aged about 2 years to Centre for Sight, with complaint of right eye squinting. Dr.Ma...
Smt. Prem Rani and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2236/2013 SMT. PREM RANI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashok K.Mahapatra, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jatan Singh, Central Govt.Standing Counsel with Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The Petitioners in the present writ petition, inter alia, pray as follows:(a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No.1 to take the custody of the suit land measuring 30929 sq. yds. situated in the revenue estate of Jhandewalan Mandir and further direct that Union of India can cancel the nazul agreement under Clause 12 of the Agreement and take the land from the custody of DDA as well as Respondents No.3 and 4 to protect the said land and the ...
Avnindra Gupta Vs. Medical Council of India ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 569/2012 MADHU KARNA ..... Appellant Through:Mr.Sandeep Kapoor, Mr.Ankit Kapoor & Ms.Yaranica Kapoor, Advocates along with appellants in person. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through:Mr.Ashish Kumar, Advocate for respondent/MCI. Mr.Praveen Khattar, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr.Saurabh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. + LPA 707/2012 AVNINDRA GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sandeep Kapoor, Mr.Ankit Kapoor & Ms.Yaranica Kapoor, Advocates along with appellants in person. versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ORS ..... Respondents Thourgh: Mr.Ashish Kumar, Advocate for respondent/MCI. Mr.Praveen Khattar, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr.Saurabh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 1. 09.04.2013 On 10.9.2007, respondent No.3 brought his daughter Baby Kanak, aged about 2 years to Centre for Sight, with complaint of right eye squinting. Dr.Ma...
Union of India Vs. Pk Srivastava
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2013
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 195/2011 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. S.K. Dubey, Advocate PK SRIVASTAVA ..... Respondent Through: respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 09.04.2013 Vide application dated 26.3.2008, the respondent Dr. P.K. Srivastava sought certain information under Right to Information Act, 2005. On not receiving any response, he made a complaint in this regard to the Central Information Commission. The desired information, however, came to be supplied to the respondent vide letter dated 9.10.2009. It was complained by the respondent that had the desired information been supplied to him in time, he would have convinced the Ministry of Textile and Central Silk Board to induct and give him in situ promotion to him to the post of Scientist-D with effect from 30.8.2006 and the delay in furnishing of the said information by CPIO, DoPT, Government of India had caused irreversible l...
Deep Chand Vs. N.D.M.C
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 26/2013 DEEP CHAND ..... Appellant Through: versus N.D.M.C. ..... Respondent Through:Ms.Saroj Bidawat and AS.Tuisem Shimray, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER 09 04.2013 % Vide order dated 29/30th August 1968, the appellant was appointed as Operation Theatre Assistant. Vide order dated 9.12.1974, in Victoria Zanana Hospital of MCD, he was confirmed on the aforesaid post, with effect from 1.4.1972. The next promotional post available to the appellant was of O.T. Technician. The appellant was given current duty charge of the post of O.T. Technician with effect from 16.5.1979 and vide order dated 20.1.1984, he was regularized on the post of O.T. Technician. Vide order dated 13.2.1984, LPA 26/2013 page 1 of 4 the appellant was given current duty charge of the post of Technical Assistant (OT). This was followed by an order dated 11.6.1991 promoting him to the post of Technical Assistant (OT) on ...
R.K. Associates and Hoteliers Pvt Ltd Vs. Aircel Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: April 02, 2013 Judgment delivered on: April 09, 2013 + Arb.P.No.339/2012 R.K.ASSOCIATES & HOTELIERS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Adv. versus AIRCEL LIMITED Through ..... Respondent Mr.Mayank Jain, Adv. with Mr.Parmatma Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide the present petition filed by the petitioner under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has made his submissions without filing the reply.3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner-Company is engaged mainly in the business of Railway Catering, Hospitality and Hotel Business along with advertising business in the Railways. In November, 2010 the respondent approached the petitioner and expressed its desire to advertise its brand by way of commercial slides, voice by making ...
Commissioner of Income Tax-vi Vs. Times Business Solution Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 04.2013 ITA No. 209/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ... Appellant versus TIMES BUSINESS SOLUTION LTD. ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Sanjeev Rajpal : None CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal by the revenue is directed against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 31.08.2012 in ITA No. 629/Del/2012 pertaining to the assessment year 2007-08. The assessing officer had disallowed a sum of `. 3,63,31,532/- which had been shown by the assessee as bad debts written off.2. The assessee company, consequent upon a scheme of demerger under section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, had acquired all the assets and liabilities of two web based portals that were hitherto being operated by the assessees holding company. Those web based portals were acquired as going c...
Daulat Ram and ors. Vs. National Open School and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 3789/2010 9th April, 2013 DAULAT RAM & ORS. Through: ...... Petitioners. Ms. Rachna Joshi Issar and Ms. Ambreen Rasool, Advocates. VERSUS NATIONAL OPEN SCHOOL & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. S.Rajappa, Adv. and Dr. Puran Chand, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by six petitioners. In the writ petition, the following reliefs are claimed:(i) issue an appropriate writ, directing the respondent to consider the case of the petitioners for regular employment, and quash the order dated 1-5-2009 (Annexure P 5 Supra) AND (ii) W.P.(C) 3789/2010 directs the respondent to give employment to the petitioners at its regional centres in terms of order dated 9-9-2002 (Annexure P1 Supra) Page 1 of 6 AND (iii) 2. pass such order/s as may be deemed fit and proper. A reference to the reliefs whi...
Quasim Ali Vs. Additional Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL. REV. P. NO.661/2007 Date of Decision:09. h April, 2013 + # ! QUASIM ALI ....Petitioner Through: None Versus $ * ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS Respondent Through: Mr.Biswajit Bhatacharaya, ASG, Mr. Sumant De, Advocate for contemnor Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate for respt. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: By way of this revision petition filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner-convict had sought setting aside of the judgment dated 29th October, 2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the appeal filed by him against the judgment dated 27th February, 2002 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate holding him guilty for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act and the order dated 2nd March,2002 sentencing him to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment and fin...
Hasibul Rehman Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 04.2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.935/2011 HASIBUL REHMAN Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant Hasibul Rehman by the impugned judgment dated 7th December, 2010 has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for committing the murder of Tarikul on 19th February, 2007. By order of sentence dated 15th December, 2010, the appellant has been sentenced to life imprisonment along with a fine of `15,000/-. In default of payment of fine, the appellant is to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.2. On the question of involvement of the appellant in the occurrence on 19th February, 2007, we feel that there is sufficient evidence in view of the testimonies of three eye witnesses...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »