Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.C.D. Vs. Oxford Senior Sec. School and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
$~ 40-47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2064/2012 % Judgment dated 10.04.2013 M.C.D. ..... Petitioner Ms.Amita Gupta and Mr.P.Kumar, Advs Through: versus OXFOR SENIOR SEC. SCHOOL & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.B.B. Jain, Advocate for respondents + W.P.(C) 2065/2012 M.C.D. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Amita Gupta and Mr.P.Kumar, Advs versus OXFORD SENIOR SEC. SCHOOL & AN ..... Respondent Through: Mr.B.B. Jain, Advocate for respondents + W.P.(C) 2067/2012 M.C.D. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Amita Gupta and Mr.P.Kumar, Advs versus OXFORD SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL ..... Respondent Through: Mr.B.B. Jain, Advocate for respondents + W.P.(C) 2068/2012 MCD ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Amita Gupta and Mr.P.Kumar, Advs versus OXFORD SENIOR SEC.SCHOOL,VIKAS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.B.B. Jain, Advocate for respondents + W.P.(C) 2111/2012 M.C.D. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Amita Gupta and Mr.P.Kumar, Advs versus OXFORD SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL ..... Respondent Through: Mr....
Manohar Singh and anr. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 14, 2013 Pronounced on: April 10, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 1952/2009 MANOHAR SINGH & ANR. Through: .....Petitioners Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Mr. Snehansu Tripathi, Ms. Bharti Tripathi, Mr. B.N.Sharma & Mr. Sudhanshu Pali, Advocates Versus STATE & ORS Through: + ....Respondents Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for RespondentState with ASI Virender Singh, PS Mehrauli and HC Ishwar Chand, PS Hauz Khas, Delhi Mr. S.K. Rungta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pratiti Rungta and Mr. Prashant Singh, Advocates for Respondents No.8, 9 & 11 to 14 Mr. Som Dutta Sharma and Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocates for Respondents No.6 and 7 CRL. M.C. 1959/2009 MANOHAR SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Mr. Snehansu Tripathi, Ms. Bharti Tripathi, Mr. B.N.Sharma & Mr. Sudhanshu Pali, Advocates Versus STATE & ORS. Through: Crl. M.C. Nos.1952/2009 &1959/2009 ....Respondents Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for RespondentPag...
Jai Prakash Gupta Vs. the Commandant Crpf and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
$-9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No.3679/2012 Date of decision :10. h April, 2013 % JAI PRAKASH GUPTA Through : ..... PETITIONER Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate. versus THE COMMANDANT CRPF & ANR...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Saqib, Adv. with Mr. R.S. Tyagi, Deputy Commandant CRPF. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner Constable Jai Prakash Gupta who is working with the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) complaining that his mother Smt. Kusum Devi was dependent upon him and was entitled to medical facilities as his dependent from Government hospitals as well as the empanelled hospitals as per the list issued by the respondents. It is also claimed by the petitioner that he is entitled to reimbursement of medical bills with regard to the treatment given to his mother on account of such dependency. The petitioner has placed reliance on a government mem...
Khem Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :10. h April, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4775/2012 KHEM SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Col. (Retd.) S.R. Kalkal, Advocate versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Yadav, Advocate for Mr.Ravinder Agarwal, CGSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction for quashing an order dated 1.8.2008 and a further order dated 13.09.2011 complaining that both of them are arbitrary and were made without application of mind.2. The petitioner joined the Army on 28.12.1987. He was posted with the 6th Battalion Kumaon Regiment on completion of his basic military training. He was apparently promoted to the rank of Hawaldar on 14.02.2004. The petitioner was alleged to have committed an act of misconduct inasmuch as on 24.06.2008, he had an altercation with another Army personnel, who was in-charge of the Mechanical Transport Platoon of th...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Hari Om Kaushik and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. h April, 2013 MAC.APP. 683/2011 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradyot Pravash and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advs. versus HARI OM KAUSHIK & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashok Popli, Adv. for R1 and R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 04.05.2011 passed by the ld. Tribunal, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation against the appellant and in favour of the respondents / claimants as under:1. Loss of dependency (Rs.7875 x 12 x16) 2. For Funeral Expenses 3. For Loss of Love and Affection 4. For loss of consortium 5. For Loss of Estate 2. Rs. 15,12,000/Rs. 10,000/Rs. 1,25,000/Rs. 10,000/Rs. 10,000/- Instant appeal has been filed mainly on the ground that ld. Tribunal has erred in not considering the provision provided under Section 149 (2)(a) (i) (c) that no sum shall be payable by an in...
N.R.Dogra Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 1813/1997 10th April, 2013 N.R.DOGRA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Anil Kumar Verma and Ms. Ashu Rani, Advocate. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-Sh. N.R.Dogra seeking the relief that he should be granted Selection Grade in terms of the Presidential order dated 26.11.1971. In sum and substance what the petitioner claims is that though the Presidential order dated 26.11.1971 applied only to teachers and though, the petitioner was only a Librarian and not a teacher, he is yet included in category-4 of para-3 of the Presidential order dated 26.11.1971. It is contended that category-4 includes therein not only Trained Graduate Teachers but others in the same scales and the petitioner is in the same scales category. Reliance on behalf of the petitioner is i...
Pitam Jankalyan Samiti Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5329/2012 PITAM JANKALYAN SAMITI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Deb Nandan, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajiv Nanda and Ms Shawna, Advs. for Respondents 1,2 and 4 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER 10 04.2013 % This petition in public interest has been filed by Pitam Jankalyan Samiti, alleging construction of boundary wall on public land comprising Khasra No. 103/23-24 of Village Karala. It is alleged in the petition that respondent No. 3, who was earlier posted as SDM in connivance with the land grabbers, allowed construction of boundary wall upon public land by one Dr. Krishna Kumari Thakran. When a complaint of illegal construction of public land and its grabbing was made, respondent No. 3 cancelled the permission granted by him. The petitioner has, therefore, sought a direction to the respondents to remove encroachment on the aforesaid public land.2. I...
Mr. Rahul Chadha and ors. Vs. Summer Field School and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.1128/2010 % April 10, 2013 MR. RAHUL CHADHA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate. versus SUMMER FIELD SCHOOL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by petitioners whose wards are studying in respondent No.1-school. The only issue requiring decision in this case is as to whether a private recognized unaided school is entitled to ask fees for more than one month together i.e can a private recognized unaided school charge fees in advance for more than one month at one point of time.2. It is undisputed that the respondent No.1-school is governed by the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 and the Rules framed thereunder. The aspect of fees to be paid by the students is the subject matter of Chapter XIII Part B of the Delhi Sch...
The Director General of Works Vs. Regional Labour Commissioner and ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:05.03.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:10. 04.2013 % + LPA 622/2001 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF WORKS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sewa Ram, Advocate. versus REGIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik with Ms. Amita Kalkal and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT 1 The appellant challenges a judgment and order dated 25.09.2001 of the learned Single Judge in WP (C) 5471/2000 which dismissed its Writ Petition. The appellant had sought to challenge the recovery notice pursuant to a certificate issued by the Central Labour Commissioner, demanding deposit in the sum of Rs.4,84,19,918/-.2. The facts of the case are that the Supreme Court by its judgment in Surender Singh v. CPWD, reported as AIR 198.SC 584.directed payment to daily wagers in the Central Public Works Department, (CPWD) with effect from their init...
Union of India Vs. S.K. Viz
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order Delivered on: April 10, 2013 + OMP No.783/2011 UNION OF INDIA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Abhik Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Y. Rajesh Kumar Naidu, Adv. and Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. versus S.K. VIZ ..... Respondent Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A.No.16770/2011 (for condonation of delay of 184 days in re-filing the petition) 1. The abovementioned objections petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, called the Act) against the Award dated 14th February, 2011 passed by the sole Arbitrator Mr.S.M. Chopra.2. Along with the petition, the petitioner filed an application under Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay of 184 days in re-filing the petition. The only ground for such delay stated in the application is that after filing of the petition on 6th July, 2011, the registry put the objection and returned the petition. In the meant...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »