Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Kishan Gupta Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2013
$~5 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 16143/2006 RAM KISHAN GUPTA ..... Petitioner versus UOI & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajender Agarwal For the Respondent : Mr Pradeep K. Shukla with Ms Saakshi Agrawal for R-1/UOI Mr Amol Sinha with Mr Deepak Anand, Mr Anshum Jain and Mr Rahul Kochar for revenue CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) By way of this petition, a writ of mandamus is sought against the respondents for release of the amount of interest on a sum of `5,35,000/which was seized from the business premises of the petitioner during the search and seizure operation conducted on 17.03.1985. The said amount of `5,35,000/- was returned to the petitioner on 17.02.2000 but without any interest thereon. WP(C)16143 /2006 Central Board of Direct Taxes on 11.11.05 wherein he claimed that interest on the said amoun...
Abdul Khaliq Vs. Razia Begum
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :19. h March, 2013 DECIDED ON :11. h April, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 745/2012 & CRL.M.A.Nos.2624/2012 & 1698/2013 ABDUL KHALIQ ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.S.D.Ansari, Advocate with Mr.I.Ahmed, Advocate. Versus RAZIA BEGUM ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Ajay M.Lal, Advocate. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Petitioner-Abdul Khaliq has filed the petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of order dated 20.12.2010 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate and order dated 23.01.2012 of learned Addl.Sessions Judge confirming the order dated 20.12.2010.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record. At this juncture, the petitioner is aggrieved of the quantum of interim maintenance @ `10,000/- granted to the respondent by the courts below. It reveals that earlier vide order dated 04.04.2009 the learned Metropolitan Magistrate granted maintenance @ ...
S.M.V. Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Cross Country Heritage Hotel and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h April, 2013. + CS(OS) 281/2010 & I.A. No.2055/2010 (u/O 3.R-1 & 2 CPC) S.M.V. AGENCIES PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Gagan Gupta and Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Advocates. Versus M/S. CROSS COUNTRY HERITAGE HOTEL & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Pradeep Diwan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anupam, Mr. Desh Raj and Mr. Pradeep Desodiya, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGMENT % 11.04.2013 I.A. No.6070/2011 (of defendants for leave to defend) 1. The plaintiff has sued under Order 37 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), 1908 for recovery of Rs.68 lakhs with interest @ 12% per annum pleading: (i) that a document titled Basis of Negotiation was executed on 5th February, 2007 between the plaintiff on the one hand and defendant No.1 through its Managing Director defendant No.2 on the other hand, whereunder the defendant No.2 offered to transfer 52% of the share capital held by him in the defendant No.1 and the pla...
ismaeli Devi and ors. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2013
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS) 120/2012 Date of Decision:11. h April, 2013. ISMAELI DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mr. Kamal Mehta with Mr. Vijay Kumar, Mr. Brijesh Oberoi & Mr. Sudeep Singh, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The appellants are aggrieved by an impugned order dated 15 th October, 2012, whereby their suit for declaration for title and other reliefs was dismissed. The learned Single Judge had invoked the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC to hold that in view of the terms contained in Section 15 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971, the suit was not maintainable. The learned Single Judge placed reliance on his previous decision in another case, titled as DCM Ltd....
Jhilmil Breckenridge Vs. Douglas Breckenridge
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 04.2013 CONT. APP. (C) No. 10/2012 JHILMIL BRECKENRIDGE ... Appellant ... Respondent Versus DOUGLAS BRECKENRIDGE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Ms Indira Jai Singh, Sr Advocate with Mr Jai Bansal, Ms Sonam Anand and Mr Pushpendra Singh : Mr Prosenjeet Banerjee with Ms Liza M. Baruah CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal has been filed under section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 inasmuch as the appellant is aggrieved by the judgment dated 21.02.2012 delivered by a learned single Judge of this court whereby the appellant has been found guilty of committing contempt of court. In particular, the learned single Judge found the appellant guilty of disobeying the orders dated 30.09.2010 and 05.04.2011 passed by the learned Guardianship court by allegedly removing the child Liam from the ...
Jagdish Chander Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2013
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 193/2013 JAGDISH CHANDER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. B.S. Mor with Mr. Neeraj Mor, Advs. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi Priya, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER 11 04.2013 % The appellant before us was employed as a conductor with the respondent-DTC. On 6.3.1994, the Vigilance Team of the DTC found three ticketless passengers travelling in the bus in which the appellant was on duty. On inquiry, the said team found that though the passengers had paid Rs.13/- each as fare to the appellant, he had failed to issue the requisite tickets to them. The statements of the passengers were recorded in the presence of the appellant, who also signed the said statements, without any protest of qualification. Pursuant thereto, a charge-sheet was delivered to the appellant on 25.4.1994. He submitted a reply dated 16.5.1994. Since the respondent was not satisfied with the...
Bhalley Ram Vs. Agricultural Produce Market Committee
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2013
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 196/2013 BHALLEY RAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Sachin Sharma and Mr. Atul Nagaraj, Advs with appellant in person versus AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 11.04.2013 CM 5386/2013 & 5388/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. CM 5387/2013 (delay) The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. LPA 196/2013 Vide order dated 23.9.1994, the services of the appellant, who was at that time working as a Safai Karamchari with the respondent were terminated. Aggrieved from the termination of his service, the appellant raised an industrial dispute which was referred to the Labour Court for adjudication. Vide award dated 10.4.2003, the Labour Court directed reinstatement of the appellant with continuity in...
Kartar Singh Vs. Gnct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: April 11, 2013 + WP(C) 16867/2006 KARTAR SINGH Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.S.C.Luthra, Advocate. versus GNCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) CM No.18020/2012 It is agreed that the writ petition could be heard today itself. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as not pressed. W.P.(C) No.16867/2006 1. The charge against the petitioner reads as under:It has been reported that on 30.07.2000 Sh.Kartar Singh, Warder, Roll No.466 while performing his duty in Jail No.2 from 2:00 PM to 10:00 PM, committed misconduct in as much as at about 4.30 PM started abusing Sh. Mahavir Singh, DS-I, in his absence at Chakkar, in the presence of Sh. Om Prakash, AS (Internal) and Sh. Inder Bahadur, Chief Head Warder. Thereafter again on 02-08-2000 said Sh. Kartar Singh, Warder 466 came in...
Anjani Kumar Singh Vs. Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.6445/2012 % April 11, 2013 ANJANI KUMAR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner None. versus MINISTRY OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Saqib, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Ranjan Mazumdar, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking employment with the respondent No.1/Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Government of India. Further relief prayed in this petition is that respondents be directed to pay back wages with interest and all consequential benefits to the petitioner.2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner pleads that he was working with respondent No.1 since 6.6.2000, though the salary was being paid by the respondent No.2/M/s. National Informatics Centre Services Inc. Petitioner claims that he has worked for about ten years an...
Banwari Lal Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : April 05, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : April 11, 2013 + WP(C) 407/2011 RAM SINGHASAN Represented by: .....Petitioner Ms.Avnish Ahlawat and Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Jatan Singh, Advocate for R-1. Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate for R-2 to R-4. WP(C) 4709/2011 BANWARI LAL .....Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat and Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Ms.Shawana Bari and Mr.Anas Tanvir, Advocates for R-2 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The above-captioned two writ petitions challenge the judgment and order dated January 06, 2010 passed in OA No.2769/2008 and OA No.2770/2008, dismissing both Original Applications filed by Ct.Banwari Lal and Ct.Ram Singhasan.2. Fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »