Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Uoi and anr. Vs. Kl Taneja and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: April 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 12, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8102/2012 UOI & ANR. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha, Mr.R.N.Singh and Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates. versus KL TANEJA AND ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Mahabir Singh, Sr. Advocate instructed by Mr.Sat Pal Singh and Mr.Rakesh Dahiya, Advocates. AND + W.P.(C) 20/2013 UOI & ANR. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha, Mr.R.N.Singh and Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates. versus KL GOYAL & ORS. Represented by: AND + ..... Respondents Mr.Mahabir Singh, Sr. Advocate instructed by Mr.Sat Pal Singh and Mr.Rakesh Dahiya, Advocates. W.P.(C) 99/2013 UOI & ANR. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha, Mr.R.N.Singh and Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates. versus PK UDGATA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Mahabir Singh, Sr. Advocate instructed by Mr.Sat Pal Singh and Mr.Rakesh Dahiya, Advocates. AND + W.P.(C) 104/2013 UOI & ANR. Represented by: .......
Arun Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 04.2013 CUS.A.A. 7/2010 BASUDEV GARG ... Appellant ... Respondents ... Appellant ... Respondents ... Appellant ... Respondents ... Appellant ... Respondents versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND + CUS.A.A. 10/2010 & CM No. 21740/2010 ARUN GUPTA versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS + AND CUS.A.A. 12/2010 & CM No. 21751/2010 ANIL GOEL versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS + AND CUS.A.A. 13/2010 & CM No. 21754/2010 ANIL GOEL versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants For the Respondent : Mr C.Hari Shankar and Sh. S.Sunil. : Mr.Kamal Nijhawan, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr.Sumit Gaur, Advocate. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J 1.These appeals are directed against the order dated 15th March, 2010 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. In all these appeals, the common issue that has been sou...
Bharat Electronic Technical Cadre Association and an Vs. Union of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 1851/2013 12th April , 2013 BHARAT ELECTRONIC TECHNICAL CADRE ASSOCIATION & ANR. ......Petitioners Through: Mr. D.K.Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Suryakant Singla and Ms. Shagun Anirudh, Advocates. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh and Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the employees of the respondent no.3- corporation. The respondent no.3-corporation-Bharat Electronics Ltd. is shown in the memo of parties to be represented through its registered office at Bangalore. Petitioners, admittedly, are serving the respondent no.3 not at Delhi but at Ghaziabad, where they also reside.2. By means of this writ petition, following reliefs are claimed:(i) Issue a writ of certiorari or in the nature of certiorari or any other writ, order or directions the...
Gail (India) Ltd. Vs. Fibcom India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: April 12, 2013 + OMP.No.1192/2012 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. Through .....Petitioner Mr.Rajiv Bansal, Adv. versus FIBCOM INDIA LTD. Through .....Respondent Mr.S.K. Maniktala, Adv .with Mr.N.K.Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. By this order I propose to decide the present petition filed under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.2. The disputes between the parties were referred for adjudication to Mr.Justice Anil Dev Singh (Retd.) as an independent Arbitrator. After completion of pleadings, the respondent filed affidavit by way of evidence of its witness namely Mr.Sachin Kumar, working as Assistant General Manager with the respondent.3. The examination-in-chief of the said witness was recorded before the learned Arbitrator on 12th December, 2011.4. The said witness Mr.Sachin Kumar was cross examined on 20th January, 2012, 29th February, 2012 and 19th April, 2012. W...
Indian Council of Medical Research Vs. Kv Ratanakar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: April 12, 2013 + W.P.(C) 172/2012 INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Neha Bhatnagar, Advocate versus KV RATANAKAR & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sudhir Kulshreshtha, Advocate for R-1. Ms.Anindita Popli, Advocate for Mr.S.Aravinder, Advocate for applicant in CM No.6039/2012. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.379/2012 (Addl.documents) Allowed. WP(C)172/2012 1. Issue which arose for consideration before the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.1308/2007 filed by K.V.Ratanakar was whether upon rationalization of scale of pay of the Library Staff requiring Librarian to be placed in the pay scale `2000-3500 (then current scale held by them being `1400-2300) would amount to promotion. The issue arose in the context of the ACP Scheme then in vogue requiring first financial upgradation if within 12 ...
Anil Goel Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 04.2013 CUS.A.A. 7/2010 BASUDEV GARG ... Appellant ... Respondents ... Appellant ... Respondents ... Appellant ... Respondents ... Appellant ... Respondents versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND + CUS.A.A. 10/2010 & CM No. 21740/2010 ARUN GUPTA versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS + AND CUS.A.A. 12/2010 & CM No. 21751/2010 ANIL GOEL versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS + AND CUS.A.A. 13/2010 & CM No. 21754/2010 ANIL GOEL versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants For the Respondent : Mr C.Hari Shankar and Sh. S.Sunil. : Mr.Kamal Nijhawan, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr.Sumit Gaur, Advocate. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J 1.These appeals are directed against the order dated 15th March, 2010 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. In all these appeals, the common issue that has been sou...
Naveen Sangari Vs. Escorts Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h April, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.2403/2010 NAVEEN SANGARI Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R.S. Mittal, Adv. Versus ESCORTS LTD. Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Simran Mehta & Ms. Yogita Sunaria, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The plaintiff has instituted this suit under Order 37 of the CPC for recovery of Rs.53,06,208/- together with interest at the rate of 15% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till realization, pleading: (i) that the plaintiff served the defendant Company for 27 years in different capacities and ultimately resigned on 14.12.2007; (ii) that the plaintiff in the resignation letter dated 14.12.2007 as well as subsequently requested the defendant to settle his employment dues but the same have not been settled; (iii) the details of employment dues as on 30.09.2010 are as under: Monthly Package Basi...
Jayabrata Bhattacharjee Vs. Ashok Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C)386/2009 Date of Pronouncement 12th April, 2013 % JAYABRATA BHATTACHARJEE ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J 1.A contempt petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 was filed by the petitioner, for initiating contempt of Court proceedings against the respondents for not complying with the order passed by this Court in CWP 1808/1994 dated 23.7.1999, which was upheld by the Supreme Court of India on 13.12.2007. The said contempt petition was disposed of by a judgment dated 13.7.2012. Detailed facts have been noticed in the judgment. The concluding portion of the judgment reads as under:39. In my view DDA has in fact wilfully disobeyed the order of the High Court, as confirmed by the Supreme Court of India. Assuming if the DDA was under the impression that there ar...
M/S National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S Progressive-mvr(Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: April 12, 2013 + OMP No.155/2011 M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Arun Kumar Varma, Adv. with Ms.Mansi Wadhera & Mr.Ashish Bansal, Advs. versus M/S PROGRESSIVE-MVR(JV) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Amit George, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the award dated 25th October, 2010.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner awarded contract for execution of works of four laning from kms. 480+00 to Kms. 520+00 of Gopalganj Muzzafarpur Section of NH-28 in the state of Bihar vide letter dated 8th July, 2005.3. A formal contract agreement was signed on 24th August, 2005.4. It is stated by the petitioner that the entire work under the said contract was divided into various items forming...
Tej Singh Vs. President Service Institute
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 217/2013 TEJ SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. G.K. Srivastava, Adv. versus PRESIDENT SERVICE INSTITUTE Through: ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN % 1. ORDER 12 04.2013 The appellant before us was working with the respondent/President Service Institute and was posted as Driver in a bus of the said Institute. On 20 th April, 2005, when the bus being driven by the respondent was checked by two officers of the respondent Institute at Mayur Vihar turning, one passenger, namely, Devender Sahu was found travelling in the bus without any valid ticket/pass. When the bus moved after checking, it was noticed by the officers of the respondent through the rear side glass that there was one more person travelling in the bus. Pursuant to this, the bus was followed and re-checked. A lady aged about 40 years was found concealing herself behind the rear seat of the bus. The following Articles of Charg...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »