Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deepak Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
$~11&12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : April 17, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6225/2012 DEEPAK Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Ruchir Misra and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for R-1. Mr.Manish Kumar Saran and Mr.S.P.Sharan, Advocates for R-2 and R-3. W.P.(C) 7025/2012 PARMOD VATS Represented by: .... Petitioner Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate. versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION ....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Manish Kumar Saran and Mr.S.P.Sharan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Identical issue raised in the two captioned petitions was decided by a Division Bench of which one of us, Pradeep Nandrajog, J.was a Member of, when four writ petitions, lead matter being W.P.(C) No.696/2013 Mukesh Kumar Vs. ESIC & Ors. ...
Karan Singh Pilania Vs. P.R.Gupte Etc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 15, 2013 Pronounced on: April 17, 2013 + CRL.REV.P. 581/2007 SHAKUNTALA PILANIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.B.S. Nain, Advocate versus P.R. GUPTA ETC. .....Respondent Through: + Nemo. CRL.REV.P. 582/2007 KARAN SINGH PILANIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.B.S. Nain, Advocate versus P.R. GUPTE ETC. Through: .....Respondents Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % 1. With the consent of both the sides, above captioned two petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Common order of 10th July, 2007 impugned in the above captioned two petitions, upholds conviction and sentence of simple imprisonment for a period of six months and compensation of `4,10,000/-; `6,60,000/Crl.Rev. P. No. 581/2007 & and `3,30,000/- awarded to complainant and in default thereof, petitioners have been ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for 45 days for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable ...
Indian Spinal Injuries Hospital Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order reserved on :10. 04.2013 Order pronounced on:16. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 9337/2009 SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF CULTURE HERITAGE ENVIRONMENT TRADITIONS AND PROMOTIONS OF NATIONAL AWARENESS ......Petitioner Versus UOI & ORS. + ......Respondents W.P.(C) 12719/2009 INDIAN SPINAL INJURIES HOSPITAL .....Petitioner Versus UOI & ORS. + ......Respondents W.P.(C) 13675/2009 BIJWASAN GRAM VIKAS SAMITI & ORS. .....Petitioners Versus UOI & ORS. Through : ......Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Ms. Renu and Mr. Anubha Surana, Advs. for petitioners in W.P.(C) 9337/2009 Ms Anjana Gosain and Mr T. Mitra, Advs. for AAI in W.P.(C) 9337/2009 and for AAI in W.P.(C) 12719/2009 Ms. Maneesha Dhir and Ms Mithu Jain Advs. for petitioners in W.P.(C) 12719/2009 Mr Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr Atul Sharma, Mr Milanka Chaudhury, Mr Abhishek Sharma, Mr. Amit Ojha and Mr. Manu Sahni, Advs for DIAL Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Adv. for NCT of Delhi in W.P.(C) 13675/2009 CORAM: HON'BLE ...
U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd Vs. Presiding Officer and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
$-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 810/2012 U.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr.Gaurav Kakar, Advocate versus PRESIDING OFFICER & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Dr. M.Y. Khan, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN ORDER % 16.04.2013 Alleging unlawful termination of his services, the respondent no.2/ workman raised an industrial dispute, which was referred to the Labour Court for adjudication. Vide an ex parte award dated 1.4.1997, the Labour Court directed reinstatement of the respondent no.2 with full back-wages and continuity of service. The appellant filed a writ petition challenging the award. The said petition having been dismissed vide order dated 3.10.2012, the appellant is before us by way of this appeal.2. A perusal of the record would show that on respondent no.2 filing the claim petition, the appellant filed a written statement on 24.2.1994. Thereafter, there was no appearance on behalf of the a...
Manmohan Anand Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
$-23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 221/2013 MANMOHAN ANAND ...... Appellant Through: Mr S. Hari Haran and Mr. Kapil Rustagi, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Mehra, ASG with Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN ORDER % 16.04.2013 CM 6063/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. LPA 221/2013 & CM 6062/2013 (stay) The appellant, an employee of Bank of Baroda was appointed as Presiding Officer of Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) on deputation basis, for a period of five years with effect from 15.9.2010 or till he attained the age of 62 years, whichever was to be earlier. Vide order dated 26.4.2012, a Division Bench of Madras High Court observed that the appellant had been taking contradictory stand, in violation of settled legal LPA 221/2013 various orders passed by him and, therefore, the matter required consideration by the con...
Smitha Krishnan Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 5990/2010 16th April, 2013 SMITHA KRISHNAN Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Anis Mohammad, Advocate. VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Romy Chako and Mr. Varun Mudgal, Advocates for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition filed by the petitioner Ms. Smitha Krishnan seeks the relief of her appointment with the respondent no.2-school after cancelling the appointment of the respondent no.4. The post in question is of an Assistant Teacher (OBC).2. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3-Society has drawn my attention to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Sindhi Education Society and Anr. Vs. Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. (2010) 8 SCC 4.in support of the proposition that since the respondent no.3 is a minority school, it has a complete right to appoint its teachers, sub...
Tajinder Kaur Vs. Guru Harkishan Public School and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.8040/2011, WP(C) No.7342/2011, WP(C) No.8041/2011, WP(C) No.8053/2011, WP(C) No.8054/2011, WP(C) No.8055/2011, WP(C) No.8189/2011 & Cont.Cas(C) No.868/2011 % 1. April 16, 2013 WP(C) No.8040/2011 TAJINDER KAUR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Naresh Thanai with Mr. J.P.Singh, Advs. versus GURU HARKISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Ms. Ferida Satarawala, Adv. for R-3. and 2. W.P.(C) No.7342/2011 MANJIT KAUR AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Naresh Thanai with Mr. J.P.Singh, Advs. versus GURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. for R- 1. Ms. Sonia Sharma for Mr. V.C.Jha, Adv. for R-2. and 3. W.P.(C) 8041/2011 BALJINDER KAUR WP(C) No.8040/2011 & Conn. Matters ..... Petitioner Page 1 of 10 Through: Mr. Naresh Thanai with Mr. J.P.Singh, Advs. versus GURU HARKISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOLD AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kau...
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Ashok Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
$-7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 8/2010 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ...... Appellant Through: Mr J.S. Bhasin and Ms Rashmi Priya, Advocate versus ASHOK KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN % ORDER 16 04.2013 The respondent-workman who was employed with the appellant did not attend the duty from 29.1.1993 to 16.3.1993 and then from 8.4.1993 to 2.5.1993. Alleging misconduct on the part of the respondent by remaining on leave without prior approval, in contravention of Paragraph 19(b)(m) of the Standing Orders issued by the appellant-DTC, an inquiry was conducted against the respondent. On the basis of the findings recorded in the inquiry, the services of the respondent were terminated vide order dated 25.2.1994. The appellant filed an application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, seeking approval of the Labour Court to remove the respondent from service. The Labour Court framed a prelimin...
Bijwasan Gram Vikas Samiti and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order reserved on :10. 04.2013 Order pronounced on:16. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 9337/2009 SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF CULTURE HERITAGE ENVIRONMENT TRADITIONS AND PROMOTIONS OF NATIONAL AWARENESS ......Petitioner Versus UOI & ORS. + ......Respondents W.P.(C) 12719/2009 INDIAN SPINAL INJURIES HOSPITAL .....Petitioner Versus UOI & ORS. + ......Respondents W.P.(C) 13675/2009 BIJWASAN GRAM VIKAS SAMITI & ORS. .....Petitioners Versus UOI & ORS. Through : ......Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Ms. Renu and Mr. Anubha Surana, Advs. for petitioners in W.P.(C) 9337/2009 Ms Anjana Gosain and Mr T. Mitra, Advs. for AAI in W.P.(C) 9337/2009 and for AAI in W.P.(C) 12719/2009 Ms. Maneesha Dhir and Ms Mithu Jain Advs. for petitioners in W.P.(C) 12719/2009 Mr Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr Atul Sharma, Mr Milanka Chaudhury, Mr Abhishek Sharma, Mr. Amit Ojha and Mr. Manu Sahni, Advs for DIAL Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Adv. for NCT of Delhi in W.P.(C) 13675/2009 CORAM: HON'BLE ...
Rajeev Dhawan Vs. Cpio Mard the Rti Cell Punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :11. 04.2013 Judgment pronounced on :16. 04.2013 LPA No.1043/2011 RAJEEV DHAWAN Through: ..... Appellant Appellant in person versus CPIO MARD THE RTI CELL PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK .... Respondent Through : Mr.Jagat Arora and Mr. Rajat Arora, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The appellant who is a practising advocate of this Court had, on the demise of his father, who was working with the respondent- Punjab National Bank, applied for compassionate appointment on 17.6.2004. However, during pendency of his application seeking compassionate appointment, there was a change in the policy of the bank which substituted the compassionate appointment scheme by ex gratia payment. As a result, the petitioner was not granted compassionate appointment. He filed W.P(C) No.6611/2011 seeking directions to the respondent bank to give appointment to him on compassionate ground, which has bee...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »