Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Guddu Rathore Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : February 14, 2013 DECIDED ON : April 17, 2013 + CRL.A.267/2000 GUDDU RATHORE ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sumeet Verma, Amicus Curiae. versus ..... Respondent STATE Through : Ms.Fizani Husain, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Appellant-Guddu Rathore challenges correctness of the judgment dated 16.11.1999 in Sessions Case No.87/1997 arising out of FIR No.78/1996 registered at Police Station Mandir Marg by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 376 IPC. He was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for ten years with fine of `500 by an order dated 24.11.1999.2. Daily Dairy (DD) No.17-A (Ex.PW-11/A) was recorded at 08.00 P.M. on 18.02.1996 at Police Station Mandir Marg to the effect that a girl aged 7/8 years has been raped and a boy has been apprehended. The investigation was assigned to SI Ranbir Singh who with Constable Jalbir Singh went to the spot. SI Samarjeet S...
Pankaj Kumar Vs. the Union Public Service Commission and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: April 17, 2013 + + W.P.(C) 5976/2011 W.P.(C) 5976/2011 PANKAJ KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Hooda with Mr. Prashant Kumar Advocate Versus THE UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANR. .... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Naresh Kaushik with Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocate for R-1 Ms. Rekha Palli with Ms. Punam Singh, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated July 15, 2011 in OA No. 2466/2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal). In the OA, the petitioner herein has sought a direction to the respondents to declare his result without adhering to the criteria of minimum qualifying marks for the interview and in that process if his name figures in the merit list in the written test as well as in the ...
M/S Garg Builders Vs. Rites Ltd. and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: April 17, 2013 + Arb.P.No.100/2012 M/S GARG BUILDERS Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sanjay Bansal, Adv. versus RITES LTD & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.Anil Seth, Adv. with Mr.M.K. Pathak & Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advs. for R-1 & R-3. Mr.Anil Grover, Adv. with Ms.Noopur Singhal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the abovementioned petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator in terms of arbitration clause 25 of the agreement. It is also mentioned in the prayer clause that the retired Engineer of CPWD be appointed who may be directed to adjudicate and decide the dispute between the parties.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner had entered into an agreement with the respondent on 23 rd August, 2007 for the work of construction of office building for Gurgaon Gramin Bank at Sector-44...
M.A.Ansari Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: April 10, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 17, 2013 + W.P.(C) 3056/2012 M.A.ANSARI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.T.D.Yadav, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC with Ms.Gurjinder Kaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On April 12, 2013, we had decided a batch of writ petitions, lead matter being WP(C) No.8102/2012 UOI & Anr. vs.K.L.Taneja & Anr. on the subject as to when can a person be granted promotion from a retrospective date. We had noted various decisions of the Supreme Court on the point as under:(i) 1987 (4) SCC 56.K.Madhavan & Anr. vs.UOI & Ors. (ii) 1989 Supp (2) SCC 62.Union of India & Ors. vs. K.K.Vadera & Ors. (iii) 1995 (4) SCC 24.Vinod Kumar Sangal vs.UOI& Ors. (iv) 1998 (7) SCC 4.Baij Nath Sharma vs. Honble Rajasthan High Court At Jodhpur & Anr. (v) AIR 200.SC 25.P.N P...
Susheel Kumar JaIn Vs. Dda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:17. 04.2013 W.P(C)No. 5646/2006 SUSHEEL KUMAR JAIN Through: ...... Petitioner Mr R.K. Saini, Advocate versus DDA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Arun Birbal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner Mr Susheel Kumar Jain got himself registered for allotment of a residential flat from DDA under its New Pattern Residential Scheme, known as NPRS, 1979. In a draw of lot held on 1.6.1987, a residential flat bearing number 114-B, in Pocket-F at Nand Nagri was allotted to him and a demand-cum-allotment letter bearing Block Date 7.7.1987 15.7.1987 was issued to him. The total cost of the flat sought to be charged from the petitioner was Rs.1,41,800/-. Since the allotment was made on hire-purchase basis, the petitioner was required to make payment of an initial sum of Rs.2,73,88.79 which was to get enhanced in case of delay in making payment and the last date for making the payment was 13.10.1...
Sh.Vinod Babu Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : April 17, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2493/2013 SH. VINOD BABU Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Meenu Mainee, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.R.V.Sinha and Mr.R.N.Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.4709/2013 Allowed. W.P.(C) No.2493/2013 1. Learned counsel as above appears for the respondents on advance copy being served.2. Arguments have been heard.3. Vide order dated June 05, 2008 penalty of removal from service was inflicted upon the petitioner. Appeal filed was disposed of vide order dated October 20, 2008 giving partial relief. Upholding penalty of removal from service it was directed that the petitioner would be entitled to full compensation allowance. Further statutory remedy of revision availed by the petitioner resulted in substantial relief ensuing to the petitioner when vide order...
M.M.Ajwani Vs. Dda and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:17. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 7792/2011 M.M.AJWANI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.K.Rungta, Senior Advocate With Mr.Prashant Singh, Adv. versus DDA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Arun Birbal, Advocate for R.1. Mr.V.C.Jha, Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocates For R.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner claims to have purchased residential flat bearing No.50, 2nd and 3rd floor, duplex in Pocket `F Sheikh Sarai, New Delhi which was allotted by DDA to Shri Davendra Prakash Goel. Shri Davendra Prakash entered into a transaction with one Shri Shakti Chand Rana for transfer of the aforesaid flat to him and executed the documents, such as, Agreement to Sell and registered General Power of Attorney in his favour. In turn, he entered into a transaction with the petitioner for sale of the aforesaid property to him and on the strength of the documents which had been executed by the allottee in his favo...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Naresh Kumar Kataria
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : April 17, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2454/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.Vibhav Misra, Advocate versus NARESH KUMAR KATARIA ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Record perused.3. Respondent was a part time vocational teacher (Stenography) appointed by the Directorate of Education and was posted at Updesh Kaur Sarvodaya Kanya vidyalaya, Daryapur Kalan. His services were terminated vide order dated December 17, 2009, which reads as under:To, Shri Naresh Kataria, Part-time Vocational teacher, (Stenography, English), S/o Sh.Pokar Das, H.No.-1072, V&P.O.-Bawana, Delhi039. Sir, I am directed to convey that the competent authority has terminated your part-time appointment on contingent basis in...
Commissioner of Income-tax-i Vs. Cheil Communications India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 04.2013 ITA 578/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-I ..... Appellant versus CHEIL COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT. LTD. Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant :Mr Rohit Madan, Advocate For the Respondent :Mr Salil Kapoor, Mr Vikas Jain, Mr Sanat Kapoor and Mr Ankit Gupta, Advocates CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal by the revenue is directed against the order dated 31.01.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appeal Tribunal in ITA No. 5161/Del/2011 relating to the assessment year 2006-07. This appeal was admitted for hearing on 31.12.2012 when the following substantial question of law was framed for the consideration of this court:- Did the Tribunal fall into error in holding that the reopening of assessment was bad in law, having regard to the ultimate order made by the AO in that the ground for reassessment was not on...
Shakuntala Pilania Vs. P.R.Gupta Etc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 15, 2013 Pronounced on: April 17, 2013 + CRL.REV.P. 581/2007 SHAKUNTALA PILANIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.B.S. Nain, Advocate versus P.R. GUPTA ETC. .....Respondent Through: + Nemo. CRL.REV.P. 582/2007 KARAN SINGH PILANIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.B.S. Nain, Advocate versus P.R. GUPTE ETC. Through: .....Respondents Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % 1. With the consent of both the sides, above captioned two petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Common order of 10th July, 2007 impugned in the above captioned two petitions, upholds conviction and sentence of simple imprisonment for a period of six months and compensation of `4,10,000/-; `6,60,000/Crl.Rev. P. No. 581/2007 & and `3,30,000/- awarded to complainant and in default thereof, petitioners have been ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for 45 days for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable ...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »