Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr.Shantanu Basu Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : April 18, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2503/2013 MR.SHANTANU BASU ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.A.K.Thakur, Advocate with Mr.R.K.Mishra, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.H.Hnunpull, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG , J.(Oral) CM No.4744/2012 Allowed; subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2503/2013 1. The petitioner has two issues. The first pertains to the Office Memorandum dated February 16, 1971 which requires that inquiries under CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 should be entrusted to officers who are sufficiently senior to the officers whose conduct is being inquired. The second is to be permitted a legal practitioner as the Defence Assistant at the inquiry.2. The petitioner is a member of the Indian Audit and Accounts Service. He is of the year 1984 batch. The Inquiry Officer is one Shri V.Ravindran, an officer of the Indi...
indus Towers Limited Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h September, 2012 Date of Decision:18th April, 2013 % + W.P. (C) 4976/2011 INDUS TOWERS LIMITED Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N Venkataraman, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Mr. Parivesh Singh and Ms. Anjali Chauhan, Advocates. versus UOI AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Siddhartha, Advocate on behalf of R-3. Ms Sonia Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel for Service Tax Department/ R-4. Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri, proxy for Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Advocate for UOI/R-1. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.This is a writ petition filed by M/s Indus Towers Ltd., (hereinafter referred to either as Indus or as the petitioner) seeking the issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the order of the Commissioner, Department of Trade and Taxes, Government of NCT of Delhi passed on 29.04.2011 on the ground that it is ultravires Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 and e...
Uoi and anr. Vs. Ps Purkayastha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: April 12, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 18, 2013 + WP (C) 1634/2012 UOI & ANR Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.R.N.Singh, Advocate with Mr.R.V.Singh, Advocate versus PS PURKAYASTHA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.S.Sunil, Advocate with Mr.Jagdish and Mr.S.P. Panda, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. This is probably the 30th case we have come across in which the source of the problem is an ex-parte order disposing of the main matter passed by the Tribunal on the very first date when the Original Application was listed before the Tribunal. We have repeatedly cautioned the Central Administrative Tribunal that howsoever water tight and irrefutable a case may appear at first blush, but under no circumstances can a judicial Fora decide a matter without putting the other side to notice. Such a procedure violates the principle of natural ju...
Ex. Const. Tejbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Other
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % W.P.(C) NO.2380/1999 EX. CONST. TEJBIR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.G. Kapoor, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Saquib, Advocate with Mr. Bhupinder Sharma, Dy. Commandant, BSF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.1. This petition, which has been filed by a former constable of Border Security Force (BSF), impugns the finding and sentence of a Summary Security Force Court (SSFC) held by the Commandant, 173rd Battalion, Border Security Force on 3rd March, 1998, whereby he was dismissed from service.2. The petitioner was recruited as a Constable in the BSF in the year 1990. It is alleged that on 14th December, 1996, during his posting at Taratala (Calcutta), when the petitioner, who was a part of a working party, was relaxing after working hours, an incident occurred. A Head Constable, M. A. Khan, found a mess boy in an ine...
Varinder Kaur Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:18. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 716/2012 BACHNI DEVI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. W.P.(C) 731/2012 VARINDER KAUR Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: ..... Respondent Ms Manisa Tripathy Pandey and Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 716/2012 Late Shri Ved Prakash, husband of the petitioner in W.P (C) No.716/2012 Smt. Bachni Devi got himself registered with DDA under its New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as NPRS-1979) for allotment of an LIG Flat by DDA and was assigned priority number 52765. The turn of late Shri Ved Prakash matured on 23.3.2006. In the draw of lot held on 27.9.2007, a flat came to be allotted to Shri Ved Prakash. However, no allotment letter was issued to him at that t...
Marico Limited Vs. Adani Wilmar Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h April, 2013 % + CS(OS) 246/2013 MARICO LIMITED Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anuradha Salhotra, Mr. Sumit Wadhwa & Mr. Zeeshan Khan, Advs. versus ADANI WILMAR LTD Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Neil Hilderth & Ms. Pratibha Shreedhar, Advs. AND + CS(OS) 319/2013 MARICO LIMITED Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anuradha Salhotra, Mr. Sumit Wadhwa & Mr. Zeeshan Khan, Advs. versus ADANI WILMAR LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Neil Hilderth & Ms. Pratibha Shreedhar, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J IA No.2129/2013 in CS(OS) No.246/2013 & IA No.2745/2013 in CS(OS) No.319/2013 (both of the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1&2 of the CPC).1. The plaintiff in these two suits for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from broadcasting, printing and publ...
Vodafone Infrastructure Ltd. and ors. Vs. ---
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. PET. No. 14 of 2012 Reserved on: April 1, 2013 Decision on: April 18, 2013 IN THE MATTER OF: VODAFONE INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate, Mr. Mihir Joshi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Niti Dixit, Mr. Sandeep Singhi, Mr.Vidur P. Bhatia, Ms. Raunaq B. Mathur & Ms. Samiksha Godiyal, Advocates for Petitioner No.1 Mr. Gopal Jain & Mr. Kunal Kaul, Advocates for Petitioner No.2. Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate, Mr. Mihir Joshi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Singhi, Mr. Rishi Agrawala & Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocates for Petitioner No.3. Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate, Mr. Mihir Joshi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Milanka Chaudhury, Mr. Sarojanand Jha, Mr. Siddharth Mehra & Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocates for Petitioner No.4. Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Additional Solicitor General of India with Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Senior Standing Counsel, Mr. Nitin Mehta and Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocates for Income Tax Department...
Aman Gupta Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary, Department of Per ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
Shekhar Agarwal, Member (A): The applicant is seeking the following relief:- (i) Allow this application. (ii) Consequently direct respondent no.1 to draw up the IAS reservation roster keeping in view its own OMs and the principles that vacancies are to be considered from the year 1996 and that a vacancy arising first shall be filled first irrespective of which CSE it was filled through. (iii) Consequently, direct respondent no.1 to allocate and appoint the applicant to the Indian Administrative Service on the basis of his 3rd rank in CSE 2010 in the visually impaired category and the then existence of 6 (backlog and fresh) vacancies. The respondent should also be directed that the applicant s appointment shall carry with it all consequential benefits such as those of seniority. (iv)Direct respondent no.2 to draw up the IFS reservation roster as per the laid down rules, starting from the recruitment year 1996 and putting Hearing, Locomotor and Visual disability categories at points 1, ...
Surjeet Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h April, 2013 + CRL.A. 376/2001 SURJEET SINGH Through: .... Appellant Mr. A.J.Bhambhani, Advocate with Ms. Nisha Bhambhani, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is directed against a judgment dated 14.11.2000 and order on sentence dated 15.11.2000 whereby the Appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of `5,000/- or in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC.2. At the time of hearing the Appeal a plea of juvenility was raised by the Appellant. By an order dated 05.02.2013 the Trial Court was required to conduct a fresh inquiry for determination of the age of the Appellant in view of the amen...
Sunita Nayyar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 2456/2013 17th April, 2013 SUNITA NAYYAR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Ashok Aggarwa and Ms. Nisha Tomar, Advocates. VERSUS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Pushpa Jhurang, Adv. for Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner/teacher seeking the following reliefs:(a) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to forthwith initiate enquiry into the matter of complaint dated 31.01.2013 of the Petitioner and to take appropriate action against the Respondent/School in accordance with law; (b) pass any such order on further orders in favour of the Petitioner as this Honble Court may deem just and appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice; and (c) allow the present Writ Petition with c...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »