Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajit Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: April 18, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2372/2010 W.P.(C) 2372/2010 AJIT KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate versus COMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani with Ms. Bandana Shukla, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated January 11, 2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in OA No.1498/2008 whereby the plea of the petitioner for a direction to the respondents herein, to appoint him as Constable (Executive) Male in Delhi Police was rejected.2. An FIR No.78/2002 was registered in which apart from two others, the petitioner was named as an accused for offences committed under Section 308/341/34 IPC, P.S. Vasant Vihar. The same culminated in an order of guilt. The petitioner was re...
Bachni Devi Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:18. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 716/2012 BACHNI DEVI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. W.P.(C) 731/2012 VARINDER KAUR Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: ..... Respondent Ms Manisa Tripathy Pandey and Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 716/2012 Late Shri Ved Prakash, husband of the petitioner in W.P (C) No.716/2012 Smt. Bachni Devi got himself registered with DDA under its New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as NPRS-1979) for allotment of an LIG Flat by DDA and was assigned priority number 52765. The turn of late Shri Ved Prakash matured on 23.3.2006. In the draw of lot held on 27.9.2007, a flat came to be allotted to Shri Ved Prakash. However, no allotment letter was issued to him at that t...
Union of India Vs. Ajay Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
$~7, 8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: April 18, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2807/2012 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.S.Mathur, Mr.G.Mathur, Advocates. versus AJAY SINGH ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Amandeep Joshi and Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advocates. AND W.P.(C) 2808/2012 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY: THE SECRETARY. ICAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.S.Mathur, Mr.G.Mathur, Advocates. versus RAMA KANT SHUKLA ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Amandeep Joshi and Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advocates. W.P.(C) 2810/2012 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.S.Mathur, Mr.G.Mathur, Advocates. versus MOHIT SHARMA ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Amandeep Jo...
Marico Limited Vs. Adani Wilmar Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h April, 2013 % + CS(OS) 246/2013 MARICO LIMITED Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anuradha Salhotra, Mr. Sumit Wadhwa & Mr. Zeeshan Khan, Advs. versus ADANI WILMAR LTD Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Neil Hilderth & Ms. Pratibha Shreedhar, Advs. AND + CS(OS) 319/2013 MARICO LIMITED Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anuradha Salhotra, Mr. Sumit Wadhwa & Mr. Zeeshan Khan, Advs. versus ADANI WILMAR LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Neil Hilderth & Ms. Pratibha Shreedhar, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J IA No.2129/2013 in CS(OS) No.246/2013 & IA No.2745/2013 in CS(OS) No.319/2013 (both of the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1&2 of the CPC).1. The plaintiff in these two suits for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from broadcasting, printing and publ...
Yashpal Singh Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: April 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 18, 2013 + WP (C) 4510/2012 JEET SINGH Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.J.S.Bhasin, Advocate with Ms. Rashmi Priya, Advocate. WP (C) 6764/2012 YASHPAL SINGH Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sumeet Batra, and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On the allegation of remaining on unauthorized leave, petitioner Jeet Singh was removed from service on July 06, 1992 and since an industrial dispute was pending between DTC and the Union of Employees working in DTC, an application was filed before the Industrial Tribunal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial ...
Yashpal Singh Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:18. 04.2013 W.P.(C) No.3961/2012 YASHPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Deepak Khosla, Advocate versus D.D.A. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sangram Patnaik with Mr. Umesh Yadav, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The agricultural land of the petitioner having been acquired for the planned development of Delhi, an alternative plot measuring 90 sq. mtr. was allotted to him, as per the policy of the respondent to allot alternative plot to persons whose land is acquired by them. Vide Demand-cum-Allotment letter dated 18th March, 2008, the petitioner was asked to pay the premium of the land at the pre-determined rate of Rs.6108.00 per sq. mtr. in the following manner:W.P.(C) No.3961/2012 page 1 o1. That 10% premium of the plot termed as earnest money/confirmation amount for Rs.54972.00 shall be deposited within 30 days from the date of issue of this demand letter.2. The 25% of the t...
Uoi and ors. Vs. Misri Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : April 18, 2013 + W.P.(C) 678/2012 UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate with Mr.R.N.Singh, Advocate versus MISRI LAL Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil K.Jha, Advocate with Mr.Ashish Kumar Mahor, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG , J.(Oral) 1. On the subject of entitled to be retrospectively promoted, reviewing various decision, being 10 in number pronounced by the Supreme Court, and in respect of which a Division Bench of this Court was noticing that different Benches of the Central Administrative Tribunal were reaching different conclusion, on April 12, 2013 a Division Bench of this Court of which Pradeep Nandrajog, J.was a Member of, had decided a batch of writ petitions, lead matter being WP(C) No.8102/2012 UOI & Anr. vs. K.L.Taneja & Ors. in which following decision were noted:(i) 1987 (4) SCC 56.K.Madha...
Union of India Vs. Mohit Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
$~7, 8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: April 18, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2807/2012 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.S.Mathur, Mr.G.Mathur, Advocates. versus AJAY SINGH ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Amandeep Joshi and Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advocates. AND W.P.(C) 2808/2012 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY: THE SECRETARY. ICAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.S.Mathur, Mr.G.Mathur, Advocates. versus RAMA KANT SHUKLA ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Amandeep Joshi and Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advocates. W.P.(C) 2810/2012 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.S.Mathur, Mr.G.Mathur, Advocates. versus MOHIT SHARMA ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Amandeep Jo...
M/S. Daulat Ram Industries Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 04.2013 Pronounced on:18. 04.2013 + FAO (OS) 280/2009 M/S. DAULAT RAM INDUSTRIES ..... Appellant Through: Sh. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tamali Wad, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Krishna Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The Appellant firms claim had been accepted, and award made in its favour, and against the respondent (hereafter employer), in arbitration proceedings. The employer preferred a petition objecting to the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, which was allowed by a learned Single Judge of this Court. Consequently, the present appeal.2. By the Purchase order dated 22.7.1999, the Appellant, M/s. Daulat Ram Industries agreed to supply 180 nos. of Rheostatic Dynamic Braking Resistors (DBR) with other accessories to the FAO (OS)280/2009 Page 1 Union of ...
Raj Kumar Saini Vs. Dda and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:18. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 8211/2011 RAJ KUMAR SAINI Through: Mr Manoj Singh, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus DDA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr P.K. Mittal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner before this Court got himself registered with the respondent- DDA for allotment of a plot of land under its Rohini Residential Scheme, 1981. At the time of registration, the petitioner was residing at X/3730, Shanti Mohalla, Raghubirpura-II, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi-110034. The petitioner shifted from that place to A-26, Rama Road, Adarsh Nagar, Delhi and intimated the change of address to DDA vide letters dated 30.01.1987 and 03.06.1987. To this extent, there is no dispute between the parties.2. The petitioner shifted to Canada and he claims to have intimated DDA vide letter dated 20.10.2003 that he was temporarily living in Canada at the address disclosed in the said letter. WP(C) No. 8211...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »