Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jeet Singh Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: April 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 18, 2013 + WP (C) 4510/2012 JEET SINGH Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.J.S.Bhasin, Advocate with Ms. Rashmi Priya, Advocate. WP (C) 6764/2012 YASHPAL SINGH Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sumeet Batra, and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On the allegation of remaining on unauthorized leave, petitioner Jeet Singh was removed from service on July 06, 1992 and since an industrial dispute was pending between DTC and the Union of Employees working in DTC, an application was filed before the Industrial Tribunal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial ...
M.A.Khan Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :6. h MARCH, 2013 DECIDED ON :18. h APRIL, 2013 + W.P.(Crl.) 2131/2005 & CRL.M.A.4000/2011 M.A.KHAN Through : ....Petitioner Mr.Bahar U. Barqi, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS. Through : .Respondents Mr.Saleem Ahmed, ASC with Ms.Charu Dalal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Petitioner- M.A.Khan has preferred the present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short Cr.P.C.) seeking directions to Central Bureau of Investigation (for short CBI) to conduct thorough inquiry and investigation for the atrocities committed upon his son by police officials of Police Station Bhajanpura and to quash the inquiry conducted by Mr.D.C.Srivastava, Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police (North-East), Delhi conveyed by letter dated 05.10.2005.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record. Counsel for the pet...
Balwant Singh Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:18. 04.2013 + RFA 715/2003 BALWANT SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Anand Yadav, Adv. versus UOI & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Lekha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) CM 16730/2011 (for condonation of delay of 2660 days in filing CM 16729/2011 for restoration) This is an application for condonation of delay in filing CM No.16729/2011, seeking restoration of this appeal which was dismissed in default and for nonprosecution on 29.4.2004. There is delay of as much as 2660 days (7 years and 105 days). The following are the reasons given in the application, for condonation of this abnormal delay of more than 7 years:2. That the appellant could not file the application for restoration of his aforementioned appeal in time due to the lack of knowledge and intimation of the dismissal order dated 29.4.2004.3. That the appellant came to know the above mentioned facts of dismissal of its afore...
Kingsway Camp Shop-keepers Welfare Assocation (Reg Vs. Delhi Developme ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:18. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 2318/2012 KINGSWAY CAMP SHOP-KEEPERS WELFARE ASSOCATION (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Sumit Bansal and Mr M.G. Vacher and Ms Sumi Anand, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ajay Verma, Adv. for DDA Mr Jatan Singh, CGSC and Mr Soayib Qureshi, Adv. for UOI, Mr Rajinder Handoo, Adv for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. In CWP No. 4150/2003, this Court had directed carving out allotment of shop plots to the petitioners in that case. One of the petitioners in that case was Vikas Khatri, who is respondent No. 3 in this petition. It is an admitted position before me that a plot measuring 900 square feet was to be allotted to Vikas Khatri in compliance of the order passed in the said writ petition. The allotment was to be made in Hudson Line, Kingsway Camp, Delhi.2. There is some vacant land between plot No. 114 and...
Shyam Singh Vs. Dda and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:18. 04.2013 W.P.(C) No.7960/2011 SHYAM SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Counsel for the petitioner versus DDA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Lekha Mrija, Advocate for DDA. Mr.Sanjay Pathak, Advocate for Respondent No.2/GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The land of the petitioner having been acquired for planned development of Delhi, he applied for allotment of an alternative plot to him as per the policy of the respondents, vide application dated 21 st August, 2006. The grievance of the petitioner is that no recommendation has so far been made by Govt. of NCT of Delhi to DDA for allotment of an alternative plot to him. W.P.(C) No.7960/2011 page 1 o2. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 Shri Sanjay Kumar Pathak states that the application of the petitioner for allotment of an alternative plot is yet to be considered by the Govt. though it is not disputed that his land was acqu...
Shiv Prasad Maurya Vs. Radhika and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18th April, 2013 % + MAC.APP. No. 151/2011 SHIV PRASAD MAURYA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate. Versus RADHIKA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Vinod K.Gandhi, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.Rajat Brar, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 03.11.2010 passed by the learned Tribunal, whereby the claim petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed.2. The learned Tribunal has arrived on the decision mentioned above by recording that the petitioner had proved the FIR as Ex.PW1/2, wherein number of the offending vehicle was mentioned as DL-3CJ-5153, whereas in his examination-in-chief filed by way of affidavit, he stated that the accident was caused by a vehicle bearing No. DL-3CT-5153. The appellant in his cross-examination by respondent Nos. 1 and ...
Union of India Represented By: the Secretary. Icar Vs. Rama Kant Shukl ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
$~7, 8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: April 18, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2807/2012 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.S.Mathur, Mr.G.Mathur, Advocates. versus AJAY SINGH ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Amandeep Joshi and Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advocates. AND W.P.(C) 2808/2012 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY: THE SECRETARY. ICAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.S.Mathur, Mr.G.Mathur, Advocates. versus RAMA KANT SHUKLA ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Amandeep Joshi and Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advocates. W.P.(C) 2810/2012 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.S.Mathur, Mr.G.Mathur, Advocates. versus MOHIT SHARMA ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Amandeep Jo...
Rds Project Ltd Vs. Ratangiri Gas and Power Pvt Ltd and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: April 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 18, 2013 + W.P.(C) 534/2011 RDS PROJECT LTD ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Advocate instructed by Ms.Asha Jain Madan and Mr.Mukesh Jain, Advocates. versus RATANGIRI GAS AND POWER PVT LTD AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG instructed by Ms.Bindu Saxena, Mr.Shailendra Swarup, Ms.Aparajita Swarup, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Ms.Shweta Gupta and Mr.Sidharth Tyagi and Mr.K.K.Patra, Advocates for R-1. Mr.Gaurab Banerji, ASG instructed by Mr.Sahil Tagotra, Mr.S.A.Haseeb and Mr.Ajit Pudusery, Advocates for GAIL. Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Ashok Mathur and Ms.Kanika Singh, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J 1.Dabhol Power Project at Ratnagiri (Mahrashtra) is of great national importance. Revival and restructuring of the project being in the interest ...
Sh. B.P. Vaish Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. 04.2013 + LPA 337/2005 SH. B.P. VAISH ..... Appellant Through: Nemo. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. When this appeal was called-up, there was no appearance on behalf of either of the parties. The appeal was listed as No. 1 in the Regular Hearing List. The Court has considered the records and proposes to dispose of the appeal on the basis of its consideration of the rival contentions of the parties as appear on the record.2. The appellant challenges the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 28.01.2004 whereby the first respondent (in the present case), i.e. the Govt. of NCT of Delhis Writ Petition CW No.7206/2000, challenging the reinstatement directed by the Delhi School Tribunal (hereafter referred to as the Tribunal) was allowed. The appellant had re...
Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. General Manager Punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 10238/2009 18th April, 2013 % SHRI VINOD KUMAR SHARMA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. K. G. Mishra, Advocate. VERSUS GENERAL MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner Sh. Vinod Kumar Sharma with a prayer that the impugned order dated 11.11.2005 and other related orders dated 2.1.2009 and 4.4.2009 be quashed and thereafter the petitioner for the period of suspension be paid full pay and allowances.2. It is not in dispute that the respondent-bank filed a criminal complaint against the petitioner for stealing of a transformer/stabilizer. It is also not in dispute that vide judgment dated 12.5.2005 of the Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi, the petitioner was acquitted on the ground that prosecution has failed to prove its case against th...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »