Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Chander Prakash Vs. Reserve Bank of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 1819/2004 22nd April, 2013 SH. CHANDER PRAKASH Through: ......Petitioner Mr. B.B. Sawhney, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. VERSUS RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. K.N. Bhat, Senior Advocate with Mr. H.S. Parihar, Advocate and Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner Sh. Chander Prakash impugning the orders passed by the Departmental Authorities viz the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority whereby the petitioner has been imposed the punishment as under:(i) In terms of Regulation 7 of Reserve Bank of India Pension Regulations, 1990, the pension of Shri Chander Prakash, Assistant Treasurer (Retired) be withdrawn by 50% of his basic pension for a period of three (3) years from the date of passing the final order i.e Mar...
Motian Devi Lamba Vs. Chet Ram Gupta and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. No.9328/2011 in CS(OS) No.2147/2010 Date of Decision:22. d April, 2013 + # MOTIAN DEVI LAMBA Plaintiff Through: Mr. P. Choudhary, Advocate versus $ CHET RAM GUPTA & OTHERS Defendants Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Adv. for D-1 Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nandni Sahni, Advocate for defendant Nos.2 to 4 Mr. Ameit Andley & Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advocates for applicant in I.A. No. 4029/2013 Mr. V.K. Tandon & Mr. Ajay Sethi, Advocates for Delhi Police along with SI Gyaneshwar Singh, PS-EOW Crime Branch AND % I.A. No. 9229/2011 in CS(OS) 2818/1989 SH. CHET RAM GUPTA CS(OS) No. 2147/2010 & 2818/1989 Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani with Mr. S.K. Chaturvedi, Advocates versus SMT.MOTIA DEVI LAMBA ..... Defendant Through: Mr. P. Chaudhary, Advocate for defendant No.1 Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nandni Sahni, Advocate for defendant Nos.2 to 4 * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: By this common order I shall disp...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi Vs. Upendra Agnidev
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: April 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1054/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate versus S.C.GUPTA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.S.K.Gupta, Advocate W.P.(C) 1228/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate versus UPENDRA AGNIDEV Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.S.K.Gupta, Advocate W.P.(C) 5792/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate versus J.M.SHARMA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.G.D.Bhandari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. On September 29, 2010, W.P.(C) No.18387/2004 and W.P.(C) No.18395/2004 were disposed of setting aside a common order dated April 06, 2004 disposing of OA No.452/2002 and OA No.453/2002 filed by S.C.Gupta and others as also Upender Agnidev and others, respectively. The matter was rem...
All India Ex-servicemen Bank Employee???s Federati Vs. the Chairman, S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.2533/2013 % April 22, 2013 ALL INDIA EX-SERVICEMEN BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.M. Tripathy, Advocate. versus THE CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate and Sh. Rajiv Kapur, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-All India Ex- Servicemen Bank Employees Federation (Regd.) seeking the reliefs that three candidates as stated in the writ petition be permitted to appear in the written examination scheduled to be held on 21.4.2013 and 27.4.2013 on clearing of which the person would be qualified for promotion to Officer WP(C) No.2533/2013 1 of 6 grade. There is also a related prayer for implementation of the notifications dated 2.4.1992 and 10.10.1994 issued by the Central ...
Chet Ram Gupta Vs. Motia Devi Lamba
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. No.9328/2011 in CS(OS) No.2147/2010 Date of Decision:22. d April, 2013 + # MOTIAN DEVI LAMBA Plaintiff Through: Mr. P. Choudhary, Advocate versus $ CHET RAM GUPTA & OTHERS Defendants Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Adv. for D-1 Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nandni Sahni, Advocate for defendant Nos.2 to 4 Mr. Ameit Andley & Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advocates for applicant in I.A. No. 4029/2013 Mr. V.K. Tandon & Mr. Ajay Sethi, Advocates for Delhi Police along with SI Gyaneshwar Singh, PS-EOW Crime Branch AND % I.A. No. 9229/2011 in CS(OS) 2818/1989 SH. CHET RAM GUPTA CS(OS) No. 2147/2010 & 2818/1989 Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani with Mr. S.K. Chaturvedi, Advocates versus SMT.MOTIA DEVI LAMBA ..... Defendant Through: Mr. P. Chaudhary, Advocate for defendant No.1 Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nandni Sahni, Advocate for defendant Nos.2 to 4 * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: By this common order I shall disp...
Lekh Ram Vs. Land and Building Department and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:22. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 2118/2013 LEKH RAM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr A.L. Verma and Mr Amit Rana, Advs. versus LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ORS Through: ..... Respondent Ms Manika Tripathy Pandey and Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advs for R-3/DDA Ms Jhum Jhum Sarkar, Adv. for R-1 and 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The agricultural land of the petitioner having been acquired for planned development of Delhi, he applied to Government of NCT of Delhi for allotment of alternative plot as per its scheme for Large Scale Acquisition of Land in Delhi notified on 2.5.1961. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he applied for allotment of an alternative plot way back in the year 1996, no recommendation has so far been made by Government of NCT of Delhi to DDA for such allotment.2. The learned counsel appearing for Government of NCT of Delhi states on instructions that the turn of ...
Dda Shopkeepers Association (Regd.) and anr. Vs. Delhi Development Aut ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:22.04.2013 W.P.(C) 6509/2010 DDA SHOPKEEPERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) & ANR. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv with Ms Aastha Dhawan, Advs versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr J.C. Mahendroo, Adv. For R-2 Mr Arjun Pant, Adv. for the DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court is an association of allottees of the commercial shops by DDA in Local Shopping Centre constructed on plots no. 2-420, New Rajender Nagar, New Delhi. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent, Delhi Development Authority has allotted vegetable platform to various persons, including respondent no.2, in the above referred shopping complex, and the allotment made and the conveyance deed executed in their favour and the terms and conditions of the allotment permits them to construct walls with a slopping roof, on the said platforms, without an...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi Vs. J.M.Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: April 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1054/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate versus S.C.GUPTA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.S.K.Gupta, Advocate W.P.(C) 1228/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate versus UPENDRA AGNIDEV Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.S.K.Gupta, Advocate W.P.(C) 5792/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate versus J.M.SHARMA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.G.D.Bhandari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. On September 29, 2010, W.P.(C) No.18387/2004 and W.P.(C) No.18395/2004 were disposed of setting aside a common order dated April 06, 2004 disposing of OA No.452/2002 and OA No.453/2002 filed by S.C.Gupta and others as also Upender Agnidev and others, respectively. The matter was rem...
Mukesh and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :22nd April, 2013 % + W.P.(CRL.) 516/2013 MUKESH & ANR. Through: .....Petitioners Mr.M.L.Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Addl. Standing Counsel for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The present Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC was filed on behalf of petitioners Mukesh and Akshay Kumar Singh through Mr.M.L.Sharma, Advocate praying for quashing of charge-sheet in case FIR No.413/2012 under Sections 365/376/(2)(g)/377/394/34 PS Vasant Vihar. Prayer has also been made for quashing of the order on charge dated 02.02.2013 and further orders dated 28.03.2013 and 01.04.2013 passed in the abovenoted case by learned Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court).2. On 05.04.2013 when the Writ Petition came up for hearing before this Court, Mr.A.P.Singh, Advocate appeared and filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of petiti...
Hari Om Mehta Vs. Nirmal Das and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.180/2005 Decided on :22. d April, 2013 HARI OM MEHTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Nishant Datta, Ms. Sampath Sudha and Ms. Garima Hooda, Advocates. versus NIRMAL DAS & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. G.S. Sharma, Advocate. Ms. Priya Kumar & Mr. Adhish Srivastava, Advocates for Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) Rev. Pet. No.119/2011 1. This is an application for review of the order dated 24 th November, 2010.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant/applicant and gone through the record.3. The main contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the present appeal was dismissed as having become infrucutous and as withdrawn on account of the statement purported to have been made by Mr.Rohit Gandhi, counsel for the appellant on 24.11.2010 to the effect that since Gurbux Singh, legal heir of Nirmal Das has further obtained probate accordingly, the appellant b...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »