Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajiv Kumar Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h February, 2013 DECIDED ON :22. d April, 2013 CRL.A. 374/2004 RAJIV KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Aditya Singh, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the Crl.A.No.292/2004 titled Vinod Tyagi Vs.The State. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE April 22, 2013 sa file of...
Sh. Chet Ram Gupta Vs. Smt. Motia Devi Lamba
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. No.1538/2013 in CS(OS) 2818/1989 Date of Decision:22. d April, 2013 + # SH. CHET RAM GUPTA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Advocate with Mr. S.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate. VERSUS $ * SMT.MOTIA DEVI LAMBA Through: ..... Defendant Mr. P. Choudhary, Advocate for D-1. Ms. Paramjeet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Shukla, Advocate for defendant (Attorney) Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nandni Sahni, Advocate for Defendant Nos. 2,3 & 4. Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate for applicant in IA not l 9229/2011. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: In this suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell in respect of one plot in Greater Kailash-II, New Delhi filed by the deceased plaintiff Chet Ram, against the owner of the said plot Smt. Motian Devi and some other persons who were claiming that the suit plot had been in fact gifted to them by Smt. Motian Devi, the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff have filed the ...
Vinod Kumar Vs. Parimal Rai, Chairman Ndmc and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : April 18, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : April 22, 2013 + CONT.CAS(C) 345/2010 VINOD KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.P.D.P. Deo, Advocate. versus PARIMAL RAI, CHAIRMAN NDMC & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms.Madhu Tewatia and Ms.Sidhi Arora, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this petition and as stated are as under.2. On 3rd February, 2003, petitioner applied to the MTNL for allotment of a PCO at the back side of House not D-11/155 West Kidwai Nagar, New Delhi. The MTNL issued a demand letter of the same date and called upon the petitioner to deposit the security amount for the PCO which was installed.3. Another application was made in the year 2004 to the MTNL for another PCO at the same site with the installatio...
Harjinder Kumar and Nar Vs. Dda and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:22. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 1307/2011 HARJINDER KUMAR AND NAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Sanjiv Kakra and Mr Irfan Ahmed, Advs. versus DDA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Dr. Indra Pratap Singh, Adv for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner No.1 before this Court claims to be owner of the basement and ground floor of Property No. RR-11, Mianwali Nagar, Rohtak Road, New Delhi, whereas petitioner No. 2 claims to be owner of a part of its third floor. The respondent-DDA issued notice dated 15.03.2010 to petitioner No. 1 Harjinder Kumar, alleging the following unauthorized constructions in the above-referred building:1. Construction of property is not as per sanction plan and violative of Master Plan.2. Construction is more than sanction.3. Basement entry is from front set back.4.5. Coverage at all permissible/sanction.6. Overall FAR permissible.7. Parking space at left side set back...
The Management of Dtc Vs. Om Prakash (Deceased) Represented By: Legal ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : April 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 7671/2011 THE MANAGEMENT OF DTC Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Arati Advocate Mahajan Shedha, versus OM PRAKASH (DECEASED) REPRESENTED BY: LEGAL HEIRS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.S.N Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1 The challenge in the writ petition is to the order dated 17.03.2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) in O.A. 2490/2010 whereby the Tribunal allowed the claim of the respondents herein inter-alia for the payment of interest on arrears of pension w.e.f. 01.08.1993 to 30.06.2009, the actual date of payment of pension arrears and further to the refund of amount of `37,145.72 after adjusting the interest on the principal payment of employer share of Contributed Provident Fund. 2 Brief facts are that the respondent herein was sent on training as conductor by the ...
Tanveer and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :22. d April, 2013 + CRL.A. 78/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.781/2011 TANVEER & ANR. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Jaivir Bains, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. Insp.Binay Singh, PS Hazrat Nizamuddin. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.70/2011 titled Tofiq Vs. State . (S.P.GARG) JUDGE April 22, 2013 sa...
Mrs. Kirti Sharma Vs. Punjab National Bank and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.3584/2012 % April 22, 2013 MRS. KIRTI SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jagat Arora, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by Mrs. Kirti Sharma seeking directions against the respondent No.1/bank/employer for granting to her the due pensionary benefits w.e.f 1.10.2010.2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was an employee of the respondent No.1 and was working as Special Assistant with the respondent No.1. Her ordinary date of superannuation was 30.9.2010. The respondent No.1/bank introduced the second pension option for an existing WP(C) No.3584 /2012 1 of 5 pension scheme and the last date for exercising the option was 25.10.2010. Petitioner admittedly exercised this option within time on 26.8.2010.3. Since the petitio...
Vimlesh @ Kamlesh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 116/2013 VIMLESH @ KAMLESH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Prem Prakash, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector Lekh Raj, Police Station Karwal Nagar, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR ORDER 22 04.2013 % 1. By this application under Section 439 of Cr. P.C., applicant seeks regular bail in FIR case being FIR No.183/2012, registered under Section 498-A/304-B/34 of IPC, at Police Station Karawal Nagar, New Delhi.2. Arguing counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and she is not a previous convict. Learned counsel also submits that applicant is the mother in law of the deceased and she is an innocent law abiding citizen of this country. Learned counsel also submits that all the prosecution witnesses examined by the State had turned hostile except the complainant but even in his ...
Union of India and anr. Vs. Raj Kumar Jha and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: April 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2683/2012 RAJ KUMAR JHA Represented by: .....Petitioner Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjeev Chaswal, Ms.Saahila Lamba,Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajinder Nishal, Advocate with Mr.Ashish Nischal, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate with Ms.Aditi Gupta and Ms.Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Advocates for UPSC AND W.P.(C) 7710/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha and Mr.R.N.Singh, Advocates versus RAJ KUMAR JHA & ORS. Represented by: W.P.(C) Nos.2683/2012 & 7710/2012 ..... Respondents Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjeev Chaswal, Ms.Saahila Lamba, Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate with Ms.Aditi Gupta and Ms.Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Advocates for UPSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JU...
National Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. Rajnigandha Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: April 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 22, 2013 + CRL.M.C. No.1792/2008 NATIONAL FERTILIZERS LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ram Prakash Gupta, Advocate Versus RAJNIGANDHA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Seema Gulati, Advocate for respondents No. 2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT Challenge to the impugned order of 16th February, 2008 is on the ground of inadequacy of sentence imposed upon respondents-accused. In the impugned order, the sentence of fine imposed upon respondent No.1 is of `2.50 crores and upon realisation of fine, `2.30 crores is awarded to petitioner- complainant and respondent No.2 has been sentenced to six months imprisonment with fine of `4.50 crores and in default of payment of fine, he has to undergo simple imprisonment of three months and third respondent has been sentenced to fine of `5,000/- only.2. At the hearing, it was urged by petitione...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »