Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr.Bhanu Dutt Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :17. .04.2013 Judgment pronounced on :22. 04.2013 W.P.(C) No.9499/2007 MR.BHANU DUTT Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.R.K.Saini, Adv. versus D.D.A. .... Respondent Through : Mr.Devvrat Singh Raghav, Adv ocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The petitioner got himself registered with the respondent/DDA for allotment of an MIG flat under its New Pattern Registration Scheme (NPRS) 1979. In a draw of lots held on 1st June, 1987, one flat bearing No.155-A(Ground Floor) in PocketF, Nand Nagri, Delhi was allotted to the petitioner and a Demand-cum-Allotment Letter bearing Block dates 7.7.1987 15.7.1987 was issued to him, requiring him to deposit the amount of Rs.150181.55 on or before 13.9.1987. The aforesaid amount could be deposited, with interest, on or before 13.10.1987. It was clearly stipulated in the Demand-cum-Allotment Letter that there would be an automatic cancellation of the allotment after 13.10....
Krishana Devi Vs. D.D.a
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:22. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 10522/2009 KRISHANA DEVI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr S.K. Rungta, Sr. Adv with Ms Pratiti Rungta and Mr Prashant Singh, Advs versus D.D.A ..... Respondent Through: Mr Rakesh Mittal, Adv for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner got herself registered with respondent-DDA for allotment of a residential flat under its Ambedkar Awas Yojna Scheme (AAYS). Vide letter bearing No. M312(2018)2001/AAY/DW dated 26-31/12/2001, the petitioner was allotted flat No. A-19 in Pkt-A, Sector-17, Dwarka. He was required to deposit a sum of Rs 400,493.35 on or before 30.01.2002. The aforesaid amount, along with the amount of interest, stipulated in the said letter could also be deposited on or before 31.03.2012. The allotment letter stipulated automatic cancellation of the allotment in case the payment was not made by 31.03.2002. Admittedly, the petitioner made payment only of...
Mahesh Chander Kalra Vs. Bank of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.1888/1996 % April 22, 2013 MAHESH CHANDER KALRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Manjit Chawla, Advocate. versus BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Jahanvi Vorah, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition filed by Sh. Mahesh Chander Kalra impugns the departmental proceedings and the orders passed by the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority whereby the petitioner has been visited with the punishment of dismissal from services.2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was issued Article of Charges dated 2.7.1993 alongwith relevant Statement of Allegations, List of Documents and List of witnesses by the respondent No.1-bank. Sum and substance of the charges against the petitioner were effectively of taking fraudulent credits totalling to `22,571.83/- on the basis of a false credit note. The amount o...
Harjinder Kaur Vs. the School Management of Guru Harkishan Public Sch
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 170/2013& CM No. 361/2013 22nd April, 2013 HARJINDER KAUR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Raj Kumar Sherawat, Advocate. VERSUS THE SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF GURU HARKISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL HEMKUNT COLONY & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. Amiet Andley, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. In this writ petition three reliefs are claimed. The first is the claim for quashing of the suspension order dated 18.10.2011 and the second is the claim for setting aside of the suspension order as the period of six months under Rule 115(2) of the Delhi School Education Act & Rules, 1973, has expired and no fresh order has been passed. The third is the claim of salary for the months of August to November, 2009 alongwith interest @ 12% per annum.2. So far as the first prayer for quashing of the suspension order dated 18....
Raj Kumar Jha Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: April 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2683/2012 RAJ KUMAR JHA Represented by: .....Petitioner Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjeev Chaswal, Ms.Saahila Lamba,Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajinder Nishal, Advocate with Mr.Ashish Nischal, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate with Ms.Aditi Gupta and Ms.Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Advocates for UPSC AND W.P.(C) 7710/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha and Mr.R.N.Singh, Advocates versus RAJ KUMAR JHA & ORS. Represented by: W.P.(C) Nos.2683/2012 & 7710/2012 ..... Respondents Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjeev Chaswal, Ms.Saahila Lamba, Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate with Ms.Aditi Gupta and Ms.Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Advocates for UPSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JU...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Jagdish Prasad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: April 09, 2013 Judgment pronounced on: April 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4847/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.R.L.Dhawan, Advocate. versus JAGDISH PRASAD Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Meenu Mainee, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG , J.1. Joining service under the Indian Railways as a Goods Clerk on June 30, 1980, the respondent was promoted to the post of Goods Supervisor on July 02, 2004, a post in the pay scale `5500-9000 by the Divisional Railway Manager, but it appears that the formal communication was sent under the signature of Senior Divisional Commercial Manager. It is trite that it is the order passed on the file which determines the authorship thereof and not the ministerial function of sending a communication pertaining to the same.2. On July 28, 2008 a Memorandum of Charges was served on the respondent allegin...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi Vs. S.C.Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: April 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1054/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate versus S.C.GUPTA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.S.K.Gupta, Advocate W.P.(C) 1228/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate versus UPENDRA AGNIDEV Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.S.K.Gupta, Advocate W.P.(C) 5792/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate versus J.M.SHARMA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.G.D.Bhandari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. On September 29, 2010, W.P.(C) No.18387/2004 and W.P.(C) No.18395/2004 were disposed of setting aside a common order dated April 06, 2004 disposing of OA No.452/2002 and OA No.453/2002 filed by S.C.Gupta and others as also Upender Agnidev and others, respectively. The matter was rem...
Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore Vs. National Rifle Association of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CS(OS) No. 506/2013 Date of Decision:22. d April, 2013 + # RAJYAVARDHAN SINGH RATHORE Plaintiff Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P.S. Bindra, Mr. Ketan Madan, Mr. Ajay Bansal & Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Advocates versus $ * NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Defendant Through: Mr. Prag P.Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jaiveer Shergill and Mr. Ankur Sood, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN JUDGMENT P.K.BHASIN, J: Col. Rajyavardhan Singh, AVSM, who had represented India in the 2004 Olympics held in Athens as a Rifle Shooter and had become the first Indian in the post independence era to have won a silver medal for the country, is now fighting a legal battle since his dream to win a berth in the Governing Body of National Rifle Association of India(NRAI for short), the defendant herein, which selects the teams for international shooting events, has been shattered because he has been defeated by the incumbent President of the Gov...
Ruchika Arora and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 2544/2013 & CM Nos.4818-19/2013 22nd April, 2013 % RUCHIKA ARORA & ORS. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. Rajender Yadav, Adv. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Ms. Abha Malhotra, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Mini Pushkarna, standing counsel for MCD/R-4. Mr. R.K.Singh, Advocate for R-5 (NCERT) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by 34 persons. Irrespective of prayer clauses in the writ petition, what the petitioners effectively claim is that they should be held entitled to appear in the examination and thereafter get appointed as Special Education Teachers with the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi.2. Applicants, as per the advertisement number 1/13 (which is filed as Annexure P-2 to the writ petition) for appointment as a Special Education Teacher in Directorate of Education, besides having the quali...
United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Prem Sagar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.A. 311/2012 % Judgment reserved on:19. h March, 2013 Judgment delivered on:22. d April, 2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar and Mr. Ram Anugrah Pandey, Advs. versus PREM SAGAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Wadhwa, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 20.12.2011, whereby the appellant was held liable to pay the compensation amount in favour of the respondent no. 1 / claimant.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued on two grounds that ld. Tribunal failed to determine whether such permanent disability has affected or will affect the earning capacity of the respondent no.1, specifically where respondent no. 1 failed to prove his employment / job on or before the date of accident.3. Another ground is that ld. Tribunal has not considered the age of the injured while ...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »