Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr.Rajesh Kumar Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: April 08, 2013 Judgment pronounced on: April 23, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1442/2007 DR.RAJESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents MrAmitesh Kumar, Proxy Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG , J.1. Impugned order dated July 21, 2006 disposing of O.A.No.1506/2005 has held the claim to be barred by limitation and constructive res judicata.2. At an earlier round of litigation when O.A.No.2203/2001 filed by the petitioner was disposed of by the Tribunal on July 01, 2003, direction issued was to implement Dr.Seshagiri Committees recommendations pertaining to the pay scales with effect from January 01, 1986 and not September 11, 1989.3. Dr.Seshagiri Committees recommendations pertained to revision of pay scales of various posts in the EDP cadre i.e. Electronic Data Processing Cadre. The imp...
Sharma Montessori Sch.and Oriental College Vs. Socy Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:23. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 3219/2000 SHARMA MONTESSORI SCH.& ORIENTAL COLLEGE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. B. Krishan, Adv. versus SOCY VS. UOI & ORS Through: ..... Respondent Mr Sachin Datta, Adv. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court is a society stated to be running a number of schools in Delhi. The case of the petitioner is that it started running a middle school under the name of Sharma Montessori School on a plot of land belonging to the government in Minto Roa area of New Delhi. This is also the case of the petitioner that on 22.7.1954, a temporary allotment of the aforesaid piece of land was made to the petitioner by the Land & Development Office, on a temporary basis. Since the aforesaid land was sought to be allotted to Mata Sundari College, vide letter dated 5.9.1975 issued by the Land & Development Office, the respondents allotted an alternative piece ...
Neelu Lunga Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :23. d April, 2013 + CRL.A.1163/2011 NEELU LUNGA .Appellant Through: Ajay Verma with Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advocates. Versus STATE .....Respondent. Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.715/2011 titled Ramesh @ Ramu @ Dudh Nath vs.State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (S.P.GARG) JUDGE April 23, 2013 sa...
Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. Brij Mohan and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. 04.2013 + LPA 646/2005 ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE ..... Appellant versus SUBASH CHAND AND ANR. + ..... Respondents LPA 647/2005 ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE ..... Appellant versus BRIJ MOHAN AND ANR. ..... Respondents Appellants Through : Sh. Jagat Arora and Sh. Rajat Arora, Advocates. ..Respondents Through : Sh. M.K. Vashisht, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. In these two appeals, a common judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 25.02.2005, allowing W.P.(C) 7087/2003 LPA 646/2005 & LPA 647/2005 Page 1 and W.P.(C) 7096/2003 have been impugned. By the said judgment, learned Single Judge held that the Prathama Pariksha Examination qualification held by the two writ petitioners (respondents in the present appeals) were equivalent to matriculation qualification and consequently they were eligible for promotion from the post o...
Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. Subash Chand and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. 04.2013 + LPA 646/2005 ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE ..... Appellant versus SUBASH CHAND AND ANR. + ..... Respondents LPA 647/2005 ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE ..... Appellant versus BRIJ MOHAN AND ANR. ..... Respondents Appellants Through : Sh. Jagat Arora and Sh. Rajat Arora, Advocates. ..Respondents Through : Sh. M.K. Vashisht, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. In these two appeals, a common judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 25.02.2005, allowing W.P.(C) 7087/2003 LPA 646/2005 & LPA 647/2005 Page 1 and W.P.(C) 7096/2003 have been impugned. By the said judgment, learned Single Judge held that the Prathama Pariksha Examination qualification held by the two writ petitioners (respondents in the present appeals) were equivalent to matriculation qualification and consequently they were eligible for promotion from the post o...
Manohar Lal Madan Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:23. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 2622/2013 MANOHAR LAL MADAN Through: Mr Sumit Bansal, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr Amit Mehra, Adv. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner before this Court got himself registered under New Pattern Registration Scheme (NPRS), 1979 of the respondent-DDA for allotment of a residential flat to him. On the request of the petitioner, the aforesaid registration was transferred in the name of his father on 12.05.1987, before his turn for allotment of a residential flat could mature. In the meantime, DDA came out with a scheme for allotment of residential plots in Delhi known as Rohini Residential Scheme, 1981. The petitioner got himself registered under Rohini Residential Scheme also and he was assigned Priority Number 10688. In the draw of lots held on 29.03.1988, the father of the petitioner was allotte...
Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax- ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 7944/2011 RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU) AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 7945/2011 RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU) AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 7946/2011 RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU) AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 7947/2011 RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU) AND ANR W.P.(C) Nos. 7944/11, 7945/11, 7946/11 & 7947/11 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr Satyen Sethi, Mr Mayank Nagi and Mr Arta Trana Panda, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr Kiran Babu, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHM...
Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax- ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 7944/2011 RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU) AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 7945/2011 RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU) AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 7946/2011 RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU) AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 7947/2011 RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(LTU) AND ANR W.P.(C) Nos. 7944/11, 7945/11, 7946/11 & 7947/11 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr Satyen Sethi, Mr Mayank Nagi and Mr Arta Trana Panda, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr Kiran Babu, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHM...
Arjun Dev and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2013
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : April 23, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7465/2012 ARJUN DEV & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.T.D.Yadav, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate with Mr.Gaurav Verma and Mr.Varun Dubey, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG , J.(Oral) 1. We just do not understand why the petitioners are litigating.2. As per Government of India, Ministry of Defence letter dated May 11, 1998, skilled grade of pay was implemented with effect from October 16, 1981.3. Allowing OA No.2585/2009, vide order dated April 29, 2010, the Tribunal directed that the nine applicants before it who were appointed as cane-weaver between the years 1979 and 1994 would be paid salary applicable in the pay scale of skilled grade. In para 9 of its decision, the Tribunal directed that its decision would be applicable from the date of initial appo...
Delhi Chit Fund Association Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 04.2013 W.P. (C) 4512/2012 DELHI CHIT FUND ASSOCIATION versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .......Petitioner .......Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Venkatraman, Sr. Adv. with Mr Ravi Sikri, Mr Hari Shankar, Mr Ayush Kumar, Advocates. : Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Mukesh Anand, Mr Aditya Malhotra, Advcoates for R-1. Mr Kamal Nijhawan, Sr. Standing Counsel for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V.EASWAR, J 1.The short question which arises in this writ petition is whether the provision of services in relation to conducting a chit business is a taxable service for the purposes of section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994 inserted w. e. f. 1st July, 2012.2. Delhi. The petitioner is an association of chit fund companies based in By a notification No.26/2012 issued on 20 th June, 2012, the Department of Revenue, Ministry...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »