Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Punjab National Bank and ors. Vs. H.N.Wadhwa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on : Judgment pronounced on :28. 02.2013 04.03.2013 LPA 191/2007 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. .Appellants Through : Mr. V.K.Rao, Sr. Adv. along with Mr.Ayushya Kumar and Ms. Neha Bhatnagar, Adv. H.N.WADHWA ..........Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok Bhalla, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The respondent, who at the relevant time was working as a Manager with the appellant Bank was posted at Bhadoi in U.P. from 21st August, 1985 to 27th November, 1986. On the allegations that he had submitted as many as 15 fake hotel bills for Rs.21257.20, the following charge-sheet was served upon the respondent:Shri H.N. Wadhwa, Manager (under suspension), Branch Office, Rana Pratap Bagh, Delhi, during his tenure as Manager on deputation at B/O, Badoi, fraudulently claimed payment of TA/DA bills from the bank, during the period 27.02.86 to 27.11.86 by submitting 15 fake hotel bills for Rs 2...
Godrej Consumer Products Limited Vs. Dabur India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:04. 03.2013 + FAO(OS) 455/2012 and CM No.16502/2012 (Stay) GODREJ CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rajiv Tyagi, Ms.Chanchal Biswal, Mr.Ajay Kumar and Mr.Gyanendra Sharma, Advocates. versus DABUR INDIA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sudhir K.Makkar with Ms.Meenakshi Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant as defendant in the suit failed to file the written statement within the time stipulated or extended whereafter the written statement was sought to be brought on record by filing an application under Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC after delay of 209 days beyond a period of 90 days. The learned single Judge, despite the extraordinary delay, showed indulgence by permitting the written statement to be taken on record, but subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,00,000/- to the respondent and it is only on the im...
SallamuddIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 954/2012 and Crl. M.B. No. 2118/2012 Reserved on:21. t February, 2013 Decided on:4. h March, 2013 % SALLAMUDDIN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kanchan Kumari and Mr. R.N. Jha, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By the present appeal, the Appellant impugns the judgment dated 24th July, 2012 convicting the Appellant for offence under Section 354 IPC and order on sentence dated 26th July, 2012 directing him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-. The receipt of payment of fine amount has been placed on record.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant contends that there are material improvements in the statement of PW3 the complainant. Her husband and uncle, who were material witnesses and could have corroborated the version of the Complainant, have not been examined. The FIR was registered belatedly. No statement of...
O.N.Kaul Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : February 14, 2013 Pronounced on : March 04, 2013 + CRL.REV.P. 83/2004 O.N. KAUL .... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr.Amir Singh Pasrich, Mr.Avi Singh and Ms.Mohana Malhotra, Advocates Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State with Sub-Inspector Bhoop Singh, Police Station IGI Airport, Delhi. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT 1 Aggrieved by impugned order directing framing of charges under Section 304-A of IPC and the charge framed against petitioner on 26th September, 2003 in FIR No. 379/1998 registered at Police Station IGI Airport, New Delhi, this revision petition is preferred by petitioner accused on the ground that none of ingredients of Section 304-A of IPC are satisfied warranting framing of charge of criminal negligence against petitioner accused.2. Factual background of this case as noted in the impugned order of...
Ms Mamta Vs. University of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
$~ 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 350/2013 & CM.727/2013 % Judgment dated 04.03.2013 MS MAMTA Through: ..... Petitioner Ms.Monica Kapoor, Advocate versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Mohinder J.Rupal, Advocate for R=1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a rather peculiar case where the petitioner approached the respondent for admission in B.Ed. programme 2012-13 under the OBC category, after succeeding in the written examination as well as in the interview in June, 2012. The course commenced from 23.7.2012 and the petitioner started attending classes as well as the school experience programme. In August, 2012, the petitioner was informed orally that her OBC category, under which she had appeared, was not covered under the reserved category of the Central List. Petitioner was also orally informed that she could give a request in writing for consideration of her candidature under the General category....
Babloo Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :4. h March, 2013 + CRL.A. 224/2006 & CRL.M.A.2854/2013 BABLOO ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Anish Dhingra, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Babloo impugns judgment dated 02.07.2005 and order on sentence dated 04.07.2005 of Special Judge (NDPS Act) in Sessions Case No.64/2003 arising out of FIR No.326/2003 under Sections 20 & 21/61/85 of the NDPS Act, PS Shakarpur by which he was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 20/21/61/85 NDPS Act. He was sentenced to undergo RI for five years with fine ` 50,000/- under Section 21 (b) NDPS Act and in default of payment of fine to further undergo SI for five months. CRL.A. 224/2006 He was also sentenced to undergo RI for page 1 of 5 fourteen years with fine ` 1,40,000/- under Section 20 (c) NDPS Act and in default of payment of fine to further undergo S...
P.S.Rawal and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % RESERVED ON:07. 02.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:04. 03.2013 + W.P. (C) 6081/2012 CM APPL.16414/2012 P.S.RAWAL AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashok Mahajan and Ms. Kamlesh Mahajan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna with Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT 1 The petitioners (four in number) are working as Inspector Generals, Railway Protection Force (hereinafter referred to as RPF or the Force). The next higher post from the post of Inspector General is the post of Additional Director General, RPF. They seek directions to the respondents to consider them for promotion to the post of Additional Director General, (ADG) RPF, and further directions to restrain the respondents from filling up the post of ADG, by transfer/deputation. W.P. (C) 6081/2012 P...
Sh. R.K. Kohli Vs. the Government of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No. 1230/2010 4th March, 2013 % SH. R.K. KOHLI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Jayant Nath, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bhim Sen, Advocate. versus THE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. L.K. Garg, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Anupam Verma, Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate for TPDDC, Advocate. Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate for Pension Trust. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. In a batch of petitions with lead case being W.P.(C) No.13834/2009 titled as Iqbal Chand Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. decided on 31.1.2013, I have decided an issue which is also an issue in the present case viz. which is the entity liable to pay the service dues of erstwhile employees of DVB? 2. I have in the judgment dated 31.1.2013 following the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of North Delhi Power Limited Vs. Govt. of National Capita...
National Highways Vs. Progressive Mvt (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:4th March, 2013 % + FAO(OS) 291/2012 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Arun Kumar Verma, Ms. Mansi Wadhera & Mr. Ashish Bansal, Advocates. versus PROGRESSIVE - MVT (JV) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Vinay Gupta & Mr.R. Ravi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant awarded a contract for works of four laning and strengthening of a existing two-lane carriageway from Gopalganj- Muzaffarpur Section of NH-28 in the State of Bihar to the respondent vide a letter dated 9.9.2005 which resulted in the formal contract agreement dated 20.10.2005.2. In the process of execution of the contract some disputes arose between the parties which were initially referred to the Dispute Resolution Board (hereinafter referred to as DRB). Even the decision of the DRB was not acceptable to the appellant and thereafter the arb...
New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Po Labour Court No Ix a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:25. 02.2013 Judgment pronounced on :04. 03.2013 LPA 96/2012 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M.Bagai, Mr. Shadman Ali and Ms. Damini Khaire, Advs. versus PO LABOUR COURT NO IX & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. for R-1& 2. Mr. Harvinder Singh, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.LPA 96/2012 and CM No. 2345/2012 (for condonation of delay in filing the appeal) 1. A writ petition being WP(C) No. 3914/1999 was filed by the appellant against an Award dated 11.08.1998 passed by the Labour Court. The said writ petition was dismissed on 07.02.2007 as no one appeared for the appellant/petitioner even on the second call. CM No. 14710/2010 was then filed by the appellant in the said writ petition for restoration of the appeal. The application for restoration of the appeal was accompanied by CM No. 14711/2010 for co...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »