Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dharambir Singh (Ex. Const.) Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:05. 03.2013 + W.P.(C) 1260/2000 DHARAMBIR SINGH (EX. CONST.) ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Anil Gautam, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate with Sh. Bhupinder Sharma, DC/OIC (Legal), BSF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner has in the present writ proceeding challenged an order dated 14.12.1998, dismissing him from the services consequent upon the findings of guilt, recorded in the Summary Security Force Court (SSFC). The findings and punishment were approved by the Competent Authority of the Border Security Force (BSF) on 05.03.1999; the petitioners appeal was rejected on 22.11.1999.2. Briefly, the facts are that the petitioner who joined the BSF on W.P.(C)1260/2000 Pag30. 09.1989 - was charged with culpability in respect of an incident which occurred on 31.08.199...
Tara Chand Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : February 18, 2013 DECIDED ON : March 05, 2013 + CRL.A.293/2000 TARA CHAND Through : ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav & Mr.Lokesh Chander, Advocates. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the Crl.A.No.301/2000 titled Manglu Vs. State . (S.P.GARG) JUDGE March 05, 2013 sa file of...
Mrs. Vijaya C. Gursahaney Vs. Delhi Development Aurhority and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 563/2012 MRS. VIJAYA C. GURSAHANEY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Vipin Kumar Gupta, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AURHORITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate. % Date of Decision : March 05, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The Petitioner in the present Writ Petition impugns the demand of the Delhi Development Authority claiming composition fee for enlargement of time for construction of plot bearing not D-3, Community Centre, Naraina, New Delhi-110028.2. The aforesaid plot of land was purchased by one Ram Dhan Bhandula (since deceased) in the public auction held by the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the DDA) on 25.05.1969. A perpetual lease deed of the plot was executed between Ram Dhan and the President of India on 17.02.1972. On 18.09.1978, Ram Dhan died without raising any construction on the said plot. The Petitioner herein Mrs....
Mohd. HusaIn Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL.) NO.102 OF 200.Decided on :5. h March, 2013 MOHD. HUSAIN Through: Petitioner Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Advocate. Versus STATE OF DELHI Through: Respondent Ms. Charu Dalal, Advocate for Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State. IO SI Vijay Pal Singh, P.S. Delhi Cantt. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is a writ petition filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking payment of compensation on account of the alleged custodial death of his son Mohd. Khalid Hussain, aged 21 years, in police custody.2. Briefly stated, the facts as alleged in the petition are that the petitioners son was employed as a civilian pump operator in Subroto Park, Delhi Cantt and in spare time, he was alleged to be working as a Caddy in the Golf Club, Dhaula Kuan, Delhi Cantt. Petitioners elder daughter, Sajida Parveen used to work in the house of one Wing Commander Johri as a domestic servant....
Dda Vs. Banwari Lal Arya
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 137/2013 DDA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Adv. versus BANWARI LAL ARYA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Surendra Kumar and Mr. A.K. Babar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 05.03.2013 CM No.3851/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM No.3852/2013 (delay) This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. In view of the submissions made therein, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. LPA 137/2013 & CM No.3853/2013 (stay) In December, 1989, the respondent before us applied for allotment of a flat under Dr. Ambedkar Awas Yozna-1989 of the appellant and a flat was allotted to him on 21.8.2001. In the application form, the respondent had given two addresses, one as his permanent address and the other as his postal address. The ...
Avnija Ahluwalia (Minor) Through:next Friend Simra Vs. Vikaas Ahluwali ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h March, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.1990/2011 AVNIJA AHLUWALIA (MINOR) THROUGH: NEXT FRIEND SIMRAN & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Prasoon Kumar & Mr. Deepak, Chander, Advs. Versus VIKAAS AHLUWALIA Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aniruddha Chaudhary, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J I.A. No.11046/2009 (u/Ss 18 & 20 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956) 1. The two plaintiffs who are the wife and minor daughter (now aged about 11 years) of the defendant, in this suit for recovery of maintenance under Sections 18 & 20 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, seek interim maintenance @ Rs.5,00,000/- per month with effect from March, 2008 with escalation of 15% per annum and a residence for the plaintiffs or in lieu thereof a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- per month towards rent.2. The counsel for the plaintiffs has argued that the defendant is the only legal hei...
Mohd.Asfaq Vs. Akhand Bharat Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:5. h March, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 3455/2011 MOHD.ASFAQ Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Randhir Jain, Adv. with Mr. Dhananjai Jain, Adv. versus AKHAND BHARAT CHIT FUND PVT. LTD. ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Mittal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The present Petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in CRL.M.C. 3410/2011 titled SADIAQ HUSAIN V. AKHAND BHARAT CHIT FUND PVT. LTD.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE MARCH 05 2013 vk...
Manglu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : February 18, 2013 DECIDED ON : March 05, 2013 + CRL.A.301/2000 MANGLU Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Javed Hashmi, Advocate. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CRL.A.293/2000 TARA CHAND Through : ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav & Mr.Lokesh Chander, Advocates. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. AND + CRL.A.321/2000 RAJESH SHUKLA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.S.D.S.Rathi, Advocate. versus STATE Through : Crl.A.Nos.301-00, 293-00 & 321-00 ..... Respondent Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. Page 1 of 12 CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Manglu (A-1), Tara Chand (A-2) and Rajesh Shukla (A-3) impugn their conviction and sentence in Sessions Case No.139/1997 arising out of FIR No.569/1994 registered at Police Station Shakarpur by which they were held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 394/34 IPC read with Section 397 IPC and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment ...
Jai Bhagwan and ors Vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 140/2013 JAI BHAGWAN & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Adv. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 05.03.2013 CM 3882/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM 3881/2013 (delay) This is an application for condonation of delay of 179 days in filing the appeal. In view of the submissions made therein, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. LPA 140/2013 page 1 of 4 LPA 140/2013 The appellants before us raised an industrial dispute alleging illegal termination of their services by the respondent. The said dispute being referred to the Labour Court for adjudication, the said Court vide award dated 24.12.2002 held that though they had failed to prove that the termination o...
Sh. S.K.Sharma Vs. School of Planning and Architecture and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.3648/1992 % March 05, 2013 SH. S.K.SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. G.D.Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K.Gupta & Mr. Vikram Singh, Advs. versus SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.K.Singh with Ms. Deepa Rai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner-Sh.S.K.Sharma challenges the order dated 25.9.1992 of the respondent No.1-School of Planning and Architecture terminating the services of the petitioner during the period of probation.2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed by the respondent No.1 as a Senior Librarian vide appointment letter dated 12 th March, 1991. The letter of appointment dated 12.3.1991 specifically provided that the petitioner will be on a probation period of one year which may be extende...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »