Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ritu Kaushal Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3857/2012 Reserved on :25. h February, 2013. Pronounced on:6. h March, 2013 % RITU KAUSHAL Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. M.A.Niyazi and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates. VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Bandana Shukla, Adv. for Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J 1.By this writ petition, the petitioner, who is a teacher in the respondent no.3-school (Army Public School), challenges the order of the respondent No.3 in removing her from the post of a Primary Wing Coordinator of the respondent no.3school. This has been done by the respondent no.3-school by passing a resolution of the Managing Committee dated 2.5.2012.2. The petitioner contends that the petitioner was working as a Primary Wing Coordinator with the respondent no.3-school pursuant to the order dated 8.4.20...
Nagaland Industrial Raw Materials and Supply Corpora Vs. Union of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order Delivered on: March 06, 2013 + OMP No.769/2011 NAGALAND INDUSTRIAL RAW MATERIALS & SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Mohit Chadha, Adv. with Mr.James, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ..... Respondents Through Mr.Saqib, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A.No.16576/2011 (for condonation of delay of 2 days in filing the petition) For reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of two days in filing the petition is condoned. The application is disposed of. I.A.No.16577/2011 (for condonation of delay of 112 days in re-filing the petition) 1. The matter is listed for hearing today. Yet another adjournment is sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The same is strongly opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents who submits that despite of various opportunities granted to the petitioners counsel to argue the petition, he is reluctant to a...
State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:27. 02.2013 Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2013 W.P.(C) No.461/2012 STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. ....Petitioner Through: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Manjusha Wadhwa, Mr.Arpan Wadhawan, Mr.Vivek Ojha & Mr.Amit Panigrahi, Advocates. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. Through: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjiv Kakra and Mr.Atul Kumar & Mr.Bharat Arora for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 On 20.01.1997 the State Trading Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) invited tenders for purchase of argentine wheat. The offer made by Tradigrain (hereinafter referred to as the respondent no.3) was accepted by the petitioner. 2 Parties entered into a contract on 04.02.1997. In terms of this contract respondent no.3 was to give a Performance Guarantee to the petitioner to ensure the due performance of its obligation under the contract. It w...
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Bandana Mukherjee
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on : Judgment pronounced on :04. 03.2013 06.03.2013 LPA No.1250/2007 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Rajiv Bansal with Mr. Devvrat Singh Raghav, Advs. versus BANDANA MUKHERJEE Through : .... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor with Ms. Medha Sachdev, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The respondent before this Court got herself registered for allotment of a flat under New Pattern Registration Scheme (NPRS), 1979. In the registration form, the respondent disclosed her address as F2249, Netaji Nagar, New Delhi. The respondent being a housewife, no residential address of her own was disclosed in the application form, but she gave the occupational address of her husband in the application form. On death of her husband on 22.7.1991, the respondent shifted from F-2249, Netaji Nagar to E-1500, Netaji Nagar, New Delhi. She, however, did not intimate the change of...
Saket Aggarwal Vs. Directorate of Revenue
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h March, 2013 + CRL.M.C.1752/2012 SAKET AGGARWAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur with Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Advocates Versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by an order dated 16.07.2011 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM), New Delhi, the Petitioner seeks to invoke the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Code) to set aside the summoning order and quashing of the complaint for an offence punishable under Section 174 and 175 of Indian Penal Code(IPC).2. As per the averments made in the Petition, one M/s. Kartik Traders having its office at S-27, Brindavan Garden, Sahibabad imported 22400 kgs of dry medicinal herb material Inula Racemosa and 400 kgs of dry medicinal herb material Chinese Ginseng which arrived at ...
Manoj Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
$~4 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: March 06, 2013 W.P.(C) 5203/2012 ..... Petitioner UMESH BARTHWAL Represented by: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sourabh Ahuja and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Advocate with Mr.Sachin Chopra and Mr.Anjum Javed, Advocates W.P.(C) 5206/2012 ..... Petitioner RAKESH KOTHIYAL Represented by: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sourabh Ahuja and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Advocate with Mr.Sachin Chopra, Advocate W.P.(C) 5207/2012 ..... Petitioner SANJEEV SHOKEEN Represented by: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sourabh Ahuja and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS W.P.(C) No.5203/2012 & conn.matters ..... Respondents Page 1 of 12 Represented by: Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Advocate with Mr.Sachin Chopra, Advocate W.P.(C) 5208/2012 ..... Petitioner MANOJ...
Kuldeep Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
$~4 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: March 06, 2013 W.P.(C) 5203/2012 ..... Petitioner UMESH BARTHWAL Represented by: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sourabh Ahuja and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Advocate with Mr.Sachin Chopra and Mr.Anjum Javed, Advocates W.P.(C) 5206/2012 ..... Petitioner RAKESH KOTHIYAL Represented by: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sourabh Ahuja and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Advocate with Mr.Sachin Chopra, Advocate W.P.(C) 5207/2012 ..... Petitioner SANJEEV SHOKEEN Represented by: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sourabh Ahuja and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS W.P.(C) No.5203/2012 & conn.matters ..... Respondents Page 1 of 12 Represented by: Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Advocate with Mr.Sachin Chopra, Advocate W.P.(C) 5208/2012 ..... Petitioner MANOJ...
Ram Gopal Vs. State (Nct, Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h February, 2013 DECIDED ON :6. h March, 2013 + CRL.A.561/1999 RAM GOPAL Through : ....Appellant Mr.Javed Ahmed, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT, DELHI) .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant- Ram Gopal challenges conviction under Section 397/34 IPC in Sessions Case No.97/1998 arising out of FIR No. 166/1994 PS Vivek Vihar. Vide order dated 07.09.1999, he was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine ` 5,000/-.2. On the night intervening 13/14.06.1994, Daily Diary (DD) was recorded at Police Post Anaj Mandi on getting information of dacoity in House No.5/34, Bara Bazar, Shahdara. SI Surender Dev with police staff went to the spot. He recorded statement of Vinod Kumar Bansal who disclosed that at around 03.00 A.M., five boys entered the house; two were having knives; two were armed with iron rod and one was having iron punja. He named Ram Gopal @ Kalia who u...
Manoj Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
$~4 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: March 06, 2013 W.P.(C) 5203/2012 ..... Petitioner UMESH BARTHWAL Represented by: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sourabh Ahuja and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Advocate with Mr.Sachin Chopra and Mr.Anjum Javed, Advocates W.P.(C) 5206/2012 ..... Petitioner RAKESH KOTHIYAL Represented by: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sourabh Ahuja and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Advocate with Mr.Sachin Chopra, Advocate W.P.(C) 5207/2012 ..... Petitioner SANJEEV SHOKEEN Represented by: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sourabh Ahuja and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS W.P.(C) No.5203/2012 & conn.matters ..... Respondents Page 1 of 12 Represented by: Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Advocate with Mr.Sachin Chopra, Advocate W.P.(C) 5208/2012 ..... Petitioner MANOJ...
M/S. Aster Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. M/S. Saurabh Buildcon P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 03.2013 + RFA (OS)18/2013, C.M. APPL.1624-1625/2013 & 3667/2013 M/S. ASTER TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. & ANR ...... Appellants Through : Sh. Anil Kher, Sr. Advocate with Sh. D.R. Bhatia and Sh. Ankur Bansal, Advocate. versus M/S. SAURABH BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Sh. U.K. Shandilya, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the appellants that the rent liability for the past period, i.e. till 30.09.2010 was the subject matter of a notice by the Income Tax authorities. It is submitted that consequent to it, certain amounts were paid, the details of which are provided in para 3(i)(a) of C.M. Appl. 3667/2013. It is, therefore, stated that the amounts towards damages/mesne profits are outstanding and payable for the period October 2010 onwards. Having regard to these facts, learned cou...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »