Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 08 2013

Raj Kumar Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2013

$-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :8. h March, 2013 + CRL.A. 63/2006 & CRL.M.A.3410/2012 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr.Shiv Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. ASI Sant Ram, PS Kotwali. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Raj Kumar has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and order on sentence dated 15.02.2005 of Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi by which he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 20 NDPS Act and sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 10 years with fine of ` 1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for a period of six months.2. The appellant was apprehended by the police of PS Chandani Chowk vide FIR No.224/2003 and challaned for committing offence punishable under Sections 20/61/85 NDPS Act. It was alleged that the appellant was found in possession of total 4 kg 35 ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2013

Sudershan Kumar JaIn Vs. Sh. Kuldip Kumar JaIn and anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h March, 2013. % + CS(OS) 1088/2008 SUDERSHAN KUMAR JAIN Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. T.K. Tiwari & Mr. Shakti Kant Patnaik, Advs. Versus SH. KULDIP KUMAR JAIN & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y.P. Ahuja, Adv. for D-1. Ms. Anshu Aggarwal, Adv. for D-2 Mr. Rahul Srivastava, Adv. for Ms. Suparna Srivatava, Adv. for MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA Nos.7459/2011 (of plaintiff and D-1 u/O 2.R-3 CPC), 3500/2012 (of D-2 u/O 2.R-3&3 A CPC & u/S 4.of the Evidence Act), IA No.3501/2012 (of D-2 u/S 15.CPC) & 13551/2012 (of D-2 u/O 4.R-1&2 CPC) in CS(OS) No.1088/2008 1. Plaintiff has filed this suit, (i) for partition of shops bearing No.4277, 4278, 4279, 4281, 4282, 4283 and Katra property bearing No.4280, Main Bazar, Paharganj, New Delhi; (ii) for injunction restraining defendant No.1 from raising any construction in property No.4280 and from alienating / transferring / parting with possession of the same; an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2013

Op Garg and ors. Vs. Ndmc

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: March 08, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1569/2013 OP GARG & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.H.P.Chakravorti, Advocate. versus NDMC Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Rachna Golchha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. O.P.Bhalotra No.2274/1982. and 9 office colleagues filed W.P.(C) The 10th petitioner in the writ petition was the SSSA Accountants Association. The claim in the writ petition was against the Municipal Corporation of Delhi with respect to a resolution passed by the Corporation on October 03, 1993. At the core of the issue was entitlement to be paid salary in the higher pay scale for those who had passed the Subordinate Supervision of Statutory Audit Examination (SSSA Examination). Seniority list was affected and so were the wages.2. Disposing of the writ petition on September 24, 1983, relief was granted to the writ petitioners, and ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2013

Krofta Engineering Ltd. Vs. Hermes Properties Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h March, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.2737/2011 KROFTA ENGINEERING LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal with Mr. Salil Seth & Mr. Debarshi Dutta, Advs. Versus HERMES PROPERTIES LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Gyanendra Agarwal, Adv. for D-4. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The plaintiff has sued for declaration that the invocation by the defendants of the Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG) dated 03.09.2008 is invalid, illegal, null and void and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from taking any steps in pursuance to the said invocation. A decree for recovery of Rs.1,42,363/- along with interest at 12% per annum is also sought jointly and severally against the defendants.2. Summons of the suit and notice of the application for interim relief were issued and vide ex parte ad-interim order dated 08.11.2011, on the condition of the plaintiff depositing an amount of Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2013

Harish Kumar Vs. the Hmt Limited and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2013

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No. 4449/2011 & CM Nos. 9069/2011, 8880/2012, 5300/2012 8th March, 2013 % HARISH KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Advocate. versus THE HMT LIMITED & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. C.V. Francis, Mr. Arun Francis, Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is the employee of the respondent No.2/HMT Watches Limited. Petitioner is presently working at the post of Assistant General Manager. The petitioner claims two reliefs by way of this writ petition. First is challenging his order of transfer from Delhi to Jaipur. Second relief prayed for is to direct the respondent No. 2 to consider his application for voluntary retirement under the scheme dated 02.09.2010.2. So far as the second aspect of grant of VRS is concerned, the respondent No. 2 has denied that there is any VRS scheme as applicable on date with re...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2013

Babu Lal Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-07-2013

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 850/2012 OM PRAKASH ..... Appellant versus + DDA AND ORS. LPA 851/2012 .... Respondents SURESH KUMAR ..... Appellant versus DDA AND ORS ..... Respondents + LPA 852/2012 SANT PLASTIC COMPANY ..... Appellant versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ..... Respondents + LPA 853/2012 KISHORI LAL ..... Appellant versus DDA AND ORS ..... Respondent + LPA 855/2012 KULWANT SINGH ..... Appellant versus LPA 850/2012 page 1 of 8 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. ..... Respondents + LPA 856/2012 KARTAR SINGH ..... Appellant versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR . .... Respondents + LPA 858/2012 UMED SINGH ..... Appellant versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ..... Respondent + LPA 860/2012 SOHAN LAL ..... Appellant versus DDA AND ANR ..... Respondent + LPA 869/2012 HANUMAN BUSWALA ..... Appellant versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ..... Respondent LPA 850/2012 page 2 of 8 + LPA 870/2012 AJIT KUMAR ..... Appellant versus DDA AND ORS ..... ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2013

Suresh Kumar Vs. Dda and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-07-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2013

New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Dayal Singh and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-07-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. No.419/2010 % Judgment reserved on:4. h March, 2013 Judgment delivered on:7. h March, 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shalini Upadhyay, Advocate. Versus DAYAL SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Amit Kumar Pandey, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 24.04.2010, whereby the learned Tribunal has awarded a total compensation of Rs.3,75,000/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum including interim award, if any, from the date of filing the petition till issuance of notice under Order 21 Rule 1 CPC.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company has submitted that since the claim petition filed before the learned Tribunal was under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, therefore, the claimants were supposed to prove the rash and negligent act of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2013

Ganga Ram Vs. Dda and anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-07-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2013

Som Dutt Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-07-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:07. 03.2013 + W.P.(C) 336/2013 SOM DUTT ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. A.K. Trivedi, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Standing Councel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % FACTS 1 The petitioner challenges his non-appointment to the post of Constable (GD) pursuant to a common recruitment test held in 2012, and seeks appropriate directions for the processing of his candidature, leading to appointment to that post.2. The petitioner states that he was born on 08.03.1991 had applied for the post of Constable (GD) in CAPF Examination, 2012 under the OBC category for the Delhi State and had cleared the written examination with a score of 64 marks, following which he was issued an admission certificate for medical examination which declared him to be fit. However, when the results were announced, W.P.(C)336...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.