Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Adobe Systems Inc. and ors. Vs. Mr. SachIn Naik and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2604/2008 & I.A. 15413/2008 ADOBE SYSTEMS INC. & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Safia Said, Advocate. versus MR. SACHIN NAIK & ORS. Through: None. ..... Defendants Date of Decision:12. h March, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Upon the present suit being filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, rendition of accounts, damages and delivery up plaintiffs' unlicensed software, this Court by an ad-interim ex parte order dated 16th December, 2008 restrained the defendants, its employees, agents, servants etc. from using the plaintiffs' unlicensed software till the next date of hearing.2. By the said order, the Court also appointed a Local Commissioner, who in her report, has stated that thirty-three computer softwares by the defendants were installed with pirated softwares of plaintiffs No. 1 and 3.3. Since despite service, defendants failed to appear, they were pr...
Smt. Swati Verma Vs. Mr. Jagdish Baweja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h March, 2013 CS(OS) 610/2005 % + SMT. SWATI VERMA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Kishore M. Gajaria & Mr. Piyush Sachdeva, Advs. versus MR. JAGDISH BAWEJA Through: ..... Defendants None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW 1 This suit was originally filed by one Sh. Sanjay Panda against the now sole defendant Shri Jagdish Baweja and the now sole plaintiff Smt. Swati Verma, for specific performance of an Agreement dated 9 th July, 2004 by the said Shri Jagdish Baweja for sale of property no.E-78, DDA Flat, Ground Floor, Malviya Nagar Extension, Saket, New Delhi to the said Shri Sanjay Panda for a total sale consideration of Rs.32,50,000/-. The now sole plaintiff Smt. Swati Verma was impleaded as defendant no.2 in the suit averring that Sh. Jagdish Baweja had subsequently vide Agreement to Sell dated 20 th April, 2005 agreed to sell the same flat to the said Smt. Swati Verma. Accordingly, relief of declaring the Agreem...
Dinesh Dutt Sharma Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : February 27, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : March 11, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5044/2012 DINESH DUTT SHARMA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Ravi Kant Jain, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Represented by: None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On October 13, 1964 the petitioner was appointed as Workshop Instructor in the Directorate of Training and Technical Education, a body established by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi and was deputed to a Polytechnic established by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi to discharge duties of a Workshop Instructor. The petitioner, as the name of the post would indicate, had to be at the workshop/laboratory of the Polytechnic, where practical training was imparted to the students. The petitioner admits said fact that at the workshop/laboratory of the Polytechnic he would participate i...
Surender Pal Anand Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.M.C. 3168/2010 + Date of Decision:11. h March, 2013 # ! SURENDER PAL ANAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.C. Mittal, Advocate versus $ * STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State Mr. R.S. Nirwal, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: By way of this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 the petitioner-accused seeks quashing of the order dated 16th April, 2010 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in a criminal complaint under Section 200 Cr. P.C. filed by respondent no.1 herein against him and his wife as well as against her own husband whereby the petitioner was summoned as an accused for the commission of the offence complainant and complainants husband was ordered to be summoned for the commission of offences under Sections 323/506(II)/34 IPC.2. The relevant facts of the case noticed by the Magistrate and his findings in the order...
Daljeet Singh Vs. Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.14008/2009 % March 11, 2013 DALJEET SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Shohit Chaudhary, proxy counsel. versus DELHI SIKH GURUDWARA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anshul Gupta proxy counsel for Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate for respondent No.5 with Mr. Amarjit Singh, Accountant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.14008/09 and C.M. No.16030/09 (directions) 1. The issue in the present case is of payment of monetary emoluments to the employee of a school in terms of report of Sixth Pay Commission and which was directed to be implemented by the Director of Education vide its order dated 11.2.2009.2. I have dealt with this issue in many judgments and last of which is the judgment in the case of T.P. Singh Vs. Guru Harkrishan Public School and Ors. in W.P.(C) No.12132/2009 decided on 14.2.2013 wherein I have directed that t...
Joga Singh Vs. Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.13986/2009 % March 11, 2013 JOGA SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Shohit Chaudhary, proxy counsel. versus DELHI SIKH GURUDWARA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anshul Gupta proxy counsel for Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate for respondent No.4 with Mr. Amarjit Singh, Accountant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.13986/09 and C.M. No.15997/09 (directions) 1. The issue in the present case is of payment of monetary emoluments to the employee of a school in terms of report of Sixth Pay Commission and which was directed to be implemented by the Director of Education vide its order dated 11.2.2009.2. I have dealt with this issue in many judgments and last of which is the judgment in the case of T.P. Singh Vs. Guru Harkrishan Public School and Ors. in W.P.(C) No.12132/2009 decided on 14.2.2013 wherein I have directed that the ...
M/S Rainbow Electric Supply Co. Vs. North Delhi Power Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Delivered on: March 11, 2013 OMP No.888/2012 & I.A. No.17241/2012 M/S RAINBOW ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. .....Petitioner Through Mr.Prithvi Pal, Proxy Counsel. versus NORTH DELHI POWER LTD. & ANR. ....Respondents Through Mr. K. Datta, Adv. with Mr. Manish Srivastav & Mr. Satyajit S. Rana, Advs. For R-1 AND + OMP No.889/2012 & I.A. No.17244/2012 M/S RAINBOW ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. .....Petitioner Through Mr.Prithvi Pal, Proxy Counsel. versus NORTH DELHI POWER LTD. & ANR. ....Respondents Through Mr. K. Datta, Adv. with Mr. Manish Srivastav & Mr. Satyajit S. Rana, Advs. For R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. OMP No.888/2012 has been filed challenging Award dated 13th March, 2008. OMP No.888/2012 & OMP No.889/2012 the final Arbitral Rs.72,73,103.00 with interest @10% per annum from the date of the award till payment has been awarded in favour of North Delhi Power Limited (hereinafter referred to as NDPL). ND...
Vinesh Chandra Saxena Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 148/2013 VINESH CHANDRA SAXENA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Ankur Chibber, Advocate. versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Archana Gaur, Advocate for R.1/UOI. Mr.Digvijay Rai, Advocate for R.2 & 3. % CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER 08 03.2013 1. The appellant, while he was working as Manager(Accounts) with the respondent Airport Authority of India, a criminal case was registered against him by CBI for accepting bribe of Rs.5000/- from a furniture repair contractor. He was arrested and prosecuted for the offences under Sections 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d) of the Prevention and Corruption Act. Vide order dated 25th April, 2009 passed by the learned Special Judge, Delhi, the appellant was convicted in the aforesaid case and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/-, or in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. Being aggrieved fr...
Kaushalendra Kumar Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :05. 03.2013 Judgment pronounced on :08. 03.2013 LPA No. 686/2012 & CM No. 17645/2012 KAUSHALENDRA KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr Subrat Deb, Adv. Versus DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD .... Respondent Through: Ms Mirza Amir Baig for Mr Anjum Javed, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The appellant before us belongs to Ahir Community, which is stated to have been recognized as a backward class, vide Government of NCT of Delhi Notification dated 20.01.1995. He also claims to be a visually handicapped person. In February, 2008, Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi, invited applications for appointment of teachers in Delhi. LPA No. 686/2012 requirement stipulated in the said advertisement was that they should obtain OBC Certificate, issued by Government of NCT of Delhi. The appellant applied in response to the aforesaid advertisement and appeared...
R.K. Sharma Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.9025/2011 % March 08, 2013 R.K. SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. V.P. Sharma, Advocate. versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Sakshi Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Counsel for the petitioner has been heard on the main writ petition.2. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks the relief of promotion on account of his having cleared the written test for Scale III and so declared vide list dated 28.2.2008 of the respondent No.1/employer. Petitioner is placed at serial No.75 of this list of candidates who have cleared the written test.3. On being asked as to what are the rules which govern the promotion from Scale-II to Scale-III, and which relief the petitioner is seeking, counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the criteria for promotion which are given at running pages...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »