Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Real Lifestyle Broadcasting Pvt Ltd Vs. Turner Asia Pacific Ventures I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :06.3.2013 Judgment delivered on:13.03.2013 CO.APP. 18/2013 REAL LIFESTYLE BROADCASTING PVT LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr.Gopal Subramaniam, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Ritin Rai, Mr.Santanam Swaminathan, Ms.Kartika Sharma and Mr.Manu Sanan, Advocates. versus TURNER ASIA PACIFIC VENTURES INC. & ANR. ... Respondents Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rishi Agarawala and Ms.Malavika Lal, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 Company petition No.20 of 2011 was filed jointly by Real Global Broadcasting Pvt. Ltd. (RGB- hereinafter referred to as the transferor company) and Real Lifestyle Broadcasting (RLB-hereinafter referred to as the transferee company/appellant) under Section 391 read with Section 394 of the Companies Act (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) seeking sanction of a scheme the qua shareholders and creditors of the aforesai...
Rajdhar Jha Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3446/2010 & conn. 13th March, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 3446/2010 RAJDHAR JHA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. I.C. Mishra and Ms.Swati Chakraborty, Advocates. versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate for R1. + W.P.(C) 3448/2010 BAIDYANATH MAHTO ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. I.C. Mishra and Ms.Swati Chakraborty, Advocates. versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Dinesh Sharma and Mr. Sachin Datta, Advocates of UOI. Through Mr. Anant Sharma, Adv. for R3. + W.P.(C) 3450/2010 RADHA DEVI ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. I.C. Mishra and Ms.Swati Chakraborty, Advocates. versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. B.V. Niren, Adv. for R1. + W.P.(C) 3987/2010 KISAN MAHTO AND ANR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. I.C. Mishra and Ms.Swati Chakraborty, Advocates. versus UOI AND ORS + ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Rajesh Katyal, Adv. W.P.(C) 3998/2010 SITA RAM MAHTO AND ANR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. I.C. M...
M/S. National Projects Construction Corporation Lt Vs. M/S. R.S. Avtar ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :07. 02.2013 Decided on:13. 03.2013 + FAO(OS) 89/2009 M/S. NATIONAL CORPORATION LTD.. PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION ..... Appellant Through : Sh. Paritosh Budhiraja, Advocate. versus M/S. R.S. AVTAR SINGH & CO. ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Ajay Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of this Court, in CS (OS) 1497/1993 dated 15.10.2008, in respect of objections to an award, made in terms of provisions of the erstwhile (and now repealed) Arbitration Act, 1940.2. The dispute arose between the parties with respect to foodgrain godown construction and was referred to Sh. T.S. Murthy, the Sole Arbitrator by letter dated 04.05.1989 in terms of Clause 36 of the General Conditions of the Contract. The Sole Arbitrator after FAO(OS) 89/2009 Page 1 conducting the proceedings g...
Maya Devi and anr. Vs. Jai Singh Tomar and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R.S.A. No.198 of 2011 & C.M. No.20938/2011 (for stay) Decided on :13. h March, 2013 MAYA DEVI & ANR. Through: Appellants Mr. Ujjwal Kr. Jha, Advocate. Versus JAI SINGH TOMAR & ANR. Respondents Through: None for R-1. Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for R-2/DDA. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellants under Section 100 CPC against the judgment dated 11.7.2011 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge-cum-RC (East), Karkardooma Courts in R.C.A. No.1/2011 dismissing the appeal of the appellants and upholding the judgment dated 8.12.2010 passed by the learned Administrative Civil Judge dismissing the suit of the plaintiffs/appellants.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants had filed a suit bearing No.281/2008 for declaration and permanent injunction against the respondent no.1/Jai Singh Kanwar s/o Late Sh. Om Singh Kanwar and DDA. The case which was setup in the pl...
Balwan Singh Vs. Bhupinder and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 27, 2013 Pronounced on: March 13, 2013 + CRL.REV.P. 314/2007 BALWAN SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate versus BHUPINDER & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT 1 Impugned order of 23rd February, 2007 convicting respondent- accused persons for the offence under Section 324/34 of IPC and sentencing them to the period already undergone with fine of `50,000/- to be disbursed as compensation to the injured, is under challenge in this revision petition by petitioner-injured.2. At the hearing, it was urged on behalf of petitioner that the offence committed in this case falls under Section 326 of IPC whereas respondentaccused persons have been convicted for the offence under Section 324 of IPC which is unwarranted and so this revision petition deserves to be allowed to the extent of altering th...
Union of India and ors Vs. Vinod Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: March 13, 2013. + W.P.(C) 1470/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Katyal, Advocate. versus VINOD AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate with Ms.Minal Sehgal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J (ORAL) 1. The respondent, after serving for 19 years reached the stage of exercising a choice for a posting which he did, resulting in respondent being posted at Delhi for the first time on August 06, 2008; by said date the respondent who had joined as a DFO(M) with the Sasashtra Seema Bal (SSB) on June 22, 1989 had served the organization and the country well for 19 years.2. His grievance was of being transferred out of Delhi as per order dated April 16, 2010. This was within less than two years of he having worked at Delhi. Respondent placed reliance upon the transfer policy which envisages ten...
Jagmohan Bhola Vs. Dilbagh Rai Bhola and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
$-22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. APPEAL NO.793 OF 201.Date of decision :13. h March, 2013 % JAGMOHAN BHOLA Through : ..... APPELLANT Mr. Balvinder Singh, Adv. with Mr. Jagmohan Bhola in person. versus DILBAGH RAI BHOLA AND ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Dinesh Garg, Adv. for R-1 to R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. Mr. Balvinder Singh, learned counsel for the appellant states that he has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the appellant. The appellant is also present in person. The appellant has handed over a compromise deed dated 31st January, 2013 which has been signed by all the respondents as well as by Smt. Chanchal Bhola (ex-wife of Jagmohan Bhola). On instructions from Mr. Jagmohan Bhola, Mr. Balvinder Singh states that in view of the said compromise he seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal. There is no legal impediment to grant the prayer made before us.2. This appeal is dismissed a...
Ravi Shankar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. Appeal No. 1097/2012 Reserved on:25. h February, 2013 Date of Decision:13th March, 2013 % RAVI SHANKAR Through ....Appellant Mr. Sumer Kumar Sethi, Advocate. Versus STATE Through Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.The appellant Ravi Shankar by the impugned judgment dated 21st December 2010 has been convicted under Section 363/366/302 IPC for kidnapping the minor girl S (name withheld), aged 5, with intent of having an illicit intercourse, and thereafter strangulating her to death. By order of sentence dated 13th January 2011, the appellant has been sentenced, under Section 302 IPC, to undergo life imprisonment, and to make payment of fine of Rs 10000/-, in default of which he is to undergo RI for six months. Under Section 366 IPC he is to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and pay fine of Rs 5000/-, in default of which, he shall undergo SI ...
Prem Chand Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : March 13, 2013 + WP (C) 7755/2011 PREM CHAND Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Arun Sukhija, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Sangeeta Tomar, Advocate for R-1, 2, 3 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The writ petitioner started working as a Chowkidar with the Post and Telegraph Department at its head post office Shamli, District Muzzfarnargar, UP on July 01, 1976 on casual daily rate basis and continued to work till he was conferred a temporary status on November 29, 1989 and the benefit was the petitioner receiving salary in the same pay-scale with allowances as was paid to regular employees, but without being a regular employee.2. On April 12, 1991 the Department of Posts introduced a scheme called Casual Labourers (Temporary Status and Regularization) Scheme which envisaged permanency to be accorded t...
Devender Kumar Gupta Vs. Delhi Transport Corporati0n
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 13, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2417/2012 DEVENDER KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K.Mishra and Mr.Ajay Tiwari, Advocates. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATI0N ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J (Oral) 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 28.03.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) whereby Original Application No.921 of 2012 filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. The cadre posts under DTC are : Hindi (Translator) > Office Superintendent (Hindi) > Manager (Hindi).3. One Ram Avtar Sharma was working as Office Superintendent (Hindi). He was fighting a battle to be promoted to the post of Manager (Hindi). He succeeded and obtained promotion with retrospective effect by order of the Central Administrative Trib...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »