Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Raju Aiyer Vs. Jawahar Lal Nehru University and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.2541/2011 % March 13, 2013 S. RAJU AIYER Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate with Mr. W.A. Nomani, Advocate. versus JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by one Sh. S. Raju Aiyer challenging the findings of the enquiry committee dated 19.2.2010, order of the disciplinary authority dated 29.7.2010 and of the appeals committee dated 29.11.2010, all of which have found the petitioner guilty of sexual harassment of the respondent No.5 and have consequently imposed and approved the penalty against the petitioner of compulsory retirement without any reduction in financial benefits.2. Before I proceed to the facts of the case, it is necessary to state that this Court while hearing the writ petition under Article 226 of t...
islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines Vs. the Projects and Equipment ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 1285/2002 Date of Decision:13. .03.2013 ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN SHIPPING LINES ..PLAINTIFF Through: Mr.N.Ganpathy, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Seth, Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advocates. Versus THE PROJECTS AND EQUIPMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED ...DEFENDANT Through: Mr.Sanjeev Narula, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. This is a suit for recovery of money. The plaintiff is a foreign company owned by the Republic of Iran. The Government Trading Corporation of Iran (for short the GTC) had entered into a contract with the defendant for purchase of rice. The terms and conditions between the GTC and the defendant were recorded in telex dated 10.05.1998. In pursuance thereto, the plaintiff was entrusted the shipment of the goods from India to Tehran. There being delay in shipment of goods at the Kandla port in India, the plaintiff has claimed from defendant the demurrage amounting to USD 101,000/- along with interest, whic...
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Ramesh Chand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: March 13, 2013 + W.P.(C) 300/2013 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus RAMESH CHAND Represented by: ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. As per the net tracking report the registered docket containing the notice and the writ petition which was issued pursuant to the order dated January 21, 2013 has been received by the respondent.2. None appears for the respondent in spite of the matter being passed over once and called out for a second time.3. The principal grievance of the petitioner is that O.A.No.1159/2011, filed by the respondent, was allowed by the Tribunal without notice to the writ petitioner.4. We had summoned the record of the Tribunal and the same would reveal that O.A.No.1159/2011 was listed for admission on March 25, 2011 before a Bench comprising Honble M...
Social Jurist Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2866/2002 SOCIAL JURIST Through: Mr.Ashok Ms.Nisha Tomar, Adv. Versus % ..... Petitioner Aggarwal, Adv. with GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Adv. with Ms.Sana Ansari, Adv. for R-1/GNCT of Delhi. Mr.Sanjeeve Kr. Dubey, Adv. with Ms.Zeenat Masoodi, Adv. for L&DO. Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Adv. for R/UOI. Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. for DDA. Mr.Anoop Bagai, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sumeet Anand, Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advs. for PSRI Hospital. Mr.A.K.Singla, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Mridul Gupta, Adv. for Sunder Lal Jain Hospital & Amar Jyoti Hospital. Ms.Renu Gupta, Adv. for Ganga Ram Hospital. Mr.Lalit Bhasin, Adv. with Ms.Ratna Dhingra, Ms.Bhavna Dhami, Ms.Sneha Balakrishnan, Advs. for RGCRI Hospital. Mr.Rajeev Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Uddyam Mukherjee, Adv. for St. Stephens Hospital. Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sajad Sultan and Mr. Amitesh Mishra, Adv. for R9,10,41,11,35 and 36. CORAM: HON'BLE TH...
Mohan Singh (Died) Through His Lrs Vs. Mahendra Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 1972/2003 Date of Decision:13.03.2013 MOHAN SINGH (DIED) THROUGH HIS LRs ...PLAINTIFF Through: Mr. Rahul Shukla and Ms. Bachita Baruah, Advocates. Versus MAHENDRA SINGH & ORS. Through: ...DEFENDANTS Mr. G.S. Shukla, Advocate for defendant Nos. 1,2 & 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. This is a suit for partition of properties and recovery of possession of one room on the ground floor of premises bearing No. B389, Gali No. 4, Majlis Park, Delhi. The present suit was initially filed by Mohan Singh against his brothers Mahendra Singh, Sujan Singh, Arjun Singh and sister Shashi Bala (defendants No. 1 to 4 respectively). The defendant No. 2 Sujan Singh died during the pendency of the suit and his wife Sarbansh Kaur was impleaded in his place. The defendant Arjun Singh also died and was substituted by his wife and sons. The case of the plaintiff was that three properties bearing No. B-389, 290 A-Block and 291 A-Block, all...
Gnct of Delhi, Delhi Fire Service Vs. Bholla Dutt Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : February 06, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on :March 13, 2013 W.P.(C) 3318/2010 + GNCT OF DELHI, DELHI FIRE SERVICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate versus BHOLLA DUTT SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.V.K.Rao, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Piyush Gaur and Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The instant matter relates to pay-scales of posts in the Wireless Section of the Communication Wing of the Delhi Fire Service, the hierarchical structure wherein was as under when the recommendations of the 4th Central Pay Commission were received by the Government and at the relevant time the Delhi Fire Service was under the administrative control of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi:Wireless Officer I I I I Assistant Wireless Officer Assistant Wireless Officer (Operational) (Maintenance) I I Asstt. Mobilizing...
CaptaIn Kersy Ratonsha Driver Vs. Nepc India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:07.03.2013 Judgment delivered on 13.03.2013 FAO(OS) 293/2011 CAPTAIN KERSY RATONSHA DRIVER ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Janendra Lal and Ms . Yashmin Tarapore, Advocates. versus NEPC INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ajay Kumar Agarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal encompasses a short point. Question raised is on the territorial jurisdiction of the Delhi Courts. Impugned order had returned a finding that under Section 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the said Code) Delhi Courts would have the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit. 2 The plaintiff (M/s NEPC India Ltd.) has filed a suit for damages claiming a sum of Rs. 50 lacs alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff on account of the illegal grounding of its aircraft pursuant to an order passed by the Bombay High Court on 2...
Mtnl and anr. Vs. R.K.Gupta and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 13, 2013 WP (C) 5299/2010 MTNL & ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate versus R.K.GUPTA & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.K.P.Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The first respondent was placed under suspension vide order dated January 04, 2001. He was charge sheeted on February 03, 2003. Pending inquiry, the suspension order was revoked on March 15, 2003.2. Another vigilance inquiry commenced against the first respondent in which pending investigation, he was suspended on March 28, 2004.3. With respect to the charge sheet issued on February 03, 2003, to which we shall refer to as the first charge sheet, upon being held guilty, penalty of compulsory retirement was inflicted upon the first respondent on November 29, 2004, and needless to state on said date the first respondent was under suspe...
M/S. Angelique International Limited Vs. M/S. Transasia Forwarders (In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 1986/2003 Date of Decision:13. 03.2013 M/S. ANGELIQUE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ...PLAINTIFF Through: Mr.Rakesh K.Sharma, Adv. with Ms.Kusum Sanehi, Ms.Richa Kaur, Ms.Swati Yadav, Advs. Versus M/S. TRANSASIA FORWARDERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ANR. ...DEFENDANT Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. This suit for recovery is filed by the plaintiff against the defendants seeking recovery of suit amount of Rs. 25,85,135.75/-. The facts in brief are that the plaintiff had sent seventeen containers of medicines and equipments from India to Mangolia for its customer i.e. Ministry of Health of Mangolia. The defendant No. 1 is a Delhi based Indian associate of defendant No.2 which is based in Germany. The defendant No. 1 had issued freight invoices in respect of the said containers on taking complete payment of freight of USD 2655./- for transportation. The containers were to go by sea at Chinese port Xingang and thereafter...
Sh.Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, Intelligence Officer, Na Vs. BenjamIn David ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:23. d January, 2013 DECIDED ON :13. h March, 2013 + CRL.L.P.98/2007, CRL.M.A.Nos.6277/2007 & 10173/2007 SH.AKHILESH KUMAR MISHRA, INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ....Petitioner Through : Mr.Rajesh Manchanda, Spl.PP with Mr.Rajat Manchanda, Advocate. VERSUS BENJAMIN DAVID BILLINGTON & ANR. .Respondents Through : Mr.S.S.Das, Advocate with Mr.Sumit Sharma, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Criminal Leave Petition No.98/2007 has been preferred by Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, Intelligence Officer, NCB, Delhi Zonal Unit, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as petitioner) against judgment dated 12.05.2007 of learned Special Judge, NDPS by which the respondents were acquitted of the charges. Notice of Petition was issued to the respondents. Respondent No.1 could not be served as he went abroad after acquittal. Mr.S.S.Das, Advocate put appearance on behalf of the respondent No.2.2. I have heard the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »