Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Glaxosmithkline Pharma Ltd. Vs. Hidustan Medibiotic
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No. 336/2005 Date of Decision:14. 03.2013 GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMA LTD. ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sushant Singh, Mr. P.C. Arya, Mr. V.K. Shukla & Ms. Geetika Kapoor, Advs. Versus HIDUSTAN MEDIBIOTIC Through: ...Defendant Nemo. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff is engaged inter-alia in the manufacture, marketing and world-wide distribution of a wide-range of pharmaceutical, medicinal and veterinary preparations under various trademarks and copyrights. The present suit is with respect to the trademark HITEK and the copyright of the artistic work of the packing material/carton of the product. The plaintiff has contended that it is the proprietor of the said trademark and that the registration of the trademark is pending in the trademark registry vide application No. 1176779 in Class-5. The plaintiff has claimed to be the user of the said trademark since January 2003.2. The plaintiff seeks permanent inju...
Ramdhani Vs. State, Nct Govt.of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
$-33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :14. h March, 2013 + CRL.A. 54/2006 RAMDHANI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Anuj Kr.Ranjan, Advocate. versus STATE, NCT GOVT.OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Ramdhani challenges judgment dated 18.12.2004 and order on sentence dated 03.01.2005 in Sessions Case No.89/2001 arising out of FIR No.281/2001 PS Shalimar Bagh by which he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 397 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine ` 1,000/-. He was further convicted under Section 25/27 Arms Act and sentenced to undergo RI for two years with fine ` 500/-.2. Allegations against the accused were that on 05.05.2001 at 09.20 A.M. at Tikona Park, Pitam Pura, he and his associates- Mahender, Santosh Kumar Aggarwal @ Bhaiya and Pappu robbed complainantKhairatilal of his scooter bearing No. DL 1SK 262.containing ` 60,000...
Sh. Jeet Ram Vs. Oc, Cwg Delhi 2010 and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.1665/2011 % March 14, 2013 SH. JEET RAM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S. Mukherjee, Senior Advocate with Mr. O.P. Aggarwal, Advocate. versus OC, CWG DELHI 201 AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a writ petition filed by the petitioner for stopping the implementation of his transfer orders and for restraining the respondent No.1 from terminating the services of the petitioner. The respondent No.1 is the Organizing Committee of the Commonwealth Games Delhi, 2010.2. The petitioner was admittedly appointed in terms of the appointment letter dated 17.2.2006. This appointment letter reads as Dr. Lalit K Bhanot Secretary General not OC/CWG/Apt./06 17 February 2006 Mr. Jeet Ram, H.not P-29, Sri Niwaspuri, New Delhi-110065 SUB: Appointment as Stenographer With reference to your application, yo...
Bses Yamuna Power Ltd Vs. Raveen JaIn and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 1391/2007 B.S.E.S.RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ANR. ..... Appellants versus KOLMET BUILDERS + ..... Respondent LPA 200/2008 BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. ..... Appellant versus RAVEEN JAIN & ANR Present : ..... Respondents Mr. Anupam Varma, Adv. for the appellants. Mr. Laliet Kumar and Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Advs. for the respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN % ORDER 14 03.2013 Both these appeals are directed against a common judgment dated 05.10.2007, whereby WP(C) No. 17774/2004 filed by Kolmet Builders and WP(C) No. 13889-90/2004 filed by Raveen Jain and another were allowed.2. In the matter of Raveen Jain, one electricity connection was obtained by Raveen Jain in respect of property bearing No. 297, Patparganj, Industrial Area, Delhi, whereas the other connection was obtained by Suneer Jain in respect of property bearing No. 298, Patparganj, Industrial Area, Delhi. Separate bills were being issued by the appell...
Cit Vs. Global Vantedge Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
$~10 to 12 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + + Judgment delivered on:14. 03.2013 ITA 1828/2010 ITA 1829/2010 ITA 1254/2011 CIT ..... Appellant versus GLOBAL VANTEDGE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms Gayatri Verma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr Vikas Srivastava with Mr Jatinder Pal Singh and Parag Mohanty, Advocates. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) These three appeals by the revenue relate to the assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06. The appeals in respect of the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 (ITA No.1828/2010 and 1829/2010) arise out of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals order dated 17.12.2009 passed in ITA Nos.1432 and 2321/Del/2009. The third appeal (ITA No.1254/2011) is in respect of the assessment year 2005-06 and arises out of the Tribunals order dated 06.05.2011 passed in IT...
United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Kuldeep and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:14. h March, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 751/2012 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate. Versus KULDEEP AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) MAC.APP. 751/2012 1. Vide the instant appeal, the appellant has challenged the impugned award dated 07.05.2012 whereby the learned Tribunal has awarded compensation in favour of the respondents/claimants.2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued only on the ground that the learned Tribunal has awarded the compensation contrary to the case of Smt. Sarla Verma & Anr. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121.by considering the brothers and sisters of the deceased as dependents.3. Learned counsel has submitted that moreover in a case of Devi Dutt & Others v. Manish Sharma & Others MAC App. 753/2010 decided on 19.04.2012 w...
Mohd. Ashraf Vs. State of the Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:14. h March, 2013 + CRL.A. 1270/2012 MOHD. ASHRAF ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.J.Bhambhani with Ms. Nisha Bhambhani, Mr. Apurv Chandolia & Ms. Lakshita Sethi, Advocates versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP along with SI Girraj Singh. P.S. Badarpur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This Appeal is directed against a judgment dated 24.08.2012 and an order on sentence dated 27.08.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge(ASJ) in Sessions Case No.117/2006 FIR No.464/2005 P.S. Badarpur whereby the Appellant was held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 363 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for 04 years and to pay a fine of `5,000/- or in default to undergo SI for three months.2. The case of the prosecution can be extracted from paras 2 and 3 of the impugned judgment which is read as under:2. The facts of the case, in brief, are th...
Swatantar Devi and anr Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1396/2012 SWATANTAR DEVI & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Ashwati, Advocate Versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC with Ms. Charu Dalal, Advocate for the Respondents No.1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL % ORDER 14 03.2013 Crl.M.A.3317/2013 1. The Petitioner wants to urge an additional ground that on the basis of the complaint dated 09.03.2013, the police has failed to register a case under Sections 420,406,468,420 IPC read with Section 34 and 120B IPC.2. The Petitioner is permitted to urge the additional ground.3. The Application is disposed of. W.P.(Crl) 1396/2012 4. By virtue of this Petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure(Code), the Petitioner prays for protection of his life and liberty and protection from any threat of blackmail or physical assault at the hands of the Respondents ...
Suraj Vs. State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
$-31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :14. h March, 2013 + CRL.A. 1218/2011, CRL.M.B.1706/2011 & CRL.M.A.6587/2012 SURAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Deepak Vohra, Advocate. versus STATE (G.N.C.T. OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. SI Dharmendra Kumar, PS Nand Nagri. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Suraj impugns judgment dated 24.02.2011 and order on sentence dated 26.02.2011 in Sessions Case No.245/2007 arising out of FIR No.331/2007 PS Nand Nagri by which he was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 363/366/376 IPC and SI for seven years under Section 376 IPC.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 21.04.2007, he kidnapped prosecutrix X (assumed name) and committed rape upon her. It was also alleged that Usha @ Munni and Rahis were also involved in the commission of the said offences. A charge-sheet was submitted against Suraj, Rahis and Usha @ Munni for committi...
Nikunj Developers and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, Environmental D ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
1. The Secretary Environment Department, State of Maharashtra, on 24th April, 2012 vide its order issued final directions under Section 5 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act) read with Environment Impact Assessment Notification dated 14th September, 2006 (for short the notification) directing the Member Secretary, Maharashtra Pollution Control Board to file complaint in the Court of law under Section 19(a) of the Act for the offences committed by M/s. Veena Developers under Section 15 of the Act read with the said notification and to initiate further line of action in Court of law. Aggrieved from the said order M/s. Veena Developers as well as M/s. Nikunj Developers have filed the present appeal (Appeal No. 76 of 2012). This appeal was instituted in the Registry of the Tribunal on 20th September, 2012. The limitation provided under Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (for short the NGT Act) is 30 days. Admittedly, the appeal was filed much beyond ...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »