Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 14 2013

Lalit Kumar Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-14-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3882/2010 14th March, 2013 % LALIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Ms. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocate. versus BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. V.N. Kohra, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking setting aside of the impugned order dated 26.06.2002 reverting the petitioner to substantive cadre of workman. The petitioner at the time of reversion was working as a probationer in the post of an officer.2. Since the language of the letter dated 26.06.2002 would be material for BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. ( A GOVT. OF INDIA ENTERPRISE) Noida Regional Office. CHRS:PROM:1999 June 26. 2002 NOTE TO : MR. LALIT KUMAR STAFF NO. 5261 OFFICER (ON PROBATION) THROUGH: DGM (HR SERVICES) NORTH Dear Sir, YOURSELF : REVERSION TO SUBSTANTIVE CADRE We refer to our letter Ref. CHRS.RC.IS9...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2013

Tejpal Singh Saathi Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-14-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :7. h March, 2013 DECIDED ON :14. h March, 2013 + BAIL APPLICATION NO.1768/2011 & CRL.M.A.Nos.6754/2012, 13149/2012 & 13167/2012 TEJPAL SINGH SAATHI ....Petitioner Through : Mr.K.K.Sud, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Jayant K.Sud, Mr.Vishal Dabas & Mr.Chirag Khurana, Advocates. versus .Respondent STATE Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The petitioner has filed application for anticipatory bail in case FIR No.144/2011 registered under Section 193/420/467/471/120B IPC at PS EOW. Status report has been filed by the State.2. I have heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, Senior Counsel for the complainant and learned APP, and have examined the record. Counsel for the petitioner urged that the dispute with the complainant is primarily a civil dispute for which he has already filed suit for Declaration, Partition, Injunction and Rendition of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2013

Union of India and ors Vs. Kamal Kumar L.R.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-14-2013

$~16 to 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on : March 12, 2013 Judgment pronounced on : March 14,2013 LPA 531/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : ..... Appellants Mr. Baldev Malik, Adv. versus KAMAL KUMAR ..... Respondent Through : + Mr. L.P.Dhir and Mr.Vikas Nautiyal, Advs. LPA 532/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : ..... Appellants Mr. Baldev Malik, Adv. versus KAMAL KUMAR ..... Respondent Through : + Mr. L.P.Dhir and Mr.Vikas Nautiyal, Advs. LPA 534/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through : .... Appellants Mr. Baldev Malik, Adv. versus RAMAN KUMAR ..... Respondent Through : LPA 531/2012 Mr. L.P.Dhir and Mr.Vikas + LPA 540/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : ..... Appellants Mr. Baldev Malik, Adv. versus KAMAL KUMAR L.R. Through : ..... Respondent Mr. L.P.Dhir and Mr.Vikas Nautiyal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 12.03.2013 CM 12463/2012(delay in filing the appeal for 136 days) CM 12469/2012(delay in filing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2013

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-14-2013

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 2659/2012 Date of decision:14. h March, 2013 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Premlata Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. V.P. Gupta & Mr. Anuj Bansal, Advocates along with Mr. Nagesh Behl, Chartered Accountant. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 5443/2012 ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF TAX PRACTITIONERS ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Premlata Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. V.P. Gupta & Mr. Anuj Bansal, Advocates along with Mr. Nagesh Behl, Chartered Accountant. versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Puneet Gupta, Jr Standing Counsel for the Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Whether computerisation and Central Processing of In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2013

Zte Corporation Vs. Siddhant Garg and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-14-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:14.03.2013 + Co. Appeal. No.25/2012 ZTE CORPORATION Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Amit Sibal, Mr. Biswajit Dubey, Mr. T. Mandal, Ms. Gargi Jha & Mr. Ajay Roy, Advs. versus SIDDHANT GARG & ORS. Through: ... Respondents Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vishal Malhotra, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr. Ankur Chibber, Adv. for R-3. Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sumeet Batra & Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advs. for R-4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 08.2.2012 wherein the application filed by him (Company Application No.2103/2011) under order I Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) seeking impleadment in the proceedings pending under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) had been dismissed. 2 Record shows that the company M/s Value A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2013

Gurjit Singh Vs. Registrar (General) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-14-2013

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11821/2009 GURJIT SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Arjun Singh Bawa, Advocate versus REGISTRAR (GENERAL) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal and Mr. Devvrat Singh Raghav, Advocate for respondent no.l Ms. Sana Ansari, proxy counsel for Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate for respondent no.2/GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % 1. ORDER 14 03.2013 The petitioner, before this court, is the son of late Justice Jagjit Singh who presided as a judge of this court between 04.01.1967 and 13.08.1975.2. On 13.03.1990, Justice Jagjit Singh passed away. He was survived by his wife and three children.3. It appears that the wife of late Justice Jagjit Singh fell ill in December, 2005. Consequently, on 07.01.2006, Smt. Bhupinder Kaur was admitted to Inscol Health Centre, situate in Sector-34, Chandigarh. Smt. Bhupinder Kaur, succumbed to her illness, on 27.01.2006.4. The petitioner, on 19.12.2006 preferred an application with th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2013

Union of India and ors Vs. Kamal Kumar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-14-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2013

Union of India and ors. Vs. Raman Kumar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-14-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2013

Vir Pratap Singh Vs. Uoi and anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-14-2013

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 14, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8462/2011 VIR PRATAP SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nayar, Mr.Zeyaul Haque and Mr.S.P.Sethi, Advocates. versus UOI AND ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Amit Dubey, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J (Oral) 1. This writ petition highlights how in the name of compassion the policy of the Government to provide employment to the dependent of the deceased employee to save them from starvation, is being misused. We notice that gesture of the employer towards the dependents in consideration of the services rendered by the deceased employee, has in fact become akin to a right to inherit. We cannot lose sight of the fact that there is throat cut competition to seek public employment, but even after decades of the death of the employee, backdoor entry is being provided to the dependents of the deceased employee wh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2013

M.S.Ginti Vs. Jawahar Lal Nehru University and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-14-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.1582/2001 % March 14, 2013 M.S.GINTI ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.S.C.Dhanda with Ms. Sagari Dhanda, Advs. for R-1/JNU. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-2/UGC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-Sh.M.S.Ginti who was appointed as a Curator by the respondent No.1/Jawahar Lal Nehru University on 21.12.1987. The post of a Curator requires the Curator to grow research crops under academic programme of the University/School of science. Petitioner after completing 8 years of qualifying service was given a senior scale of Rs.3,000-100-5,000/- (pre revised) with effect from 22.12.1995. This was under the Career Advancement Scheme (C.A.S). The petitioner claims that on implementation of the report of the Fifth Pay Commission, the pay sc...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.