Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Jasmine Chawla Sharma and anr. Vs. Dr. Rekha and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:14. 03.2013 Judgment pronounced on :18. 03.2013 LPA 1115/2007 DR. JASMINE CHAWLA SHARMA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr Dinesh Agnani, Senior Adv. with Mr Piyush Sharma and Mr Archit Yadav, Advs. versus DR. REKHA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr S.N. Chodhari, Adv for R-1 And + LPA 1116/2007 MCD ..... Appellant Through: Ms Manjira Dasgupta, Proxy Counsel for Mr Shyel Trehan, Adv for MCD versus DR. REKHA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr S.N. Chodhari, Adv for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. Appellant No. 2 in LPA No. 1115/2007, namely, Dr. Kamla Sharma, was allotted Type V flat not D-1/6, 10, Rajpur Road, Delhi by MCD. Vide allotment letter dated 14.06.2005, the aforesaid flat was allotted to Dr. Rekha, respondent No.1, in LPA No. 1115/2007 on medical grounds. Since Dr. Kamla Sharma was due to retire on 30.04.2007, she applied to MCD for regularization and al...
Furkhan @ Raju Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : February 25, 2013 DECIDED ON : March 18, 2013 + CRL.A. 828/2012 FURKHAN @ RAJU Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Anish Dhingra, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal stands disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.1012/2012 titled as Lala @ Shamim Vs. The State (NCT of Delhi). (S.P.GARG) JUDGE March 18, 2013...
Anjuman-e-haider (Regd.) Vs. Chairman Ndmc, Archna Arora and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :12. 03.2013 Judgment pronounced on :18. 03.2013 CONT. CAS.(C) No.820/2012 ANJUMAN-E-HAIDER (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Tasneem Ahmadi along with Mr. N.R. Thakur, Advs. VERSUS CHAIRMAN NDMC, ARCHNA ARORA AND ORS...... Respondents Through: + Mr. Rohan Tahwani, Adv. for respondent. Mr. Mehmood Pracha along with Ms. Sneha Singh, Advs. for Waqf Board. Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Adv. for NDMC. Mr. Ishwar Singh, SHO, Lodhi Road; SI Sanjiv Mahana, P.S. Lodhi Road. Mr. Pankaj Batra, Adv. for Delhi Police. Mr. Rajiv Bansal along with Mr. Devvrat Singh Raghav and Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Advs. for DDA. W.P.(C) No.646/2012 KARAMVIR SINGH NAGAR AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Vishesh Issar, Adv. VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS...... Respondents Through: Ms. Tasneem Ahmedi, Adv. for R6. Mr. Rohan Tahwani, Adv. for respondent. Mr. Mehmood Pracha along with Ms. Sneha Singh, Advs. for Waqf Board. Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Adv....
Digamber Garments and anr Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 166/2013 DIGAMBER GARMENTS & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Manoj Goel with Mr. Jagmohan Sharma and Mr. Gopal Verma, Advs. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Anusuya Salwan, Ms. Renuka Arora and Mr. Vikas Sood, Advs. for DSIDC Ms. Ferida Satarawala and Ms. Suman Kukrety, Advs. for R-1 And + LPA 167/2013 DIGAMBER GARMENTS & ANR. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Manoj Goel with Mr. Jagmohan Sharma and Mr. Gopal Verma, Advs. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Anusuya Salwan, Ms. Renuka Arora and Mr. Vikas Sood, Advs. for DSIDC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 18.03.2013 CM 4642/2013 & 4645/2012 (exemption) in LPA 166/2013 & CM 4647/2013 & 4651/2012 (exemption) in LPA 167/2013 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. CM 4641/2013 (stay), 4643/2012 (delay of 6 days in filing the appeal), 46...
Kuldeep Tyagi Vs. the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : February 13, 2013 DECIDED ON : March 18 , 2013 + CRL.A.957/2010 & Crl.M.B.No.1971/2012 KULDEEP TYAGI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.K.Singhal with Mr.Siddharth Mittal, Advocates. Versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. SI Rakesh Kumar, PS I.P.Estate. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Kuldeep Tyagi impugns judgment dated 03.04.2010 in Sessions Case No.64/2008 arising out of FIR No.91/2008 registered at Police Station I.P.Estate by which he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine `10,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 12.04.2008 at 02:45 P.M., he and Raj Kumar (since acquitted) kidnapped X (assumed name) aged 17 years from ITO with intent to secretly confine her. It was further alleged that X was wrongfully confined and demand of `15 lacs was made from her fa...
Usha Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:18. 03.2013 + RFA (OS) 31/2011 ..... Appellant USHA Through: Mr. Gajender Giri with Mr. R.L. Kadamb, Advocates. versus PUNJAB & SIND BANK & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav with Mr. Rahul Jain and Ms. Smitakshi Talukdar, Advocates for Resp-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by a judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 13.12.2010 whereby her suit for recovery of ` 65,84,252/- was dismissed on the ground of limitation.2. The appellant - hereafter referred to as plaintiff - was a commission agent carrying on business under the name and style of M/s Universal Exports and in the course of that activity, he used to introduce exporters to buyers and received commission from the sellers. The plaintiff alleged that the second defendant, a manufacturer of cotton yarn, was introduced...
Kapil Kumar Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 03.2013 + W.P.(C) 1729/2013 KAPIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sunil Kumar , Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner seeks a direction that he should be offered appointment to any Central Police Organisations. He had participated in the selection process pursuant to an advertisement dated 30.5.2009, by which applications were invited for competitive examination to fill up vacancies on all India basis to the post of sub-inspectors in Central Police Organisations. The total number of unreserved vacancies were 1091 at the relevant time. The petitioner argues that he secured an aggregate of 304 marks and was clearly entitled to be included in the select list. However, he also highlights the fact that the last cut off marks for ...
United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Guddy and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. No.1120/2011 & CM. No. 22474/2011 Judgment reserved on:22. d February, 2013 Judgment delivered on:18. h March, 2013 % UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate. Versus GUDDY & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.V.K.Ravi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.MAC.APP. No.1120/2011 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award judgment dated 09.09.2011 passed by the learned Tribunal, whereby the appellant/Insurance Company has been held liable to pay compensation in favour of the claimants.2. The grounds agitated in the instant appeal are that the learned MACT has not considered the evidence on record i.e. certified copy of the cover note (R1W1/A) and original insurance proposal (R1W1/B), which clearly show that the original cover note No. 140017 only covered a TVS Suzuki Motor Cycle in the name of insured-Sh.Salim w.e.f. 14.01.2001 to 13.01.2002.3. Brief ...
Debamitra Sinha Vs. Harminder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:18.3.2013 FAO(OS) No.152/2013 DEBAMITRA SINHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Avneesh Garg and Mr.Rahul Chauhan, Advocates. versus HARMINDER SINGH ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.C.M. No.4623/2013 (exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions. FAO(OS) No.152/2013 1 Vide impugned order dated 04.2.2013 the application filed by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) seeking an amendment of his plaint had been allowed. The appellant/defendant is aggrieved by the said order. 2 A suit for recovery of possession, mesne profits had been filed by the plaintiff Harminder Singh against Debamitra Sinha who is stated to be in illegal and unauthorized occupation of the ground floor, mezzanine floor and one garage of the property bearing No.7-A/73-A, Western Extension Area, ...
M. Kundu Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:18. 03.2013 + W.P. (C) 5712/2012 ..... Petitioner SH.M. KUNDU Through: Ms. Rekha Palli with Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner claims directions to the respondents to grant him Assured Career Progression (ACP) scheme benefit in accordance with the prevailing instructions, especially, Circular No.16/2000 dated 18.03.2000. It is contended that the petitioner, who joined the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) on 26.03.1987 as Sub-Inspector, successfully completed 12 years regular service in the same grade without any promotion. He was deputed to the CBI and was, therefore, drawing pay in the higher grade. Upon his repatriation from the CBI on 30.11.2004, he became aware that he had been overlooked fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »