Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Zhuhai Hansen Technology Co Ltd. Vs. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. No. 333 of 2012 Reserved on: March 7, 2013 Decision on: March 19, 2013 ZHUHAI HANSEN TECHNOLOGY CO LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Bansal with Ms. Manisha Singh and Ms. Ritika Nagpal, Advocates. versus SHILPI CABLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Sibal with Mr. Ajay Garg, Mr. Rajeev K. Goel and Mr. Gaurav Dudeja, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 19 03.2013 1. The Petitioner, Zhuhai Hansen Technology Co. Ltd., a company incorporated in Peoples Republic of China having its office in Guangdong, China, has filed this petition under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) seeking the winding up of the Respondent, Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd. Background facts 2. The Petitioner states that it is an acknowledged industry leader in providing antenna-system solutions and service to telecommunication network operators and providing cable operators the last mile connectivity. The Petitio...
Yogesh Radhakrishnan Vs. Media Networks and Distribution (India) Ltd. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h March, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.217/2013 & IA NO.1907/2013 (OF THE PLAINTIFF UNDER ORDER 3 RULE 1 2 CPC) YOGESH RADHAKRISHNAN ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. S. Ganesh & Mr. N.K. Kaul, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Amit Sibal, Vikram Mehta, Mr. Sunil Shekhawat & Mr. Anshuman Srivastava, Advs. Versus MEDIA NETWORKS & DISTRIBUTION (INDIA) LTD. & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jaspreet Singh Kapoor, Adv. for D-1. Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi & Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Kunal Tandon, Adv. for D-2 to 4. Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Malhotra & Mr. Angad Singh Dugal, Advs. for D-5. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The plaintiff, holding 49% shares in the defendant No.1 Company has instituted this suit as a derivative action, for and on behalf of defendant No.1 Company, to prevent the defendant No.2 Bennett Coleman & Company Ltd. holding the remaining 51% ...
Vinod Mehta Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19th March, 2013 + CM(M) 306/2013 VINOD MEHTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Mohit Ramdeo, Advocate. Versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ..... Respondent SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No. 4761/2013 (for early hearing) 1. The above noted petition came up for hearing before this Court on 15.03.2013. Since none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the same was listed for 11.04.2013.2. Vide the instant application, the petitioner is seeking early hearing of the present petition.3. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed.4. Consequently, the date fixed i.e.11.04.2013 stands cancelled.5. The application stands disposed of. + CM(M) 306/2013 1. Vide the instant petition, petitioner is seeking relief as under: A. B. Stay proceedings in the execution petition bearing no. 15/09 styled as Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mahender Ram Sewak & A...
Shri S.M. Dongarwar Vs. Pec Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) Nos.7615/2008 & 540/2012 % 1. March 19, 2013 W.P.(C) NO.7615/2008 SHRI S.M. DONGARWAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Avneesh Garg, Advocate. versus PEC LIMITED Through:2. ..... Respondent Mr. Baankey Bihari Sharma, Advocate. W.P.(C) NO.540/2012 SHRI S.M. DONGARWAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Avneesh Garg, Advocate. versus PEC LIMITED Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Baankey Bihari Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) + W.P.(C) No.7615/2008 1. This writ petition has become infructuous inasmuch as this writ petition sought quashing of the chargesheet dated 14.7.2006 and the departmental proceedings ensued on that basis, inasmuch as the respondent-corporation has already withdrawn the chargesheet and proceedings on that basis.2. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. + W.P.(C) No.540/2012 3. By this writ petition, the petitioner who was an employ...
Fmi Limited Vs. Mr. Ashok JaIn and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 189/2005 Date of Decision:19. 03.2013 FMI LIMITED ....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sushant Singh, Mr. Tejinder Singh, Mr. P.C. Arya & Mr. V.K. Shukla, Advs. Versus ...Defendants MR. ASHOK JAIN & ORS Through: Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. This is a suit seeking permanent injunction against infringement of trademark and passing off. The plaintiff has also prayed for damages and delivery up of all infringing articles qua the plaintiffs trademark FREEMANS, adopted for measuring tapes and part components thereof. The brief facts of the case are as under.2. The plaintiff is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and carries on the business of manufacturing and/or marketing and exporting measuring tapes and part components thereof. The trademark FREEMANS was registered under No. 215880 on 06.12.1963, in respect of tape measures under class 9 and the same trademark were registered...
Dcm Limited Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. 02.2013 Decided on:19. 03.2013 + RFA (OS) 104/2012 & C.M. NO.18873/2012 DCM LIMITED ..... Appellant Through : Sh. Sanjeev Anand, Sh. Abhas Kumar and Ms. Anubha Surana, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. In the present appeal, the judgment and order of 19.09.2012, dismissing CS 1085/1991, has been impugned.2. The plaintiff which has filed the present appeal (and is hereafter referred to as DCM or the plaintiff variously), claimed a declaration and decree for permanent injunction in respect of land situated at Baghraoji, Delhi. The DCM contended that some of its other lands were taken-over by the Delhi Improvement Trust as it was required for realignment of drain known as Daryai Nala and in exchange it was ...
S.K.Bahadur Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 06, 2013 Pronounced on: March 19, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 3897/2011, Crl.M.A.Nos. 18362/2011, 31/2012 & 13165/2012 S K BAHADUR ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate CRL.M.C. 4060/2011 ASHA BHATNAGAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K.Bahadur (husband of petitioner) versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT 1 In the above captioned first petition, challenge is to impugned order of 8th September, 2011 (Annexure P-2) declining alteration of charge in a disproportionate assets case against petitioner- S. K. Bahadur, whereas in the above captioned second petition, his wife is seeking release of her seized cash, jewellery, etc. i.e. items in Group II and III as detailed in paragraph No.9 of Judgment d...
M.R. Bhardwaj and anr. Vs. Delhi State Coop. Bank Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No.4163/1992 & WP(C) No.396/1993 % March 19, 2013 WP(C) No.4163/1992 M.R. BHARDWAJ & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sunil Malhotra with Mr. Suraj Agarwal, Advs. versus DELHI STATE COOP. BANK LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anand Yadav, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Ishita Chakraborti, Adv. for Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Adv. for R-2. and WP(C) No.396/1993 UMED SINGH DAHIYA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Malhotra with Mr. Suraj Agarwal, Advs. versus DELHI STATE COOP. BANK LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anand Yadav, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Ishita Chakraborti, Adv. for Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) WP(C) No.4163/1992 1. This writ petition is filed by two petitioners. Petitioner No.1 is Mr. M.R.Bhardwaj and petitioner No.2 is Mrs. Kanak Rastogi. The case as put forth in the writ petition is that the petitioners hav...
ishtiyaque Ahmad Vs. Vice Chancellor, Jamia Hamdaard University and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.1815/2013 % March 19, 2013 ISHTIYAQUE AHMAD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A. Hassan & Mr. Abrar Ahmad, Advs. versus VICE CHANCELLOR, JAMIA HAMDAARD UNIVERSITY AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.K.Rao, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ekta K. Sikri, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-Professor Ishtiyaque Ahmad seeking three reliefs. First is challenge to the order dated 4.2.2013, and which order upheld the action of the Vice-Chancellor in removing the petitioner from the post of Head of Department of Islamic Studies and Social Sciences. The second relief claimed in the writ petition is challenge to the show-cause notice dated 25.2.2013 initiating departmental proceedings against the petitioner. The third relief is really a consequential relief on the petitioner being continued in the post of Head of Department, however...
Maj Saurabh Saharan Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. 03.2013 + WP(C) No.1755/2013 & CM No. 3355/2013 MAJ SAURABH SAHARAN ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Manglik, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ravinder Aggarwal & Mr. Amit Yadav, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. Notice. Mr.Ravinder Aggarwal accepts notice. With the consent of the counsel for the parties the petition is heard finally for disposal.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) whereby his application under Section 15(3) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 being OA No.80/2013 was dismissed. WP(C) No. 1755/2013 Pag3. Briefly, the facts are that the petitioner was serving as a Major in the Army and was commissioned in 2000. Whilst he was posted to 61 Cavalry which was primarily associated with Polo, he was in touch with ...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »