Delhi Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madhu Arora Alias Hony Monga Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 343/2012 MADHU ARORA ALIAS HONY MONGA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nanda Kinra, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate. % Date of Decision : February 26, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. Rule.2. With the consent of the parties, the Writ Petition was taken up for final hearing and disposal.3. The facts leading to the filing of the present Writ Petition are that the Petitioner had booked an LIG flat in the year 1979 vide registration No.61175 in the New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979 (for short NPRS Scheme). From the year 1996 onwards, the Petitioner made several representations to the Delhi Development Authority to know the status of the allotment and attended several public hearings. Eventually, the Petitioner was informed that the record/file relating to her case were missing from 1996 and could not be traced out. On 13.11.2...
Ganga Sharan @ Chotu and anr. Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h February, 2013 DECIDED ON :26. h February, 2013 + CRL.A.464/2001 GANGA SHARAN @ CHOTU & ANR. ....Appellants Through : Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : .Respondent Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellants- Ganga Sharan @ Chotu (A-1) and Surender Kumar (A-2) impugn judgment dated 16.05.2001 and order on sentence dated 26.05.2001 in Sessions Case No.152/2000 arising out of FIR No. 37/2000 PS Kapashera by which A-1 was held guilty under Section 506 IPC and sentenced to period already undergone by him and A-2 was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 376/506 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine ` 4,000/-.2. The present case was registered on 18.02.2000 on the statement (Ex.PW-1/A) of the prosecutrix X (assumed name). She disclosed that on 05.01.2000 when she was alone in the house, at ...
Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. Abul Kalam Azad Islamic Awakeni ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 02.2013 ITA 80/2013 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) ... Appellant versus ABUL KALAM AZAD ISLAMIC AWAKENING ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Karan Khanna, Ms Asmita Kumar : None CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal by the revenue is directed against the order dated 30.03.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA 386/Del/2012 pertaining to the cancellation of registration under Section 12AA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The respondent assessee had filed an appeal before the Tribunal being aggrieved by the order of the Director of Income Tax (E) passed under Section 12AA(3) read with Section 12 of the Income Tax Act cancelling the registration granted to the assessee under Section 12(A).2. The entire case of the reve...
Cit Vs. Technovate E Solutions Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
$~10 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 02.2013 ITA 100/2012 CIT ..... Appellant versus TECHNOVATE E SOLUTIONS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rohit Madan, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr Salil Kapoor and Mr Vikas Jain, Advs. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The revenue is aggrieved by the order dated 20.06.2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA 135/Del/2011 in respect of the assessment year 2003-04. The revenue has proposed the following questions as substantial questions of law: (A) Whether the Tribunal erred in law in coming to the conclusion that the approval granted by the Director of STPI was sufficient approval so as to satisfy the conditions relating to approvals under section 10A of the Act? (B) Whether the Tribunal erred in law in concluding that the software expenses incurred by the assessee was re...
Puneet Chawla Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:26. h February, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2534/2011 PUNEET CHAWLA Through: .. Petitioner Mr. Prag Chawla, Adv. with Mr. K.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Saurav, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The Petitioner invokes inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the Code) for quashing of FIR No.518/2007 dated 28.11.2007, registered at Police Station (PS) Janakpuri and the report under Section 173 of the Code filed on the basis of the said FIR.2. The short ground taken by the Petitioner is that the allegations made by the complainant in the charge sheet would show that the alleged acts of cruelty/misappropriation took place either at Faridabad or at Chandigarh. Relying on Sections 177 and 178 of the Code, the learned counsel for the Petitioner urges that since ne...
Rajdhani Park Kalyan Karini Samiti and ors. Vs. the Financial Commissi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
$~R-2, 3 and 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on : February 21, 2013 Judgment pronounced on : February 26, 2013 LPA No. 1154/2007 RAJDHANI PARK KALYAN KARINI SAMITI & ORS. ..... Appellant Versus THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS. ..... Respondent + LPA No.1183/2007 CHARANJIT SINGH BHALIA AND ANR. ..... Appellant Versus THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS. ..... Respondent + LPA No.1245/2007 PRAKASH LAND AND HOUSING CORPORATION versus FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS. LPA 1154/07,1183/07 &1245/07 ..... Appellant Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. Ankit Jain and Mr. Ajay Mohan Gulati, Advs. in LPA No.1154/2007. Mr. Rajendra Dutt, Adv. in LPA No.1183/2007. Mr. Kamal Mehta, Adv. in LPA No.1245/2007. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr Adv with Mr Sheetesh, Adv for respondent No.4 Ms. Avnish Ahlawat with Mr. N.K. Singh and Mr. Vibhav Mishra, Advs. for R-1 to 3. Mr. Davinder Verma, Adv. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V...
Ashok Kumar Vs. Sheel Kumar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h December, 2012 Pronounced on:26. h February, 2013 + MAC.APP. 314/2006 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Peeush Sharma, Advocate versus SHEEL KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Rohit Gandhi, Advocate for the Respondents No.1,2 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The Appellant Ashok Kumar impugns a judgment dated 18.01.2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) whereby while awarding a compensation of `1,22,400/- along with interest @ 6% per annum, the Claims Tribunal exonerated the United India Insurance Co. Ltd., the insurer of the vehicle, on the ground that the policy commenced on 03.10.1997 at 8:30 pm whereas the accident occurred on 03.10.1997 at 5.30 pm.2. There is twin challenge to the award. First, on the quantum of compensation and, second on the liability.3. The finding on negligence reached by the Claims Tribunal is not challenged by any of th...
Vijay Singh @ Darona Vs. the State of N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
$-24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :26. h February, 2013 + CRL.A.368/2001 VIJAY SINGH @ DARONA ....Appellant Through : Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI ....Respondent Through : Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. SI Dayanand Yadav, PS Sultanpuri. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Vijay Singh @ Darona has filed the present appeal against the judgment and order on sentence dated 22.01.2001 in Sessions Case No.177/1996 arising out of FIR No.435/1992 PS Sultanpuri by which he and his associates Siri Kishana @ Krishan and Tara Devi were held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 368/376 IPC. He was sentenced to undergo RI for five years under Section 368/34 IPC and RI for seven years with fine ` 250/- under Section 376 IPC.2. Allegations against the accused were that on 10.09.1992, co- accused Hira Lal kidnapped prosecutrix X (assumed name), aged 12 years. The police came into motion when D...
islam Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 26, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1257/2013 ISLAM ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Shailender Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Employed as a Driver with DTC in the year 1979 and subjected to medical fitness as per the fitness norms notified on April 08, 1976 the petitioner had a right to serve DTC till he attained the age of 55 years and thereafter had a right to be considered for further retention till he attained the age of 60 years but upon being found medically fit.3. It is not in dispute that in the year 1986 revised medical fitness norms were notified by DTC on July 02, 1986, making substantial departure from the previous Standard of Physical Fitness notified on April 08, 1976....
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Anita and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:26. h February, 2013 + MAC.APP. 180/2010 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocate versus ANITA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: + Mr.O.P.Mannie, Advocate MAC.APP. 181/2010 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocate versus BABITA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: + Mr.O.P.Mannie, Advocate MAC.APP. 193/2010 BABITA & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr.O.P.Mannie, Advocate versus SURENDER & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocate for the Respondent No.3 Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. These three Appeals arise out of a judgment dated 05.12.2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) whereby two Claim Petitions, that is, MAC Suit No.176/2005 titled Babita & Ors. v. Surender & Ors., and MAC Suit No.183/2005 titled Anita v. Sure...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »