Delhi Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Rajguru Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A): 1. The applicant, Shri S. Rajguru, a retired Indian Revenue Service (Income Tax) Officer of 1978 batch, is aggrieved by the Memorandum dated 26.04.2012 (Annexure A-1) by which it has been proposed to hold an enquiry under Rule 14 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 and, therefore, has sought the following relief(s):- (a) Quash the Memorandum (F.No. C-14011/24/2012-28L) dated 26th April, 2012, initiating Disciplinary proceedings against the Applicant. Direct the Respondents to release the pensionary benefits such as commutation of pension, leave encashment, gratuity of the Applicant forthwith with interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of retirement till payment. Any other or further orders as this Honble Tribunal may deem fit and proper. 2. In order to consider the above prayers, the relevant facts are provided here. While the applicant was working as Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) [CIT(A) in brief) at Cochin during November 2005 to February, 2007, he rec...
Sub (Now Nb Sub) (Gd) Rajbir Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
1. The petitioner vide this petition has prayed to quash the orders dated 13.09.2010 by which the petitioner has been ordered to be discharged from service as well as order dated 24.12.2010 by which the promotion of the petitioner has been cancelled alongwith order dated 27.12.2010 issued by respondent No.3 calling upon the petitioner to retire from service with effect from 31.01.2011 with further directions to allow the petitioner to serve in his promoted rank as per the existing instructions of the respondents by granting him such promotion with effect from 01.12.2009. The petitioner has also prayed to quash the policy instructions of the respondents issued vide letter dated 20.09.2008 which permits the respondents to cancel the enhancement of service on the ground of placement of a person in low medical category and issuance of discharge order in this respect without show cause notice and without obtaining the opinion of the invaliding medical board. 2. The petitioner was enrolled i...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›