Delhi Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Qumarul Hasan and anr Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. h February, 2013 CM (M) 196/2013 QUMARUL HASAN & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Firoz Alam, Adv. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: NEMO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant petition has been filed against the order dated 09.01.2013, whereby, ld. Tribunal has rejected his application u/s 151 CPC for releasing the amount which has been directed to keep in FDR vide award dated 16.07.2011.2. It is stated in the instant petition that petitioners are residing at C-160/3, Shahin Bagh, Thokar No. 8, Abul Fazal Enclave, Jamia Nagar, New Delhi 110025 for the last two years as a tenant of Mohammad Ahsaan and paying a rent of Rs.4,000/- per month.3. Petitioner no. 1 is a qualified Mufti, surviving on an amount received on imparting knowledge of religious scriptures to the students through private tuitions, whereas, petitioner no. 2 is a housewife.4. Petitioner No.1 has save...
Airports Authority of India Vs. Daya Chand and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
$~R1-~R6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 31st, 2013 Pronounced on: February 19th, 2013 % + LPA 429/2007 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Digvijay Rai, Adv. Versus NIRMALA DEVI & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms. Shruti Verma, Advocates. Mr Rajiv Bansal and Mr Rahul Bhandari, Advs. for DDA Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for Nodal Officer Mr Milanka Chaudhury and Mr Abhishek Sharma, Advs. for DIAL Mr. Dipesh Chaudhary and Mr. Kunwar Udai Bhan, Advocates And + LPA 431/2007 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr Digvijay Rai, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus DAYA NAND & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Adv with Mr Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms Shruti Verma, Advs for respondent No.1 Mr Rajiv Bansal and Mr Rahul Bhandari, Advs. for DDA Mr Milanka Chaudhury and Mr Abhishek Sharma, Advs. for DIAL Mr. Sanjay K. Pathak, Advocate for LAC/Nodal Officer And + LPA 432/2007 AI...
Seema Nayyar Vs. M.C.D. and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 1163/2007 SEEMA NAYYAR ..... Appellant Versus M.C.D. & ORS. .... Respondents AND + LPA 1164/2007 RAGHU NAYYAR ..... Appellant Versus M.C.D. & ORS. .... Respondents AND + LPA 1171/2007 & CM No. 15074/2007 M.C.D. ..... Appellant Versus RAGHU NAYYAR .... Respondent AND + LPA 1172/2007 & CM Nos. 11684/2007 & 10053/2008 M.C.D. ..... Appellant Versus SEEMA NAYYAR .... Respondent Present: The appellant Raghu Nayyar in person and for Mrs Seema Nayyar Ms Amita Gupta, Adv for MCD Ms Avnish Ahlawat for GNCT Mr B.B. Jain for respondent No. 2 in LPA No.1163/2007 and 1164/2007 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 19.02.2013 The appellant in LPA No.1164/2007 Shri Raghu Nayyar entered into an agreement dated 22.08.1997 to purchase Flat No. A-45, Retreat Cooperative Group Housing Society Complex, constructed on Plat No. 20, I.P. Extension, New Delhi for a consideration of Rs 7,90,000/-. The appellant in LPA 1163/2007 S...
State Through Cbi Vs. Mohd.Umar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :14. h January, 2013 DECIDED ON :19. h February, 2013 + CRL.A. 616/1999 STATE THROUGH CBI ....Appellant Through : Mr.R.V.Sinha, Standing Counsel. versus MOHD.UMAR Through : .Respondent Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr. Advocate with Mr.M.Shamikh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. State (through CBI) has preferred the present appeal against the judgment dated 05.09.1998 of learned Special Judge, Delhi by which the conviction and sentence recorded by learned Metropolitan Magistrate in R/C No.10 (S)/94 PS SIC-I/SIU-II/CBI, Delhi was set aside and the respondent was acquitted.2. The respondent Mohd. Umar was arrested by CBI for committing offences punishable under Sections 420/468/471 IPC. Allegations against the respondent were that in September, 1992, he cheated Udayvir Singh and Dalmia Industries by forging recommendatory CRL.A. 616/1999 Page 1 of 7 letter dated 09.09.1992 addressed to M/s. Dalmia Industries, Bharatpur, R...
Pratap Singh Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 87/2013 & CM 2732/2013 PRATAP SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 19.02.2013 The appellant claims to have been appointed by the respondent with effect from 25.1.1986 and rendered services till 20.3.1987. Alleging that he was not allowed to work with effect from 3.4.1987, the appellant raised an industrial disputes, which was referred to the Labour Court for adjudication. The respondent refuted the claim of the appellant before the Labour Court by filing a written statement claiming that no appointment order was available in its record. It was further alleged in the written statement that the appellant had obtained bogus order of posting/ transfer as Chowkidar, in connivance with some person and had also obtained salary for the aforesaid period without having b...
Chander Shekhar Manchanda Vs. Aarti Manchanda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) NO.646 OF 201.Decided on :19. h February, 2013 CHANDER SHEKHAR MANCHANDA Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate. Versus AARTI MANCHANDA Through: Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 19.4.2011 passed by the Family Court, Rohini by virtue of which the interim maintenance @ `15,000/was granted to the respondent/wife.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. He has stated that the documents filed by him have not been considered. In this regard, the learned counsel has drawn the attention of the Court to pages 28-29 of the petition showing identity card of the respondent/wife and a receipt purported to be showing that she had deposited a sum of `6,000/- with some institute for taking some computer training.3. It has also been contended by the learned counsel that the respondent has a flat in Rohini and sh...
Bsnl and anr Vs. Manish Samadhiya and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : February 14, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : February 18, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6563/2012 BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD AND ANR ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.K.K.Rai, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rajnish Prasad, Advocate. versus NEERAJ JAIN AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Amit Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Sabin Rana, Advocate. AND W.P.(C) 6665/2012 B.S.N.L. AND ANR ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.K.K.Rai, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rajnish Prasad, Advocate versus AKENDRA KUMARI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Amit Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Sabin Rana, Advocate. AND W.P.(C) 7094/2012 BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD AND ANR ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.K.K.Rai, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rajnish Prasad, Advocate versus PRADEEP KUMAR AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Amit Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Sabin Rana, Advocate. AND W.P.(C) 7095/2012 BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD AND ANR ..... Petitioners Represe...
Anil Singh Vs. Aarti Rani @ Seema
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : February 11, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : February 18, 2013 + MAT.APP. 72/2011 ANIL SINGH ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Jai Bansal, Advocate. versus AARTI RANI @ SEEMA .... Respondent Represented by: Mr.D.K.Santoshi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. March 08, 2007 was the date when appellant and respondent got married. March 2008 is the date alleged by the appellant when respondent returned to her parental house. June 2008 is the date when as per the appellant the respondent returned to her matrimonial house. July 03, 2008 is the date when as per the appellant the respondent returned to her parental house. Complaints and counter complaints were made immediately thereafter. August 23, 2009 is the date alleged by the appellant when the respondent once again left her matrimonial house compelling the appellant to seek restitution of conjug...
Mr. Sulabh Puri and anr. Vs. Mr. Sudhir Puri and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 231/2013 & I.As. 1958-1961/2013 MR. SULABH PURI & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Ashish Mohan and Mr. Chetan Rai Wahi, Advocates versus MR. SUDHIR PURI & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants None Reserved on:6. h February, 2013. Date of Decision:18th February, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J 1.Present suit for partition has been filed by the children of Defendant no. 1 seeking partition of property bearing No. I-35, Jangpura Extension, New Delhi admeasuring 200 sq. yd., which is a three storied house and which was initially allotted to the great grandfather of the plaintiffs in lieu of ancestral property left behind by him in Pakistan.2. It is stated in the plaint that plaintiffs are estranged from their father, namely, defendant no. 1 herein and it is only on 26 th May, 2012 that they came to know about pendency of a suit for partition between their father and his brother as well as sister, namely, de...
Sh. Brahm Dutt Sharma Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 986/2013 & conn.1. 18th February, 2013 W.P.(C) No. 986/2013 SH. BRAHM DUTT SHARMA Through: ...... Petitioner Vimal Wadhawan, Adv. VERSUS BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Shawana Bari, Adv. for Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. for R-2.2. W.P.(C) No. 1015/2013 K.L.SHARMA Through: ...... Petitioner Vimal Wadhawan, Adv. VERSUS NDPL & ANR . ...... Respondents Thro9ugh: Mr. Abhay Kumar and Mr. U.P.Singh, Adv. for R-1. Mr. V.C.Jha, and Ms. Sonia Sharma, Adv. for R-2.3. W.P.(C) No. 1020/2013 DEEPAK MOHAN SETHI Through: W.P(C) 986/2013 & conn. matters ...... Petitioner VERSUS BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Shawana Bari, Adv. for Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. for R-2.4. W.P.(C) No. 1036/2013 S.P.CHAWLA Through: ...... Petitioner Vimal Wadhawan, Adv. VERSUS BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Shawana Bari, Adv. for Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUST...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »