Delhi Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Airports Authority of India Vs. Ballu Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
$~R1-~R6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 31st, 2013 Pronounced on: February 19th, 2013 % + LPA 429/2007 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Digvijay Rai, Adv. Versus NIRMALA DEVI & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms. Shruti Verma, Advocates. Mr Rajiv Bansal and Mr Rahul Bhandari, Advs. for DDA Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for Nodal Officer Mr Milanka Chaudhury and Mr Abhishek Sharma, Advs. for DIAL Mr. Dipesh Chaudhary and Mr. Kunwar Udai Bhan, Advocates And + LPA 431/2007 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr Digvijay Rai, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus DAYA NAND & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Adv with Mr Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms Shruti Verma, Advs for respondent No.1 Mr Rajiv Bansal and Mr Rahul Bhandari, Advs. for DDA Mr Milanka Chaudhury and Mr Abhishek Sharma, Advs. for DIAL Mr. Sanjay K. Pathak, Advocate for LAC/Nodal Officer And + LPA 432/2007 AI...
Const Hanmant Dahiphale and anr Vs. Smt Alka JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d November, 2012 Pronounced on:19. h February, 2013 + MAC.APP. 629/2011 CONST HANMANT DAHIPHALE & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shaqib, Adv. with Mr. Bhupender Sharma, Adv. versus SMT ALKA JAIN & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The Appellants who are the driver and owner of the truck No. AS-01-V3707 impugn a judgment dated 26.03.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of `46,44,484/- was awarded in favour of the Respondents on the ground that there was no negligence on the part of Appellant No.1 in causing the accident and that the compensation awarded is exorbitant and excessive. NEGLIGENCE 2 It is urged by learned counsel for the Appellants that there was no negligence on the part of Appellant No.1 in driving the earlier said truck. In fact, the rickshaw puller (Chhotey Lal) wa...
Rishi Raj and anr Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:19. h February, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2012/2011 .. Petitioners RISHI RAJ & ANR Through: Mr. Vikas Arora & Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. By virtue of this Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure(the Code), the Petitioners challenge an order dated 02.06.2011 passed by the learned A.C.M.M. whereby the police was directed to conduct further investigation expeditiously and promptly. The order dated 02.06.2011 is extracted hereunder:02. 06.2011 Present: SI Bhushan Azad in person Accused Shiv Narain, Raj Kumar & Kewal Singh alongwith counsel. Counsel for the accused B.Subhash Further status report regarding the accused persons namely B.Subhash, Muni Raj, Rish Raj and Girdhari Lal is filed. The IO is not able to show the case diary written by him sinc...
Airports Authority of India Vs. Sarup Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
$~R1-~R6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 31st, 2013 Pronounced on: February 19th, 2013 % + LPA 429/2007 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Digvijay Rai, Adv. Versus NIRMALA DEVI & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms. Shruti Verma, Advocates. Mr Rajiv Bansal and Mr Rahul Bhandari, Advs. for DDA Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for Nodal Officer Mr Milanka Chaudhury and Mr Abhishek Sharma, Advs. for DIAL Mr. Dipesh Chaudhary and Mr. Kunwar Udai Bhan, Advocates And + LPA 431/2007 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr Digvijay Rai, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus DAYA NAND & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Adv with Mr Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms Shruti Verma, Advs for respondent No.1 Mr Rajiv Bansal and Mr Rahul Bhandari, Advs. for DDA Mr Milanka Chaudhury and Mr Abhishek Sharma, Advs. for DIAL Mr. Sanjay K. Pathak, Advocate for LAC/Nodal Officer And + LPA 432/2007 AI...
Mool Chand Khairati Ram Hospital and Ayurvedic Resea Vs. George Xavier ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :08. 02.2013 Judgment pronounced on :19. 02.2013 LPA No.606/2012 MOOL CHAND KHAIRATI RAM HOSPITAL & AYURVEDIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. Versus GEORGE XAVIER & ANR. .... Respondents Through : Mr. N.D. Panchal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The respondent before this Court was appointed as Lab Assistant with the appellant on 9.4.1983 and was promoted as Lab Technician with effect from 9.1.1985. Vide order dated 5.12.1985, the services of the respondent were terminated. Being aggrieved, the respondent raised an industrial disputes in this regard and the Labour Court, vide an award dated 26.5.1994, directed reinstatement of the respondent in service with continuity of service. W.P(C) No.2217/2000 was filed by the appellant, impuging the aforesaid award. Vide an interim order dated 22.1.2000, the learned Single Judge stayed the aw...
Airports Authority of India Vs. Ranbir Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
$~R1-~R6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 31st, 2013 Pronounced on: February 19th, 2013 % + LPA 429/2007 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Digvijay Rai, Adv. Versus NIRMALA DEVI & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms. Shruti Verma, Advocates. Mr Rajiv Bansal and Mr Rahul Bhandari, Advs. for DDA Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for Nodal Officer Mr Milanka Chaudhury and Mr Abhishek Sharma, Advs. for DIAL Mr. Dipesh Chaudhary and Mr. Kunwar Udai Bhan, Advocates And + LPA 431/2007 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr Digvijay Rai, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus DAYA NAND & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Adv with Mr Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms Shruti Verma, Advs for respondent No.1 Mr Rajiv Bansal and Mr Rahul Bhandari, Advs. for DDA Mr Milanka Chaudhury and Mr Abhishek Sharma, Advs. for DIAL Mr. Sanjay K. Pathak, Advocate for LAC/Nodal Officer And + LPA 432/2007 AI...
Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.8763/2011 % Date of decision:19. h February, 2013 RAVINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Col.R.S. Kalkal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.Sachin Datta, CGSC with Mr.Dinesh Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. By way of the instant petition, the petitioner assails an order dated 1 st September, 2011 whereby his OA No.522/2010 seeking grant of disability pension under the provisions of Regulation 173A of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 was rejected by the Armed Forces Tribunal.2. The undisputed fact giving rise to the present petition to the extent necessary and briefly noticed hereafter. The petitioner has contended that he was enrolled into the Indian Army on 1st October, 1990 and was thereafter discharged on the 31st January, 2001 on the ground that he was awarded four red ink entries in his service record on account...
Apex Tannery Ltd Vs. Crew B.O.S. Products Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: February 19, 2013 + OMP No.1078/2012 APEX TANNERY LTD Through ..... Petitioner Mr.N.K.Kaul, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Manu Seshadri & Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advs. versus CREW B.O.S PRODUCTS LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Samir Malik, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the abovementioned petition under the provisions of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the following reliefs:(a) direct the respondent to furnish security to the extent of USD 1,683,293.76 (equivalent to Rs.9,25,81,115.00) failing which order attachment of the immovable properties more fully described in AnnexureP10 and attachment of the bank accounts more fully described in Annexure-P11 pending disposal of the proceedings; (b) in the alternative restrain the respondent from alienating or disposing of its immovable properties listed in Annexure-P10 and withdrawing or utilizing an ...
Cargill India P.Ltd. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h February, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2259/2007 CARGILL INDIA P.LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajesh Batra, Adv. with Mr. Jitendra Anand, Adv. versus STATE & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of Complaint Case No. SWMEA/ SA/PCR /GENI/ NORTH ZONE/ TLM 59/393-396 (registered as Criminal Case No.1111/2007) filed by Respondent No.3 prosecuting the Petitioner under Section 33 read with Section 51 of the Standards of Weights & Measures Act, 1976 (the Act of 1976).2. On 15.06.2006, Respondent No.3 (Inspector, Weights & Measures) inspected the premises of M/s. Mangal Sain & Sons, 321/1 Main Subzi Mandi, Delhi. On conclusion of the said inspection, the Respondent no.3 made a detailed inspection report which is extracted hereunder: Checked the packages of Nature Fresh Acti Lite refined vegetable oil conta...
Vidhu Seth Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :19. h February, 2013 % + CRL.REV.P.446/2011 VIDHU SETHI Through : ..... Petitioner Ms.Sanjana J.Bali, Mr.Saurabh Seth and Ms.Shweta Kapoor, Advs. versus STATE AND ANR. Through : ..... Respondents None for R-1. Mr.Mudit Jain and Mr.Hemant Chauhan, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) Crl.Rev.P. 446/2011 & Crl.M.A. No.1811/2011 (Stay) 1. The petitioner is facing trial in a case filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. She has filed this Criminal Revision Petition feeling aggrieved by the order dated 03.09.2011 passed by learned Addl.Session Judge, Incharge South-West District, Dwarka, Delhi whereby he allowed the revision petition filed by the complainant thereby permitting the complainant to confront the petitioner/accused with statement of account, during her cross examination.2. This is the second revision petition filed in respect of the order as to whether petit...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »