Delhi Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bindu Natrajan Vs. Avi Oil India P Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.1196/2011 % February 20, 2013 BINDU NATRAJAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Parivesh Singh with Mr. R.Satish Kumar, Advs. versus AVI OIL INDIA P LTD Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Vikas Goel with Ms. Neha Goyal, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner who was an employee of the respondent-company, and whose services were terminated in terms of the appointment letter by giving three months salary.2. The issue in the present case is whether the writ petition is maintainable more so when the contractual condition of the petitioner having received three months salary was complied with.3. Learned counsel for the respondent relies upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of P.B.Ghayalod vs. M/s. Maruti Udyog Ltd., AIR 199.Delhi 145 in which the ratio which is laid down is that merely because the Government...
Ashok Chawla Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. M.C. No. 3548/2011 Date of Decision:20. h February, 2013 + # ! ASHOK CHAWLA ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Bassi, Advocate Versus $ STATE & ANR. .Respondents Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State with Inspector Brijesh Kumar, P.S. Karol Bagh & Crl. M.C. No. 1510/2012 # ! ASHOK CHAWLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Bassi, Advocate Versus $ * STATE & ANR. .Respondents Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K. BHASIN, J: The petitioner in Crl. M.C.No. 3548/2011 has sought quashing of the order dated 10th October,2011 passed by Shri Ajay Garg, Metropolitan Magistrate(Tis Hazari) in complaint case no. 403/1/10 filed against him and many others by one Smt. Sushila Suryawanshi (respondent no.2 in this petition), whereby registration of an FIR was ordered under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973(Cr.P.C. in short) while in Crl. M.C. No. 1510 of 2010 the same petition...
Lavneet Kaur Bhatia Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :18. 02.2013 Judgment pronounced on :20. 02.2013 LPA 720/2012 LAVNEET KAUR BHATIA Through ..... Appellant Mr. N. Kinra, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through Mr. Pawan Mathur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. Sh. Raghubir Singh, husband of the appellant got himself registered with the respondent-DDA for allotment of an MIG flat. At the time of registration, Sh. Raghubir Singh gave his address as A-241, Krishna Nagar, Delhi. Sh. Raghubir Singh expired on 3rd January, 1989 and the case of the appellant is that vide letter dated 25th January, 1989, informed the respondent about his death and sought transfer of the said registration in her name. In a draw of lots held in the year 1999, a flat was allotted in the name of late Sh. Raghubir Singh and the allotment letter was sent at the address given in the registration form. On DDA publishin...
Slum and Jj Department, Mcd Vs. NaraIn Dass
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. NO.42 OF 201.& CM 4579/2012 Decided on :20. h February, 2013 SLUM & JJ DEPARTMENT, MCD Appellant Through: Counsel (presence not given) Versus NARAIN DASS Through: Respondent Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) CM 4580/12 (delay of 250 in filing) CM 4581/2012 (delay of 230 days in re-filing) 1. This order shall dispose of an application bearing CM no.4580/12 u/S 5 of the limitation Act seeking condonation of 250 days delay in filing the present appeal and an application bearing CM no.4581/2012, under Section 151 CPC seeking condonation of 230 days delay in re-filling the appeal.2. At the outset, it may be contended that Rule 5 of Chapter I Part A(a), Delhi High Court Rules lays down that once an appeal is under objection, the objections are to be removed within a week and if the objections are not removed within a week and thirty days in aggregate, then the delay in re-filing of the appeal sha...
Dinesh Kumar Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2013
$~32 & 33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :20. h February, 2013 % + CRL.REV.P. 252/2012 DINESH KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR Through : ..... Respondents None for State/R-1. Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel for MCD/R-2 with Mr.K.K.Gupta, Health Officer. AND + CRL.REV.P. 259/2012 DINESH KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR Through : ..... Respondents None for State/R-1. Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel for MCD/R-2 with Mr.K.K.Gupta, Health Officer. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) Crl.Rev.P. 252/2012 & Crl.M.A. No.5577/2012 Crl.Rev.P. 259/2012 & Crl.M.A. Nos.5822 & 5824 o1. Vide this order, I shall dispose of the two criminal revision petitions bearing Nos.252/2012 and 259/2012 as in both the cases the petitioner has been convicted for being found running Vinayak Restaurant at House No.1450, East Jyoti Nagar, Loni Road, Shahdara, Delhi-...
Social Jurist, a Civit Rights Group Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:13. 02.2013 Judgment pronounced on:19. 02.2013 % + W.P.(C) NO.8533/2010 SOCIAL JURIST, A CIVIT RIGHTS GROUP ...Petitioner Through : Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Mr.Vikas K. Chadha, Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Ms.Nisha Tomar, Ms. Kusum Sharma, Advocates VERSUS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Anjum Javed, Mohd. Noorullah, Mr. Mirza Amir Baig, Advs. for GNCTD Mr. Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aditya Garg, Mr. Rohit S., Advs. for intervener Forum for Promotion of Quality Education for All Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Ms. Vanessa Singh, Advs. for R2/UOI Mr. Neeraj K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr.P.D. Gupta, Mr.Kamal Gupta, Adv. for schools Ms. Shobha, Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advs. for the Action Committee + W.P.(C) NO.263/2011 DELHI COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS ...Petitioner Through : Mr. R. Venkataramani Sr. Adv. with Mr.A.K. Singh, Ms.Neelam Singh, Ms.Supriya Garg, Advocates VERS...
Mohinder Kaur Bajaj and ors. Vs. Dda and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2791/2011 MOHINDER KAUR BAJAJ & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Satinder S.Gulati, Advocate. versus DDA & ANR. Through: % ..... Respondents Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate. Date of Decision : February 19, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The present petition seeks to impugn Show Cause Notice dated 17.09.2009 and Final Show Cause Notice dated 04.11.2009, as also cancellation order dated 06.01.2011 and letter dated 25.03.2011 of the Respondent/DDA seeking to take back the physical possession of the Plot No.273, Pocket-III, Block-C, Sector-28, Rohini measuring 60 sq. mtrs. The Petitioners also seek mandamus to the Respondent/DDA not to dispossess and interfere in any manner whatsoever with the peaceful enjoyment and possession of the said plot of land presently in possession of the Petitioners.2. Notice of the petition was issued to the Respondents and upon the Respondents accepting notice,...
Birender Thakur Vs. Delhi Jal Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
$~32. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10993/2009 % Judgment dated 19.02.2013 BIRENDER THAKUR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Manoj Gupta, Adv. versus DELHI JAL BOARD Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Suresh Tripathi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner claims compensation in the sum of Rs.10.00 lakhs for the inaction and careless attitude of the respondent in attending the complaints of the petitioner and the general public, especially, in the outskirts of Delhi where the open manholes have become death traps.2. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. As per the petitioner, petitioner was residing in a rented accommodation with his family at C-272-A, Ashok Nagar, Delhi. The petitioner is a barber by profession. On 17.5.2009 at about 10.15 a.m. a water tanker of the respondent, Delhi Jal Board, arrived at C-Block, Pump House, N...
Airports Authority of India Vs. Daya Nand and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
$~R1-~R6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 31st, 2013 Pronounced on: February 19th, 2013 % + LPA 429/2007 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Digvijay Rai, Adv. Versus NIRMALA DEVI & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms. Shruti Verma, Advocates. Mr Rajiv Bansal and Mr Rahul Bhandari, Advs. for DDA Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for Nodal Officer Mr Milanka Chaudhury and Mr Abhishek Sharma, Advs. for DIAL Mr. Dipesh Chaudhary and Mr. Kunwar Udai Bhan, Advocates And + LPA 431/2007 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr Digvijay Rai, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus DAYA NAND & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Adv with Mr Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms Shruti Verma, Advs for respondent No.1 Mr Rajiv Bansal and Mr Rahul Bhandari, Advs. for DDA Mr Milanka Chaudhury and Mr Abhishek Sharma, Advs. for DIAL Mr. Sanjay K. Pathak, Advocate for LAC/Nodal Officer And + LPA 432/2007 AI...
Dalail Singh Vs. Lachman Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 36/1979 & C.M. Nos.861, 1071, 1074/1997, 188/1998,14411-14426/2007 Decided on :19. h February, 2013 DALAIL SINGH Through: Appellant Mr. C.S. Dahiya, Advocate. Versus LACHMAN SINGH & ORS Through: Respondents Mr. Vipin K. Singh, Advocate for LRs of R-1 to 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal which has been pending since 1979. More than 32 years have passed and the appeal is still pending final adjudication. Today also, a request for adjournment is made on the ground that Mr. Y.D. Nagar, the learned counsel for the appellant has gone for some urgent work and, therefore, a date be given. It is not possible to adjourn the matter as it is one of the oldest matter pending in this court.2. Vide order dated 30.7.1979, this appeal was admitted and three substantial questions of law purported to be arising from the appeal were formulated by Honble Mr. Justice Yogeshwar Dayal (as his Lordship then w...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »