Delhi Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds - plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr. K.C.Sharma Vs. Bses Yamuna Power Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No. 2107/2000 % February 28, 2013 MR. K.C.SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K.Saini with Mr. Vikram Saini, Advs. versus BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar with Ms. Prerna Mehta & Mr. Amit Kumar, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Counsel for the parties have been heard at length. The present petition impugns the order dated 21.10.1999 of the disciplinary authority setting aside the findings and conclusions of the enquiry officer dated 1.12.1994. The order of the disciplinary authority reads as under:O R D E R WHEREAS the disciplinary proceeding under Regulation 7 of the Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (DMC) Service (C&A) Regulations 1976 was initiated against h.K.C.Sharma, Asst. Acctt. Vide memo not VC-31-33/94Vig/TS/553 dated 1/12/94. AND WHEREAS the case of Sh.K.C.Sharma was referred to regular depar...
Morepen Laboratories Ltd Vs. Phafag Ag and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:28. 02.2013 + FAO(OS) 7/2013 MOREPEN LABORATORIES LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Gandhi and Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocates. versus ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karan Luthra, Ms. Noomi Chandra and Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, Advocates for respondent nos.1&2. PHAFAG AG AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. This appeal, under Section 37(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) challenges the judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 29.08.2012, dismissing the appellants objections under Section 34 of the said Act, to an Award.2. The brief facts are that the respondents (collectively known as Phafag in arbitral proceedings, and in the impugned judgment, and referred to as such) entered into two agreements with the appellant...
Sujeet Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~6-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:28. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 857/2013 RAMESH KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI AND ORS W.P.(C) 867/2013 SHRI SATYA NARAIN SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6274/2012 RAJENDER SINGH versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6969/2012, CM APPL.18089/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS PRADEEP KUMAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6970/2012 GOURI SHANKAR SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 7584/2012 SUBHASH CHAND versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI & ORS W.P.(C) 7585/2012 DEVIDAS BADGUJAR versus UOI & ORS WP (C) 365/2013 with connected matters ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Page 1 W.P.(C) 315/2013 BIJENDRA KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 361/2013 ..... Petitioner R.C.MANDI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) ...
Manohar Salimath Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~6-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:28. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 857/2013 RAMESH KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI AND ORS W.P.(C) 867/2013 SHRI SATYA NARAIN SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6274/2012 RAJENDER SINGH versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6969/2012, CM APPL.18089/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS PRADEEP KUMAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6970/2012 GOURI SHANKAR SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 7584/2012 SUBHASH CHAND versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI & ORS W.P.(C) 7585/2012 DEVIDAS BADGUJAR versus UOI & ORS WP (C) 370/2013 with connected matters ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Page 1 W.P.(C) 315/2013 BIJENDRA KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 361/2013 ..... Petitioner R.C.MANDI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) ...
Shri Satya NaraIn Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~6-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:28. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 857/2013 RAMESH KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI AND ORS W.P.(C) 867/2013 SHRI SATYA NARAIN SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6274/2012 RAJENDER SINGH versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6969/2012, CM APPL.18089/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS PRADEEP KUMAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6970/2012 GOURI SHANKAR SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 7584/2012 SUBHASH CHAND versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI & ORS W.P.(C) 7585/2012 DEVIDAS BADGUJAR versus UOI & ORS WP (C) 867/2013 with connected matters ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Page 1 W.P.(C) 315/2013 BIJENDRA KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 361/2013 ..... Petitioner R.C.MANDI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) ...
Geeta Khanna Vs. Manager Arvind Gupta Dav Centenary and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 117/2013 GEETA KHANNA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Prakash Kumar Singh, Adv. versus MANAGER ARVIND GUPTA DAV CENTENARY & ORS..... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 28.02.2013 CM 3544/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM 3545/2013 (delay) This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. In view of the submissions made therein, the application is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. LPA 117/2013 Vide appointment letter dated 22.8.1990, the appellant before us was appointed as a Nursery Teacher in the pay scale of Rs.1200-2040, in the nursery school being run by the respondents, though she claims that she was appointed on 11.7.1989. The appellant also claims that she had been discharging the duty of a Yoga Teacher and that in the staff s...
Ramesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~6-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:28. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 857/2013 RAMESH KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI AND ORS W.P.(C) 867/2013 SHRI SATYA NARAIN SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6274/2012 RAJENDER SINGH versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6969/2012, CM APPL.18089/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS PRADEEP KUMAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6970/2012 GOURI SHANKAR SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 7584/2012 SUBHASH CHAND versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI & ORS W.P.(C) 7585/2012 DEVIDAS BADGUJAR versus UOI & ORS WP (C) 857/2013 with connected matters ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Page 1 W.P.(C) 315/2013 BIJENDRA KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 361/2013 ..... Petitioner R.C.MANDI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) ...
Devidas Badgujar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~6-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:28. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 857/2013 RAMESH KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI AND ORS W.P.(C) 867/2013 SHRI SATYA NARAIN SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6274/2012 RAJENDER SINGH versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6969/2012, CM APPL.18089/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS PRADEEP KUMAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6970/2012 GOURI SHANKAR SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 7584/2012 SUBHASH CHAND versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI & ORS W.P.(C) 7585/2012 DEVIDAS BADGUJAR versus UOI & ORS WP (C) 7585/2012 with connected matters ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Page 1 W.P.(C) 315/2013 BIJENDRA KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 361/2013 ..... Petitioner R.C.MANDI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C)...
Satish Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~6-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:28. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 857/2013 RAMESH KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI AND ORS W.P.(C) 867/2013 SHRI SATYA NARAIN SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6274/2012 RAJENDER SINGH versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6969/2012, CM APPL.18089/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS PRADEEP KUMAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6970/2012 GOURI SHANKAR SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 7584/2012 SUBHASH CHAND versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI & ORS W.P.(C) 7585/2012 DEVIDAS BADGUJAR versus UOI & ORS WP (C) 366/2013 with connected matters ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Page 1 W.P.(C) 315/2013 BIJENDRA KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 361/2013 ..... Petitioner R.C.MANDI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) ...
Cit Vs. Titan Securities Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h December, 2012 Date of Decision:28. h February 2013 % + ITA 263/2012 CIT Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. TITAN SECURITIES LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. S. Krishnan, Advocate. versus CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.This is an appeal by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). It is directed against the order dated 14.06.2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in ITA No.2654/Del/2009 for the assessment year 2001-02. The following questions, stated to be the substantial questions of law have been proposed by the revenue: I. Whether Honble ITAT was correct in deleting the addition of Share Application Money u/s 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961 when the Assessing Officer had comprehensively proved that the applicants had no creditworthiness and their genuineness &...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »