Delhi Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahant Sharda Ram(Decd.) Thr. Lr???s Vs. D.D.A. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. NO.71 OF 200.& CM 3567/2004 Decided on :21. t February, 2013 MAHANT SHARDA RAM(DECD.) THR. LRS Appellant Through: Mr.Ajay Bahl, Adv. Versus D.D.A. & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Advocate for the DDA. Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate for R-5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. The learned counsel has not been able to make out any substantial question of law in the present appeal.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant Mahant Sharda Ram (since deceased), now represented by his wife and son filed a suit for declaration against the respondents way back on 16.4.1966. The declaration which was sought by Mahant Sharda Ram was that the land situated in Khasra no.148, Min. situated at Bela Estate, Delhi comprising of 4 bighas 1 biswas pukh according to Jamabandi F 1952-53, is a Wakf property which was ori...
Subhash Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :11. h February, 2013 DECIDED ON :21. t February, 2013 + CRL.A. 131/2010 SUBHASH Through : ....Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr.Shiv Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI .Respondent Through : Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. SI Prahlad Meena, PS Mayur Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant- Subhash impugns judgment dated 06.07.2009 and order on sentence dated 18.07.2009 in Sessions Case No.86/2006 arising out of FIR No. 445/2005 PS Mayur Vihar by which he was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 392/397/34 IPC and 25 Arms Act. He was sentenced to undergo RI for four years with fine ` 3,000/- under Section 392 IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for three months. He was further sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine ` 5,000/- under Section 397 IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for five months. He was als...
R N Malhotra Vs. Surender Kumar JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:21. t February, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2783/2010 R N MALHOTRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate versus SURENDER KUMAR JAIN & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Surender Chauhan, Advocate for R-1 Mr.S.K.Kalia, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The present Petition is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in CRL.M.C. 2782/2010 titled R.N. MALHOTRA v. BHUPESH KUMAR JAIN & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE FEBRUARY 21 2013 vk...
ic-48821m Lt. Col. Alok Kaushik (Retd) Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 1096/2013 IC-48821M LT. COL. ALOK KAUSHIK (RETD) ..... Appellant Through: Sh. S.S. Pandey, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 14.02.2013 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), Principal Bench, New Delhi dismissing his Original Application (OA) No. 44/2013 filed by him challenging the order dated 27.07.2011 issued by the respondents in New Delhi.2. The brief facts are that the Petitioner had cited medical problems and applied for Premature Retirement (PMR) on 07.03.2011. The application was approved by the third respondent by order dated 04.05.2011. The said order directed the Petitioner to proceed on PMR with effect from 01.08.2011.3. On 09.07.2011, before the date of s...
Tata Motors Limited Vs. Jsc Vtb Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on : February 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on :February 21, 2013 FAO(OS) 364/2012 TATA MOTORS LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Mr.Arush Khanna, Ms.Jaishree Shukla, Advocates. versus JSC VTB BANK . ...Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Advocate. AND FAO(OS) 393/2012 TATA MOTORS LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Mr.Arush Khanna, Ms.Jaishree Shukla, Advocates. versus JSC VTB BANK ....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Advocate. AND FAO(OS) 394/2012 TATA MOTORS LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Mr.Arush Khanna, Ms.Jaishree Shukla, Advocates. versus JSC VTB BANK ....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr.Advocate instructed ...
Societe Generale Vs. Daewoo Motors India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Co. Pet. No. 66 of 2003 SOCIETE GENERALE Through: ..... Petitioner None versus DAEWOO MOTORS INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Nair, Advocate for Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Advocate for Pan India Motors Mr. Dhruv Dewan, Advocate for ARCIL Mr. Ajay Bhatnagar, Advocate for Applicants/employees Mr. Deepak Prakash & Mr. M.K. Tiwari, Advocates for Workmen Mr. Ramesh Gopinathan, Advocate for the Receiver, DRT, Mumbai Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for the Official Liquidator CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER 21 02.2013 Co. App. Nos.470 of 2008, 686 of 2008, 1648 of 2012, 1650 of 2012 (by the workmen) and 924 of 2011 (by the Official Liquidator ) in Co. Pet. No.66 o1. The Respondent company, Daewoo Motors India Ltd. was ordered by this Court to be provisionally wound up on 24th November 2003 and finally wound up on 28th July 2004. The Official Liquidator (OL) attached to this Court had been appointed as the Liquidator.2. Prior thereto, in the pro...
R N Malhotra Vs. Bhupesh Kumar JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:21. t February, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2786/2010 R N MALHOTRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate versus BHUPESH KUMAR JAIN & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Surender Chauhan, Advocate for R-1 Mr. S.K.Kalia, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The present Petition is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in CRL.M.C. 2782/2010 titled R.N. MALHOTRA V. BHUPESH KUMAR JAIN & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE FEBRUARY 21 2013 vk...
Amrita Datla Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
$-10 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :21. t February, 2013 % + W.P.(C) No.2274/2012 & CM No.4873/2012 SUNIL BHARDWAJ Through : ..... Petitioner Major K. Ramesh and Ms. Archana Ramesh, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. for Medical Council of India. W.P.(C) No.2276/2012 and CM No.4875/2012 BRIJPAL UPADHYAY Through : ..... Petitioner Major K. Ramesh and Ms. Archana Ramesh, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. for Medical Council of India. W.P.(C) 2277/2012 and CM No.4876/2012 AMRITA DATLA Through : WP(C)2274 & 2276-79/2012 ..... Petitioner Ms. Archana Ramesh, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS. Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. for Medical Council of India. W.P.(C) 2278/2012 and CM No.4877/2012 RANJIT PAL SINGH BHOGAL ..... Petitioner Through : Major K. Ramesh and...
Nisarga Nature Club Vs. Shri Satyawan B Prabhudessai Gaonkarwadem-usga ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
By this Application, Applicant seeks withdrawal of permission granted on 2nd April, 2008 by Additional Collector-II, South Goa Distt., Margao to convert a part of land in survey no. 25/2 from agricultural to non-agricultural purpose. In addition, the Applicant further seeks restitution of the balance area out of 74,875 sq. mtrs. in Survey No. 25/2, which has been deforested by felling of trees by Respondent No. 1, along with payment of costs as well as initiation of criminal action against him for committing forest offence. 2. Nisarga Nature Club, the Applicant in this case, is a Registered Society having its office at Aquem, Margao, Goa. There is no dispute about the fact that Respondent No. 1 (Satyawan B. Prabhudessai) owns land in Survey No. 25/2 situated at Village Sangod in Sanguem Taluka, (Goa). Somewhere in December, 2009, the then President of the Applicant Society noticed felling of certain trees in Survey No. 25/2. He, therefore, made a complaint dated 8th December, 2009 to t...
Ankur Arora @ Lucky Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h February, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2566/2012 ANKUR ARORA @ LUCKY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Teotia, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. Mr. Vipin Kalra, Adv. for R-2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Petitioner invokes the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) for setting aside of the order dated 11.11.2011 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) whereby the Petitioners complaint filed against Respondents No.2 and 3 for offences under Sections 323/341/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was dismissed in default. The Petitioner preferred a Revision Petition under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) which came to be dismissed by an order dated 16.12.2011.2. The ground taken up by the Pet...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »