Delhi Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
indus Towers Limited Vs. Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt. Ltd. and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: February 21, 2013 + FAO(OS) 97/2013 INDUS TOWERS LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Ruchi Agnihotri, Ms.Smarika Singh, Ms.Shreya Sircar,Advocates versus UNITECH WIRELESS (TAMIL NADU) PVT. LTD. AND ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayyar, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Ashish Bhan, Ms. Padmaja Kaul, Advocates for R.1. Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Ashish Dholakia, Mr.Ashish Bhan, Advocate for R.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Deciding FAO (OS) No.613/2012 and FAO (OS) No.614/2012 filed by the respondents herein i.e. Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt. Ltd. and Telewings Communication Services Pvt. Ltd. respectively, on December 21, 2012, one of us : Pradeep Nandrajog, J.who had authored the decision, had referred to the fear of the unknown which had compelled Viom Networks ...
Javed Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :21st February, 2013 % + CRL.A. 843/2009 JAVED Through: .....Appellant Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The complainant, in this case, is mother of the child victim and wife of the appellant. Her miseries seem to be never ending as despite being married twice, she could not lead a peaceful matrimonial life and now is burdened with the responsibility to maintain not only herself but also four children i.e. two children from her first marriage and two children from her second marriage with appellant, the eldest one is the traumatized girl just 8 years old who has been sexually assaulted by her second husband i.e. step-father of the child victim.2. It was not the first instance that the complainant knew about the ill-intentions of the appellant qua his step-daughter i.e. the child victim S (name of the child ...
R N Malhotra Vs. Bhupesh Kumar JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:21. t February, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2782/2010 R N MALHOTRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate versus + BHUPESH KUMAR JAIN & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Surender Chauhan, Advocate for R-1 Mr. S.K.Kalia, Advocate for R-3 CRL.M.C. 2783/2010 R N MALHOTRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate versus SURENDER KUMAR JAIN & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondent Mr.Surender Chauhan, Advocate for R-1 Mr.S.K.Kalia, Advocate for R-3 CRL.M.C. 2785/2010 R N MALHOTRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate versus SURENDER KUMAR JAIN & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Surender Chauhan, Advocate for R-1 Mr.S.K.Kalia, Advocate for R-3 + CRL.M.C. 2786/2010 R N MALHOTRA Through: Crl.MC 2782/2010 Etc. ..... Petitioner Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate Page 1 of 15 versus BHUPESH KUMAR JAIN & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Surender Chauhan, Advocate for R-1 Mr. S.K.Kalia, Advoc...
R N Malhotra Vs. Surender Kumar JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:21. t February, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2785/2010 R N MALHOTRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate versus SURENDER KUMAR JAIN & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Surender Chauhan, Advocate for R-1 Mr.S.K.Kalia, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The present Petition is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in CRL.M.C. 2782/2010 titled R.N. MALHOTRA v. BHUPESH KUMAR JAIN & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE FEBRUARY 21 2013 vk...
K.L. Sharma Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % RESERVED ON:31. 01.2013 DECIDED ON:21. 02.2013 + WP (C) 5499/2000 K.L. SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Dewan, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Saqib, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT 1 The petitioner in this proceeding, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges and seeks quashing of the order dated 5.9.1997 issued by the second respondent, i.e., Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) removing him from its service.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner joined the services of CRPF on 6.1.1971 as a Constable/Sepoy; he was promoted later on 4.11.1985 to the post of Lance Naik and later on 15.3.1988 as Naik. He was promoted yet again on 24.11.1991 as Head Constable.3. Whilst in service and on duty, the petitioner by virtue of a movement order dated 27.2.1997, went to Jammu for convoy duty and collection...
Rajbir Khatri Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: February 21, 2013 + W.P.(C) 899/2013 RAJBIR KHATRI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Anjum Javed, Advocate for R1 & 2. Ms.Avnish Ahlawat with Ms.Latika Choudhry, Advocate for R-3 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. By way of this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has challenged the order dated October 10, 2011 passed in OA No.3271/2009 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as `the Tribunal) whereby the application of petitioner for appointment to the post of Driver with DTC has been dismissed.2. Briefly the facts relevant for deciding the present petition are as under:Respondent-Delhi Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the DTC) advertised 10000 posts of Drive...
Tribhuwan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t February, 2013 + CRL. A.845/2009 TRIBHUWAN Through: ..... Appellant Thakur Virender Pratap Singh Charak with Mr. R.P.S. Tomar, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This Appeal is directed against a judgment dated 27.05.2009 and an order on sentence dated 29.05.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge(ASJ) in Sessions Case No.47/2007 FIR No.258/2007 registered at P.S. Model Town whereby the Appellant was held guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 376/363 IPC. He was sentenced to undergo RI for 05 years and to pay a fine of `500/- or in default to undergo RI for 06 months for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC; he was further sentenced to undergo RI for 03 years and to pay a fine of `100/- or in default to undergo RI for one month for the offence punishable under Section ...
Mukesh Gupta and ors Vs. Daljeet Singh Uberoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : January 21 , 2013 DECIDED ON : February21, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 163/2012 & CRL.M.A.613/2012 MUKESH GUPTA & ORS Through : ..... Petitioners Mr.Fanish K.Jain, Advocate VERSUS DALJEET SINGH UBEROI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Azhar Dayan, Advocate with Ms.Sanjita & Ms.Adity Marvah, Advocates CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of the order dated 04.09.2010 by which they were summoned by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in complaint case No.1797/01/07 for committing offence under Section 447 IPC.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record. It reveals that the respondent filed complaint case against the petitioners for committing offences under Sections 420/468/470/471/420B read with Section 378/447/446 IPC. The respondent alleged that he and his two brothers applied for an industrial plot with Delhi ...
Uma Walia Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.6072/2011 % February 21, 2013 UMA WALIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Baljit Singh, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate for respondent Nos.1,2 and 3. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Though there are two reliefs sought in the present petition, counsel for the petitioner confines the relief prayed to grant of monetary benefits as per the sixth pay commission report.2. The petitioner was a teacher of the respondent No.4-shcool and she retired on 31.1.2011.3. The Director of Education vide order dated 11.2.2009 in exercise of powers under Sections 17(3), 24(3), 18(4) and (5) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 and Rules 50,51,177 and 180 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 and all other enabling powers directed the schools in De...
Tata Motors Limited Vs. Jsc Vtb Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on : February 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on :February 21, 2013 FAO(OS) 364/2012 TATA MOTORS LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Mr.Arush Khanna, Ms.Jaishree Shukla, Advocates. versus JSC VTB BANK . ...Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Advocate. AND FAO(OS) 393/2012 TATA MOTORS LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Mr.Arush Khanna, Ms.Jaishree Shukla, Advocates. versus JSC VTB BANK ....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Advocate. AND FAO(OS) 394/2012 TATA MOTORS LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Mr.Arush Khanna, Ms.Jaishree Shukla, Advocates. versus JSC VTB BANK ....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr.Advocate instructed ...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »