Delhi Court February 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 21 2013

Shubit Education Society Vs. Govt. of Nct and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:19. 02.2013 Judgment pronounced on :21. 02.2013 LPA 724/2012 and CM No. 18578/2012 (placing additional documents) SHUBIT EDUCATION SOCIETY ..... Appellant Through: Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv with Mr Gaurav Mitra, Mr Shivshankar Panicker and Mr Vineeth Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms Zubeda Begum with Ms Sana Ansari Advs for Respondents 1 and 2 Mr Rajiv Bansal with Mr Rahul Bhandari, Advs for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The appellant society, which was desirous of establishing a middle school, sought to obtain allotment of land from DDA on which the proposed school could be set up. One of the requirements of DDA for allotment of land was Essentiality Certificate to be issued by Directorate of Education, Delhi in terms of the Rule 44 of Delhi School Education Rules, 1973. Vide Certificate dated 09.07.2001, Directorate of Education, Delhi ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2013

Sunil Bhardwaj Vs. Uoi and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2013

$-10 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :21. t February, 2013 % + W.P.(C) No.2274/2012 & CM No.4873/2012 SUNIL BHARDWAJ Through : ..... Petitioner Major K. Ramesh and Ms. Archana Ramesh, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. for Medical Council of India. W.P.(C) No.2276/2012 and CM No.4875/2012 BRIJPAL UPADHYAY Through : ..... Petitioner Major K. Ramesh and Ms. Archana Ramesh, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. for Medical Council of India. W.P.(C) 2277/2012 and CM No.4876/2012 AMRITA DATLA Through : WP(C)2274 & 2276-79/2012 ..... Petitioner Ms. Archana Ramesh, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS. Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. for Medical Council of India. W.P.(C) 2278/2012 and CM No.4877/2012 RANJIT PAL SINGH BHOGAL ..... Petitioner Through : Major K. Ramesh and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2013

Major Arvind Kumar Suhag Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. 02.2013 Decided on:21. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 4488/2012 MAJOR ARVIND KUMAR SUHAG ..... Petitioner Through : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Deepali Dwivedi, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate, for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % When you go home Tell them, for their Today, we gave our Tomorrow 1. The petitioner seeks appropriate directions, in these proceedings, to the respondents, to grant him war injury pension, in accordance with the extant guidelines and circulars on the subject.2. The facts, which are not in controversy, are that the petitioner was working in the Indian Army from 7-6-1997, when he received his permanent commission. In June, 1999, he was posted to 402 Lt. AD W.P.(C)4488/2012 Page 1 Regt, at Batalik sector during Operation Vijay at Kargil. As an active partici...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2013

Mohd. Kallu Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:21. t February, 2013 + CRL.A. 214/2010 .. Appellant MOHD. KALLU Through: Thakur Virender Pratap Singh Charak Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. This Appeal is directed against a judgment dated 25.09.2009 and an order on sentence dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge(ASJ) in Sessions Case No.351/2007 FIR No.186/2007 P.S. Jahangir Puri whereby the Appellant was held guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 342 and 506 IPC. He was sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years and to pay a fine of `7,000/- or in default to undergo SI for five months for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC; he was sentenced to undergo RI for six months for the offence punishable under Section 342 IPC; he was further sentenced to undergo RI for two years and to pay a ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2013

Saundhi Builders and Developers (Pb) P.Ltd. and anr. Vs. State and anr ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. M.C. No. 941/2011 Date of Decision:21. t February, 2013 + # ! SAUNDHI BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS (PB) P. LTD. & ANR. ....Petitioner Through: Mr. J.M. Bari, Advocate Versus $ STATE & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State Mr. Tarun Chandiok, Advocate for R-2 * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(Cr.P.C. in short) the petitioners have prayed for the setting aside of the order dated 27th January, 2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in revision petition no. 69/10 under Section 397 Cr.P.C. whereby the complaint case no.5757/06 filed by respondent no.2 herein under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881, which was dismissed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate on 14th July, 2010 due to non appearance of the complainant, was ordered to be restored.2. The petitioner no.1 Company and petitioner no.2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2013

Merck Kgaa and anr. Vs. Eaco Labs Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2013

F-3A $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1203/2008 MERCK KGaA AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Anju Aggarwal, Advocate. versus EACO LABS LTD. Through: None. ..... Defendant Date of Decision:21. t February, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction to restrain infringement and passing off of plaintiffs mark IMABEQ as well as rendition of accounts, damages and delivery. The prayers in the plaint are reproduced hereinbelow:a. a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, by himself, his servants, agents assigns etc. from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in pharmaceutical preparations under the trademark IMA or any other trade mark identical, deceptively and/or confusingly similar to the trade mark IMABEQ so as to infringe plaintiffs trade mark Registration no.1300766. b. A decree for permanent injunction restrai...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2013

State Vs. Jitender

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 11.2011 Decided on:21. 02.2013 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 1/2011 .Petitioner STATE Versus .Respondent JITENDER + CRL. A. 912/2011 .Appellant JITENDER Versus .Respondents STATE Through: Sh. Trideep Pais and Sh. Shivam Sharma, Advocates, on behalf of Jitender. Sh. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC (Crl), for the State. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present judgment will dispose of Death Reference No. 1/2011 under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the accuseds appeal, being Crl.A. 912/2011 impugning his conviction, and the imposition of death penalty, by the judgment and order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-01 (Central), Delhi, dated 24.12.2010 and 10.01.2011 respectively, in S.C. No. 69/2009.2. The appellant (Jitender, referred to variously by his name, or as Death Sent. 1/11 & Crl.A.912/11 Page 1 the Appellant), was convicted for the offence under S...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2013

Tata Motors Limited Vs. Jsc Vtb Bank

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on : February 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on :February 21, 2013 FAO(OS) 364/2012 TATA MOTORS LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Mr.Arush Khanna, Ms.Jaishree Shukla, Advocates. versus JSC VTB BANK . ...Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Advocate. AND FAO(OS) 393/2012 TATA MOTORS LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Mr.Arush Khanna, Ms.Jaishree Shukla, Advocates. versus JSC VTB BANK ....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Advocate. AND FAO(OS) 394/2012 TATA MOTORS LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Mr.Arush Khanna, Ms.Jaishree Shukla, Advocates. versus JSC VTB BANK ....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr.Advocate instructed ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2013