Delhi Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Uoi Vs. Gm Jagannadharao and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : February 07, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : February 25, 2013 + WP(C) 3387/2011 UOI .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Ajay Vikram Singh, Advocate versus GM JAGANNADHARAO & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Y.Raja Gopala Rao, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. In the early sixties the Government of India took a decision to give impetus to Public Sector Undertakings in the core industrial sectors and initially sent government servants on deputation to various Public Sector Undertakings. With passage of time it was found desirable that some deputationists could be absorbed in these Public Sector Undertakings and a methodology devised to protect the service rendered while under the Government for purposes of pension as also receive terminal benefits upon superannuation from the Public Sector Enterprises was the concept o...
Mor Pal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3962/2012 Judgment delivered on:25. h February, 2013 MOR PAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr.SaurabhKansal, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Naveen Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR 1 By this petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the petitioner seeks to challenge the impugned order dated 12.10.2010 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the application filed by the petitioner accused under Section 6, 7, 18 and 49 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 for sending his case to the Juvenile Justice Board.2. The petitioner, who has claimed himself to be a juvenile at the time of commission of the alleged offence, is accused in FIR bearing No. 78/2009 registered against him along with the co-accused persons under Sections 365/302 IPC. This FIR was registered at t...
Ms.Parveen Vs. Management, Little Flowers Public Sr. Sec. School
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 180/2012 25th February, 2013 MS.PARVEEN Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. M.P.Singh Rathee, Advocate. VERSUS MANAGEMENT, LITTLE FLOWERS PUBLIC SR. SEC. SCHOOL & ANR. ...... Respondent Through: Mr. S.B.Tripathi, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. for Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By the present writ petition the petitioner seeks re-employment upto the age of 62 years after superannuating at the age of 60 years.2. This issue is no longer res integra that the entitlement of a person is only to be considered for employment and there is no automatic right to reemployment vide Chander Prabha Sood vs Director of Education and Anr., 179 (2011) DLT 486.There are also similar other judgments of this Court.3. I may state that it was contended on behalf of the respondent no.2/Director of Education that the aforesaid issue of re...
Natasha Kohli Vs. Man Mohan Kohli
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 06, 2013 Pronounced on: February 25, 2013 + Crl. M.C. No.1058/2009 NATASHA KOHLI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Ms. Anu Bagai & Mr. Bhuvan Mishra, Advocates versus MAN MOHAN KOHLI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Harsh Jaidka & Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT 1 Petitioner is the wife of respondent. They had married in Delhi in November, 1994 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. In January, 2007 respondent had purportedly learnt that petitioner's marriage with Mr. Boccagna in Florida, USA is still subsisting, which led to filing of a criminal complaint under Sections 494/495/420 of the IPC (Annexure P-6) by respondent against petitioner, which was registered as CC No.13/3/8. Petitioner has been summoned in the above said complaint vide impugned order of 7th March, 2009 (Annexure P-9) to face the proceedings under Sections 494/495 of the IPC.2. In this petition, p...
Raj Kumar Vs. the State of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. M.C. No. 3748/2010 Date of Decision:25. h February, 2013 + # ! RAJ KUMAR ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prem Kumar, Mr. Ashish Kumar Sharma and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocates Versus $ * THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This petition is filed by the petitioner-complainant under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973(in short Cr.P.C.) challenging the order dated 11th May, 2010 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate whereby his criminal complaint filed against respondents no. 2-5 herein was dismissed as well as the order dated 3rd August, 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the said order of the Magistrate was also dismissed.2. The relevant portions from the complaint of the petitioner-complainant filed in the Magistrates Court are rereproduced belo...
Union of India Vs. Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:25.02.2013 FAO(OS) NO.113/2013 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajeev Mehra, ASG with Ms.Swati Sinha and Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, CGSC. versus HIMACHAL FUTURISTIC COMMUNICATIONS LTD. .. Respondent Through: Mr.Bishwajit Bhattacharya, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Chandra Chur Bhattacharya, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) Cav. No.161/2013 (Caveat) Counsel for the respondent has entered appearance. Caveat stands discharged. CM No. 3292-93/2013 (Exemption) 1 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO (OS) No. 113/2013 & CM Nos.3291/2013 (stay) & 3294/2013 (for calling the record) 2 The impugned order dated 05.12.2012 had dismissed the objections filed by the objector/Union of India under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). 3 M/s Hindustan Teleprinters Limited (HTL) was incorpora...
Shamshad Ali @ Naturia Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :7. h February, 2013 DECIDED ON :25. h February, 2013 + CRL.A. 870/2001 SHAMSHAD ALI @ NATURIA ....Appellant Through : Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant- Shamshad Ali @ Naturia impugns judgment and order on sentence dated 29.03.2001 in Sessions Case No. 62/1996 arising out of FIR No. 268/1992 PS Civil Lines by which he was convicted with his associates- Ashwini Kumar and Bhushan Kumar for committing offence punishable under Section 398 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for seven years.2. Allegations against the accused were that on 20.08.1992 at 02.45 A.M. at North End Road near Flag Staff Road, he and his associates- Ashwini Kumar and Bhushan Kumar robbed Ram Kishore of `1,500/- at the point of knife.3. The prosecution examined six witnesses. In his 313 Cr.P.C. statement, the accused pleaded fals...
National Institute of Medical Sciences and Researc Vs. Board of Govern ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C)6258/2012, W.P.(C)6259/2012, W.P.(C)6260/2012, W.P.(C)6265/2012, W.P.(C)6266/2012 & W.P.(C) 335/2013 % Judgment dated 25.02.2013 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Srikant Mishra and Ms.Charu Ambwani, Advocates versus BOARD OF GOVERNORS IN SUPER SESSION OF MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Amit Kumar and Mr.Ashish Kumar, Advocates for the MCI. Mr.Amrit Pal Singh and Mr.Rupinder Pal Singh, Advocates for the respondent no.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Although notice to show cause has only been issued in W.P.(C) 335/2013 and counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents in W.P.(C) 335/2013, short affidavits have been filed in all the matters. For the sake of convenience the facts of W.P.(C) 335/2013 are being noticed.2. The necessary facts, to be noticed for disposal of thes...
K.S. Rathi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 5489/1999 K.S.RATHI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. H.S. Dahiya, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: .... Respondents Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner impugns the order dismissing him from service, issued by the Commandant (CISF) on 2nd February, 1998.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner joined the services of the CISF some time in 1991. He was granted 3 days leave for the period 22nd October, 1995 to 24th October, 1995. He claimed that at the end of the period, he fell ill and, therefore, was unable to report for work and was on medical rest. To say so, he relies upon certain documents such as prescription of a medical practitioner etc, issued some time in the beginning of November, 1995. He also relies upon a copy of the W.P.(C)5489/1999 Page 1 prescription slip iss...
Mcd Represented by Its Commissioner Vs. Dr. Ved Prakash Kanoji and anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on : January 22, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : February 25, 2013 WP(C) 5544/2011 MCD REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER ...Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Yatendra Sharma, Advocate. versus DR. VED PRAKASH KANOJI & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.P.S.Bindra and Ms.Shweta Priyadarshini, Advocates for R-1. Mr.Rajshekhar Rao and Mr.Anand K.Mishra, Advocates for R-2. + WP(C) 4223/2012 DR.JAIRAJ SINGH SAGAR ...Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao, Advocate. versus MCD THRU COMMISSIONER .Respondents Represented by: Mr.Anubhav Mehrotra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. In the year 2001 Dr.Ved Prakash Kanoji and Dr.Jai Raj Singh Sagar were working on the posts of Deputy Health Officer and Resident Medical Superintendent respectively in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi.2. In the same year i.e. 2001, irregularities were detected in the purcha...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »