Delhi Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Subhash Chand Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~6-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:28. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 857/2013 RAMESH KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI AND ORS W.P.(C) 867/2013 SHRI SATYA NARAIN SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6274/2012 RAJENDER SINGH versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6969/2012, CM APPL.18089/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS PRADEEP KUMAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6970/2012 GOURI SHANKAR SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 7584/2012 SUBHASH CHAND versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI & ORS W.P.(C) 7585/2012 DEVIDAS BADGUJAR versus UOI & ORS WP (C) 7584/2012 with connected matters ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Page 1 W.P.(C) 315/2013 BIJENDRA KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 361/2013 ..... Petitioner R.C.MANDI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C)...
Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vidya Dhar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 28, 2013 + FAO(OS) 119/2013 MULTI SCREEN MEDIA PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.Dushyant Dave, Sr.Advocate, instructed by Mr.Vijay K.Sondhi, Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Mr.Varun Pareek and Mr.Suhail Malik, Advocates. versus VIDYA DHAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Giriraj Subramanium, Mr.Hitesh Saini and Ms.Zeeshan Hashmi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Freedom of speech which includes the right to freely express ones convictions and opinions by word of mouth, writing, printing and all other means (addressed to the eyes or the ears), is a freedom guaranteed to citizens of India under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The rationale for protecting freedom of speech has been variously stated by eminent writers and statesman. T.I. Emers...
R.C. Mandi Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~6-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:28. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 857/2013 RAMESH KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI AND ORS W.P.(C) 867/2013 SHRI SATYA NARAIN SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6274/2012 RAJENDER SINGH versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6969/2012, CM APPL.18089/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS PRADEEP KUMAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6970/2012 GOURI SHANKAR SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 7584/2012 SUBHASH CHAND versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI & ORS W.P.(C) 7585/2012 DEVIDAS BADGUJAR versus UOI & ORS WP (C) 361/2013 with connected matters ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Page 1 W.P.(C) 315/2013 BIJENDRA KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 361/2013 ..... Petitioner R.C.MANDI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) ...
Bses Rajdhani Power Limited Vs. Sk Bhatia and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~ 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4288/2011 & CM.8796/2011 % Judgment dated 28.02.2013 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Anupam Verma and Mr.Nikhil Sharma, Advocate versus SK BHATIA AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.N.K. Jha, Advocate for the MCD along with Mr.V.D. Sharma, A.E. (SDMC) Mr.R.L. Bhatia, Adv. for the R=1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition, petitioner seeks to challenge the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 2.5.2011 passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum by which on a complaint filed by respondent No. 1 the CGRF has directed the petitioner to shift an Electric Pole being an LV Main Pole near House No. 3/105 in Subhash Nagar area of New Delhi falling within the area of supply of the petitioner, without insisting for any cost for shifting of the Electric Pole. According to the petitioner, the impugned order is ag...
Premeshwar Roy Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~6-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:28. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 857/2013 RAMESH KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI AND ORS W.P.(C) 867/2013 SHRI SATYA NARAIN SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6274/2012 RAJENDER SINGH versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6969/2012, CM APPL.18089/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS PRADEEP KUMAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6970/2012 GOURI SHANKAR SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 7584/2012 SUBHASH CHAND versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI & ORS W.P.(C) 7585/2012 DEVIDAS BADGUJAR versus UOI & ORS WP (C) 363/2013 with connected matters ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Page 1 W.P.(C) 315/2013 BIJENDRA KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 361/2013 ..... Petitioner R.C.MANDI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) ...
Mmtc Limited Vs. International Commodities Export Corporation of Ne
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :20. 02.2013 Date of decision:28.02.2013 + FAO (OS) No.523/2012 MMTC LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sanat Kumar, Advocate. versus INTERNATIONAL COMMODITIES EXPORT CORPORATION OF NEW YORK ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Prashant P.Pratap, Sr.Adv. with Mr.O.P.Gaggar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The MMTC, the appellant, entered into an agreement dated 23.06.1992 with the International Commodities Export Corporation (respondent) for purchase of 80,000 MT of sulphur on C&F basis. The shipping arrangements had to be made by the respondent. This agreement contained an arbitration clause 16 providing for resolution of disputes through arbitration in India.2. The respondent entered into a Charter Party agreement on 19.09.1992 with M/s Lane Shipping Company Limited (as the vessel owner). In pursuance to the said arrangement, the shipment arrived through...
Amrik Singh Vs. Local Shopping Complex Welfare Association and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 240/2008 AMRIK SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Salil Paul, Adv. versus LOCAL SHOPPING COMPLEX WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 28.02.2013 Vide letter dated 25.5.1990, the Delhi Development Authority informed the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Traffic) that it had no objection to a taxi stand site being indicated on the layout plan of the Local Shopping Centre, Mayur Vihar, Phase-II, which could be allotted by the Land Department of DDA purely on temporarily basis, and on which no permanent structure was to be erected. Vide letter dated 29.11.1991, DDA informed the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Traffic) that DDA had no objection to issuance of a notification, notifying a general taxi stand at Local Shopping Complex, Mayur Vihar, Phase-II, New Delhi. Accordingly, a Notification dated 13.1.1992 was issued by Deputy C...
Dinesh Kuamr Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No. 2755/2011 % February 28, 2013 DINESH KUAMR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Advocate with Mr. H.P. Sahu, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. S.K. Taneja, Senior Advocate with Mr. Puneet Taneja, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner who is the son of the late Sh. Basant Lal, an employee of the respondent Nos.2 to 4/National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. (NHPC) seeks compassionate appointment on account of death of Sh. Basant Lal while still in service.2. The only averments which have been made in the writ petition are that late Sh. Basant Lal while returning back from duty died near Koti Bridge on account of a land slide, since he died when he was in employment with NHPC therefore, ...
Paresh Chandra Dey Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
$~6-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:28. 02.2013 + W.P.(C) 857/2013 RAMESH KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI AND ORS W.P.(C) 867/2013 SHRI SATYA NARAIN SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6274/2012 RAJENDER SINGH versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6969/2012, CM APPL.18089/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS PRADEEP KUMAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6970/2012 GOURI SHANKAR SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 7584/2012 SUBHASH CHAND versus ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents UOI & ORS W.P.(C) 7585/2012 DEVIDAS BADGUJAR versus UOI & ORS WP (C) 371/2013 with connected matters ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Page 1 W.P.(C) 315/2013 BIJENDRA KUMAR versus ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 361/2013 ..... Petitioner R.C.MANDI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) ...
Om Prakash and ors. Vs. Subhash Kapoor and ors Ac+
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 02.2013 + CS(OS) 908/1997 SUBHASH KAPUR Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv K. Nanda, Adv. Versus SURAJ PRAKASH KAPOOR AND ORS. B+ AC+ ... Defendant Through: Ms Prerna Mehta, Adv. for defendant No. 4, D-7 and D-8 Ms Kusum Sanehi, Adv. for D-5 Mr. Rajat Aneja with Ms Sumati Jumrani, Adv. for D-6 + CS(OS) 663/2006, I.A. 4472/2006 and I.A. 10414/2010 OM PRAKASH & ORS. Through: ..... Plaintiff Ms Prerna Mehta, Adv. Versus SUBHASH KAPOOR & ORS AC+ Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv K. Nanda, Adv. for D-2 Ms Kusum Sanehi, Adv. for D-5 Mr. Rajat Aneja with Ms Sumati Jumrani, Adv. for D-6 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. These two cases have been put up by learned Joint Registrar before the Court on the objection being raised by the learned counsel for the plaintiff Subhash Kapoor as regard to the extent of his cross examination as PW-1 by defen...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »