Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 02 2013

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited Vs. Anglo-french Drugs and Indus ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + IAs 16701/2011 (O.39 R.1 & 2 CPC) & 485/2012 (O.39 R.4 CPC) in CS(OS) 2596/2011 % Reserved on:11. h September, 2013 Decided on:2. d December, 2013 SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sachin Gupta, Mr. Shashi Ojha, Advs. versus ANGLO-FRENCH DRUGS AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ANR ..... Defendant Through Ms. Rajeshwari H, Mr. Hariharan, Ms. Urvashi Singh, Advs. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By IA167012011 under Order XXXIX Rule 1&2 CPC the plaintiff had sought ex-parte ad interim injunction against the defendant which was granted and thus it seeks the confirmation thereof till the disposal of the suit whereas by I.A No.485/2012 under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC the defendant seeks vacation of the interim order dated 18 th October, 2011 passed by this Court.2. A brief exposition of the facts is that the plaintiff is a pharmaceutical company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 which markets drugs and formulati...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2013

Union of India Vs. Ramesh Nair

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 21, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: December 02, 2013 + W.P.(C) No.7112/2013 UNION OF INDIA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG instructed by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.Aashish Gumber, Advocate versus RAMESH NAIR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Atul Nanda, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Rameeza Hakeem and Mr.Parinay T.Vasandani, Advocates AND + W.P.(C) No.7114/2013 UNION OF INDIA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG instructed by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.Aashish Gumber, Advocate versus RAMESH NAIR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Atul Nanda, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Rameeza Hakeem and Mr.Parinay T.Vasandani, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. By a common order dated February 27, 2013 the Central Administrative Tribunal has quashed two letters dated November 12, 2012 and December 06, 2012 sent by the pet...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2013

Sh Ashok Kumar Vs. Smt Surjit Kaur and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d December, 2013. % + RFA5402013 SH ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Malhotra with Dr. M.K. Gahlaut, Advs. versus SMT SURJIT KAUR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. M.K. Dua, Adv. for R-1 to 6. Mr. Yeeshu Jain & Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This appeal impugns the judgment and decree of the Court of the Addl. District Judge (Central) 08, Tis Hazari, Delhi of dismissal of Civil Suit No.172/13 (ID No.02401C0105852012) filed by the appellant consequent to the order of rejection of plaint, on the ground of the suit being by way of relitigation.2. The appeal came up before this Court first on 22nd November, 2013 when the counsel for the respondents no.1 to 6 as well as the counsel for the respondent no.7 Director of Rehabilitation, Land & Building Department appeared, being on caveat/on advance notice; though none appeared for the respondent no.8, the Sub...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2013

Rani Bhatia Vs. St. Stephens Hospital Society and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: October 24, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: December 02 , 2013 + W.P.(C) 6185/2013 RANI BHATIA Represented by: .....Petitioner Ms.Nitya Ram Krishan, Advocate with Ms.Amiy Shukla, Advocate versus ST.STEPHENS HOSPITAL SOCIETY & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajeev Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Sahil Bhalaik, Mr.Uddyam Mukherjee and Mr.Jayendera, Advocates for R-1 and R-2 Mr.Kushal Yadav, Advocate for Ms.Sonia Arora, Advocate for R-3 Mr.A.P.Singh, Advocate with Ms.Gurjinder Kaur, Advocate for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On September 17, 2013 News X Channel had put on the air a discussion/debate on the subject Profit over patients. It contained a dialogue between the anchor, the petitioner Dr.Rani Bhatia, Dr.Sudhir Joseph, the Director of St.Stephens Hospital, Dr.Puneet Bedi and Dr.Kaul. The precursor to the debate/discussion was services of t...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2013

Supreem Vs. University of Delhi and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:02. 12.2013 WP(C) No.5394 of 2012 RISHABH MALHOTRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nitish Kumar, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.5400 of 2012 PUSHPENDER Through: ..... Petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7608 of 2012 SHILPA DAS & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7633 of 2012 SUPREEM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7904 of 2012 PRIYANKA NAGPAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Moh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2013

Sh Om Dutt Sharma Vs. Sh Dheeraj and anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d December, 2013 % + RFA2972013 SH OM DUTT SHARMA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. V.P. Rana, Adv. versus SH DHEERAJ & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Adv. for R-2. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The appeal impugns a judgment and decree dated 11th February, 2013 of the Court of the Addl. District Judge-06 Central Delhi, of dismissal on the preliminary issue of limitation, of CS1362011 (Unique ID No.02401C0989222007) filed by the appellant.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and after service of the respondent no.2 and proceeding ex parte against the respondent no.1, the appeal admitted for hearing and considering that if the appeal were to be allowed, the parties will have to go through the trial, hearing of the appeal was expedited. The counsel for the appellant and the counsel for the respondent no.2 have been heard.3. The appellant on 3rd October, 2007 instituted the su...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2013

Rishabh Malhotra Vs. University of Delhi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2013

St. Anthonys Girls Sr. Sec. School Through Its Man Vs. Govt.of Nct of ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.1752/2013 2nd December, 2013 ST. ANTHONYS GIRLS SR. SEC. SCHOOL THROUGH ITS MANAGER & ANR. ......Petitioners Through: Mr. M.P.Raju, Advocate. VERSUS GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Adv. for R-1 to 4. Mr. M.P.Singh and Mr. R.L.Sharma, Advs. for R-5 with Ms. Garima Arya, R-5 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Certain litigations arise for being decided by Courts because of obstinacy of government departments in refusing to follow the established legal position. This is one of such cases which has to be decided by the Courts on account of perplexing refusal of the Director of Education to legally correct itself in spite of being pointed out the correct position in law. This refusal WPC17522013 bordering on unnecessary obstinacy which is Page 1 of 11 stated above arises from the applicability of the direct ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2013

Nishant JaIn Vs. State and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2013

$ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2564/2013 & Crl.M.A.9889/2013 Date of Decision:2. d December, 2013 PRATIK JAIN Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia and Mr. Prashant, Advocates Versus VED PRAKASH KAUSHIK & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sunil K. Jha, Advocate for R-1. Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State/R-2. AND + CRL.M.C. 3163/2013 & Crl.M.A.11812/2013 NISHANT JAIN Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia and Mr. Prashant, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. Through ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State/R-1 Mr. Sunil K. Jha, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J:1. Challenge in these petitions i.e. Crl.M.C. 2564/2013 and Crl.M.C. 3163/2013 is to the order dated 16.01.2013 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in Complaint Case No.259/12/12 u/s 138 read with Section 142 Negotiable Instruments Act whereby the petitioners were ordered to be summoned.2. The petitioners seek quashing of the summon...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2013

Daman Popli Vs. University of Delhi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.