Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Kishan Singh Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)7818/2008 RAM LAKHAN SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Nemo. Versus UOI & ANR Through: % ..... Respondents Mr.Sachin Datta, Adv. with Ms.Ritika Jhurani, Advs. Judgment Reserved on: November 11, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: December 02, 2013 CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT CHIEF JUSTICE :1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner, who is the father-in-law of the 2nd respondent, has approached this Court seeking two reliefs- one is to declare Section 27(1) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short the DV Act), as ultra vires Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and secondly to quash the proceedings under Section 12 of the D.V.Act, in complaint No.22487/2008 pending in the Court of Shri Sanjeev Kumar M.M. New Delhi.2. The specific case of the petitioner is that his son was married to the 2nd respondent in a ceremony that took place at Mumbai on 05.12.2007. After ...
Veena Sharma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:02. d DECEMBER, 2013 + BAIL APPLN. 1788/2013 SUMIT SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Kapoor , Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with ASI Ravi Shankar, PS Tilak Nagar. WITH + BAIL APPLN. 1789/2013 AMIT SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Kapoor , Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with ASI Ravi Shankar, PS Tilak Nagar. AND + BAIL APPLN. 1791/2013 VEENA SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Kapoor , Advocate. versus STATE Through: Bail Appln.Nos.1788-1791/2013 ..... Respondent Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with ASI Ravi Shankar, PS Tilak Nagar. Page 1 of 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Vide this common order, I shall dispose of bail application Nos. 1788/2013, 1789/2013 and 1791/2013 as all the bail applications have been filed in case FIR No.288/2013 u/s 354...
Seema Koshal Bhatnagar Vs. Tribal Co-operative Marketing Development F ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7613/2013 % 2nd December, 2013 SEEMA KOSHAL BHATNAGAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajinder Nischal, Advocate. Versus TRIBAL CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING DEVELOPMENT FEDERATION OF INDIA LIMITED Respondent Through: Mr. B.P. Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner impugns the orders of the departmental authorities; of the disciplinary authority dated 29.5.2012 and the appellate authority dated 14.2.2013; imposing upon the petitioner the punishment of removal from services.2. On account of misappropriation of money alleged against the petitioner and hence of corruption, chargesheet dated 9.8.2010 was issued to the petitioner. There were three charges against the petitioner. Charge No.I pertained to petitioner by means of being co-signatory on 16 cheques withdrawing amounts totaling to Rs.1,50,500/- which were not...
Siya Ram Mishra Vs. Central Bank of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5957/1999 % 2nd December, 2013 SIYA RAM MISHRA ......Petitioner Mr. Ambika Ray, Adv. Through: VERSUS CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. R.S.Mathur, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Counsel for the petitioner was heard at length. At the stage of dictation of the judgment, counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, who is present in Court, states that petitioner will be satisfied if he receives all the superannuation benefits taking as final and in terms of the order of the disciplinary authority dated 31.12.1996.2. As per the order of the disciplinary authority dated 31.12.1996/22.1.1997, petitioner was imposed the punishment of removal from services, however it was specifically with superannuation benefits. In view of the fact that the penalty order itself states that petitioner is entitled to all super...
Food Inspector/Food Safety Officer Vs. Mahabir
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
$~12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 698/2013 % Judgment dated 02.12.2013 FOOD INSPECTOR/FOOD SAFETY OFFICER Through : Mr.Manoj Ohri, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus MAHABIR ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI ORDER0212.2013 % CRL.M.A.18125/2013 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A.18126/2013 3. By the present application, the petitioner seeks condonation of delay in filing leave to appeal petition.4. Notice. Learned counsel for the State accepts notice and submits that he has no objection if the present application is allowed.5. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing present leave to appeal petition is condoned.6. Application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 698/2013 7. Present leave to appeal petition has been filed under Section 378 Cr.P.C. against the order of acquittal dated 2.11.2012 passed by learned ACMM, Delhi.8. The facts of this...
Food Inspector/Food Safety Officer Vs. Santosh Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
$~12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 696/2013 % Judgment dated 02.12.2013 FOOD INSPECTOR/FOOD SAFETY OFFICER Through : Mr.Manoj Ohri, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus SANTOSH SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI % CRL.M.A.18119/2013 ORDER0212.2013 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 696/2013 3. Present leave to appeal petition has been filed under Section 378 Cr.P.C. against the order of acquittal dated 28.8.2012 passed by learned ACMM, Delhi.4. The facts of this case, as noticed by the learned ACMM in the judgment, are as under:1. The present complaint has been filed on 11.12.2002 by the Delhi Administration through FI Sh. S.P. Singh against the above named accused persons. It is averred in the complaint that on 19.10.2001 at about 1:30 AM, FI Sh. S.B. Sharma lifted a sample of Full Cream Milk, a food article for analysis from a vehicle / Tanker No.UP-13 D-1285, whic...
Rahul Yadav Vs. the Govt of Nct and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:02. 12.2013 + W.P.(C) 4482/2013 RAHUL YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rajesh Tyagi, Adv. versus THE GOVT OF NCT & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajiv Nanda, Additional Standing Counsel along with Dr. Shalley Kamra, State Prog. Officer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) An inspection of the Ultrasound Clinic being run by the petitioner at 64, D/1, First Floor, Om Shanti Complex, Laxmi Market, Munirka, Delhi, was carried by the officials of the District Authority under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Technique (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as PC & PNDT Act) and a show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner on the spot in respect of Item No.6 and 7 of the said notice. Items No.6 and 7 of the notice read as under:-6. Register containing the information, as specified in Rule 9(1) of the Act, was not being maintained.7. Record in Form F, as presc...
Mcd and anr. Vs. Vidhyanand Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on November 27, 2013 Judgment Delivered on December 02, 2013 + W.P.(C) 931/2011 MCD & ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate versus VIDHYANAND SHARMA AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Raman Duggal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. Challenge is to the order dated October 08, 2009 disposing of TA No.1340/2009 with a direction to the petitioners to consider amending the recruitment rules to the post of Technical Supervisor in light of the observations made in the order as also the order dated December 09, 2010 dismissing RA No.48/2010 filed by the petitioners seeking review of the order dated October 08, 2009.2. The respondents who are 6 in number had initially filed a writ petition before this Court which was later transferred to the Tribunal praying for reliefs which inter-alia include to promote them to the post ...
Sumit Kumar Vs. University of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:02. 12.2013 WP(C) No.5394 of 2012 RISHABH MALHOTRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nitish Kumar, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.5400 of 2012 PUSHPENDER Through: ..... Petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7608 of 2012 SHILPA DAS & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7633 of 2012 SUPREEM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7904 of 2012 PRIYANKA NAGPAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Moh...
Shilpa Das and ors. Vs. University of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:02. 12.2013 WP(C) No.5394 of 2012 RISHABH MALHOTRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nitish Kumar, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.5400 of 2012 PUSHPENDER Through: ..... Petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7608 of 2012 SHILPA DAS & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7633 of 2012 SUPREEM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7904 of 2012 PRIYANKA NAGPAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Moh...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »