Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anand Kumar @beeru and ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:03.12.2013 CRL.A. No.772/2008 ANAND KUMAR @BEERU @ ORS. ..Appellants Through: Mr.Javed Hashmi, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: + ..Respondent. Ms.Richa Kapoor, APP. CRL.A. No.898/2008 CHARANJEET SINGH @ CHANNI. ..Appellant Through: Mr.Javed Hashmi, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: ..Respondent. Ms.Richa Kapoor, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 On 01.5.2000 at about 8.30 p.m. Ram Chander was stabbed by six persons; he was removed to the Babu Jagjivan Ram Hospital where he succumbed to his injuries at 10.00 p.m. Version of the prosecution was unfolded in the statement of Vinod Kumar (PW-2) who claimed to be an eye-witness. He stated that he was working as a helper at Sanjay Gandhi Transport Nagar for the last 7-8 years. Ram Chander (deceased) belonged to his native village. On the fateful day while he was returning home with the deceased they were att...
Mantoon Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
$~R-34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 03, 2013 + CRL.A. 174/2005 MANTOON KUMAR Through : Ms.Charu Verma, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) Appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 36-B of the NDPS Act 1985 read with Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 against the judgment and order on sentence by which the appellant stands convicted and sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/- under Section 20 of the NDPS Act. Case of the prosecution as noticed by the learned Trial Court is as under:(1) A secret information was received by SI K.L.Yadav which was recorded by him and conveyed to the SHO. A raiding party consisting of constable Dilbag, constable Ramesh and inspector Satyavrat was formed along with the informer. IO requested 4/5 passerby to join the investigation but none a...
C.P. Gupta (Former Director) Vs. National Productivity Council Through ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
P.K. Basu, Member (A) The applicant joined as Assistant Director in the respondent organization i.e. National Productivity Council (NPC) in 1969 and after serving the organization, retired as Director on 30.04.2002. This application has been filed by the applicant seeking the following reliefs: respondent to pay to the petitioner his due honorarium @ US$15 per page for 200 pages of editing and proof reading work completed by the petitioner for the programme organized by NPC in collaboration with Asian Productivity Organization (APO) after deducting NPC share; respondent to pay honorarium due to the petitioner @ US$500 per programme for the three programmes organized in collaboration with the Colombo Plan Secretariat (CPS) for discharging the duties of programme coordinator i.e. full payment amounting to US$1500; to release ex-gratia payment for the year 1994-95 to the petitioner in accordance with the rules of the NPC; to reimburse the medical claim of the petitioner to the tune of Rs....
Rfn. Prakash Singh Vs. Uoi
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
The petitioner in this O.A. has questioned the order whereby he has been struck off from the strength of service w.e.f. 16.11.2004. The present O.A. has become infructuous in view of the fact that a direction was issued by this Court in pursuance of which the petitioner continued to be in service till 22.08.2006. In view of this fact, the present O.A. has become academic in nature as the relief sought by the petitioner has already been granted vide order dated 20th September, 2013 passed in O.A. No. 363/2013- Rfn Prakash Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors. As a matter of fact, the respondents have also issued consequential order in pursuance to the direction passed by this Court on 20th September, 2013. In view of this, nothing survives in the matter. The petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs....
icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Dina Bhansali and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.A. 888/2011 % Judgment delivered on:02. d December, 2013 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Adv. Versus DINA BHANSALI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi and Mr. Jitendra Tripathi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 27.04.2011, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.11,26,635/-.2. The aforesaid compensation has been apportioned between the claimants as under:1.2. 3. Smt. Dina Bhansali Mr. Rishab Bhansali : : Rs.6,26,635/Rs.5,00,000/- Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that the case of the claimants before the ld. Tribunal was that Sh. Vinod Bhansali, resident of 25-D, Janta Flats, Ashok Vihar, Phase-III, Delhi died in a road accident on 06.09.2010. At that time he was earning Rs.25,000/- to Rs.30,000/- per month, how...
Priyanka Nagpal Vs. University of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:02. 12.2013 WP(C) No.5394 of 2012 RISHABH MALHOTRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nitish Kumar, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.5400 of 2012 PUSHPENDER Through: ..... Petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7608 of 2012 SHILPA DAS & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7633 of 2012 SUPREEM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7904 of 2012 PRIYANKA NAGPAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Moh...
Ravinder Singh and ors. Vs. Bigur Finance Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :8. h OCTOBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :2. d DECEMBER, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 838/2013 & CRL.M.A. 2711/2013 RAVINDER SINGH & ORS. .... Petitioners Through : Mr.Jasmeet Singh, Advocate. versus BIGUR FINANCE LTD. .Respondent Through : Mr.Khalid Arshad, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of the summoning order dated 10.12.2012 and consequent proceedings in Complaint Case No.422/2001. The petition is contested by the respondents. Counsel for the petitioners urged that they had paid ` 52,65,000/- to the respondent by way of six drafts after settlement of all their disputes. Petitioner No.1 (Ravinder Singh) had instituted a suit being CS(OS) No.343/2012 against Paramjit Singh, Director of the respondent to claim ` 50,55,000/- paid in excess. After a series of negotiation, the parties arrived at figure ` 52,65,000/- on the basis of various fact...
Prakash Chand Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.233/2009 PRAKASH CHAND Through : .....Appellant Mr.D.B.Goswami, Adv. versus STATE Through: % ..... Respondent Mr.Narender Chaudhary, APP for the State. Pronounced on :December 02, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J1 Its all very well to paint justice blind, but she does better without a bandage round her eyes. She should be blind indeed to favour or prejudice, but clear to see which way lies the truth (Lord Denning in Jones v. National Coal Board (1957) 2 QB55 2. It is often quoted that every trial is voyage of discovery in which truth is quest. In our quest to ascertain the truth, we prefer to be guided by the following observation made by the Supreme Court in Chandra Shashi v. Anil Kumar Verma (1995) 1 SCC421 To enable the courts to ward off unjustified interference in their working, those who indulge in immoral acts like perjury, prevarication and motivated falsehoods hav...
Chandra Kant Vs. University of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:02. 12.2013 WP(C) No.5394 of 2012 RISHABH MALHOTRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nitish Kumar, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.5400 of 2012 PUSHPENDER Through: ..... Petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7608 of 2012 SHILPA DAS & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7633 of 2012 SUPREEM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. + WP(C) No.7904 of 2012 PRIYANKA NAGPAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini & Ms. Seema Salwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Moh...
Deep Chand Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : November 19, 2013 DECIDED ON : December 02, 2013 + CRL.A. 433/2001 DEEP CHAND ..... Appellant Through : Mr.R.Ramachandran, Advocate. VERSUS STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Deep Chand (the appellant) and Harish were arrested in Case FIR No.189/1998 under Section 308/34 IPC registered at Police Station Najafgarh and sent for trial on the allegations that on 28.04.1998 at 02.00 P.M. near Park at Chawla Bus Stand, Najafgarh, they inflicted injuries to Umesh. The police machinery came into motion when Daily Diary (DD) No.63-B (Ex.PW-6/1) was recorded at 04.45 P.M. on getting information from duty Ct.Sunil Kumar at Safdarjang hospital about the admission of Umesh Kumar by his brother Dalip in injured condition. The investigation was assigned to HC Shyambir who with Ct.Baljit went to the hospital and moved an application (Ex.PW4/1) seeking permission to...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »