Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Co. Ltd . Vs. Sh. Aman Kapur and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:3. d December, 2013 % + MAC.A. No.693/2006 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD . Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate. Versus SH. AMAN KAPUR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The appellant/Insurance Company has assailed the impugned award dated 07.04.2006, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation as under:Loss of income (2500 x 12 x 17 x1) Medical expense Expense on attendant Pain & sufferings Loss of amenity of life Future treatment Special diet & conveyance TOTAL (rounded off) Rs.5,10,000/Rs.3,48,049/Rs.25,000/Rs.25,000/Rs.25,000/Rs.50,000/Rs.20,000/Rs.10,03,049/Rs.10,03,000/- Interest at the rate of 5.5% per annum was also awarded from the date of filing of the petition till its realization.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company has argued the prese...
Jor Singh Vs. Sanjeev Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: December 03, 2013 RC.REV. 134/2013, C.M. Nos.7122/2013 & 7123/2013 JOR SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Ajay Kohli, Adv. with Ms.Sarvodaya Lakshmi, Adv. versus SANJEEV SHARMA Through ..... Respondent Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.C.M.Goyal & Mr.Anshumaan Sahni, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 25 B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the eviction order dated 8th July, 2012 passed by the Rent Controller (South), Saket Courts, Delhi in favour of the respondent.2. The respondent had filed an eviction petition against the petitioner in respect of one shop situated on the ground floor of the premises bearing No.C-6, Krishna Park, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted shop) on the ground of bonafide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act. It was contended ...
Rajiv Khosla Vs. Delhi High Court Bar Association and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 12.2013 FAO (OS) No.525/2013 & CM Nos.18175-78/2013 RAJIV KHOSLA Appellant versus DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & OTHERS Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Rajiv Khosla (Appellant-in-person) For the Respondents : Mr A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr J.P. Sengh, Sr Advocate, Mr Mohit Mathur, Mr Gurpreet S. Parwanda, Mr Vidit Gupta, Ms Yamini Khurana, Mr Vishnu Kant, Ms Harleen Singh, Mr Sumit Batra and Ms Ankita Gupta CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J1 This appeal has been filed against the order dated 13.11.2013 passed by a learned single Judge of this court in IA No.17828/2013 in CS(OS) 2149/2013. The learned single Judge has essentially taken the same view in the impugned order which he took while dealing with IA No.17553/2013 in CS(OS) 2111/2013 entitled Delhi Bar Association & Others v. Delhi High Court Bar Ass...
Dr. Mahendra Singh Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d December, 2013. % + RFA2692011 STATE FARMS CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ANR. ...... Appellants Through: Mr. G. Joshi, Adv. Versus DR. MAHENDRA SINGH Through: .....Respondent Respondent in person. AND + RFA3712011 DR. MAHENDRA SINGH Through: .....Appellant Appellant in person. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Joshi, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. Both appeals impugn the judgment and decree dated 03.02.2011 of the Court of Additional District Judge-07, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS No.118/2008 (ID No.02401C5086002004) filed by the appellant in RFA No.371/2011 against the appellants in RFA No.269/2011. RFAs No.269/2011 & 371/2011 No.269/2011 filed by the judgment debtors in the suit was admitted for hearing and vide order dated 12.05.2011 the operation of the impugned judgment and decree stayed. RFA No.371/2011 was also admitted for hearing on 25...
Kiran Babbar and ors Vs. Sh. Aurobindo College (Eve.) and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of Decision:03. 12.2013 W.P.(C) 7193/2012 KIRAN BABBAR AND ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Yogesh Kumar, Adv. Versus SH. AUROBINDO COLLEGE (EVE.) AND ANR ... Respondent Through: Mr Rajender Dhawan, Adv for R-1 Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv for Delhi University W.P.(C) 7536/2012 PAYAL PAUL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr Raj Kapoor, Adv. versus SRI AUROBINDO COLLEGE EVE. AND AN ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajender Dhawan, Adv for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioners before this Court applied for admission to the undergraduate courses in the University of Delhi, in the academic year 2012-2013. In terms of the procedure adopted by the University, the candidates were required to fill up an OMR form, which was to be deposited at the designated centres of the University. The candidates submitting the OMR form were required to bring one photocopy of the said form. The person receiving the ...
Deepak Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :12. h NOVEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :03. d DECEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 149/2000 DEEPAK Through : ....Appellant Mr.Nitin Dahiya, Advocate. versus .Respondent STATE Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Deepak impugns a judgment dated 25.01.2000 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.10/98 arising out of FIR No.95/97 PS Model Town whereby he was convicted under Sections 307, 394 reach with Section 397 IPC and by an order dated 27.01.2000, awarded RI for seven years with fine ` 10,000/- under Section 307 IPC; RI for seven years with fine ` 10,000/- under Section 397 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. The case of the prosecution as projected in the charge-sheet was that on 28.01.1997 at about 08.15 A.M. at B-412, Lal Bagh, Aakash Tailors, GTK Road, Delhi, Deepak and his companion Pankaj in furtherance of common intention inflicted injuries to Man Singh by a knife and ...
Sharat Shekhar Tomar Vs. Jamia Millia Islamia University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:03. 12.2013 + WP(C) No.7521 of 2013 & CM No.16087 of 2013 (Directions) SHARAT SHEKHAR TOMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajit Upadhyay & Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Advs. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, Ms. Jaya Goyal & Mr. Rohit, Advs. + WP(C) No.7548 of 2013 & CM Nos.16143 of 2013 (Directions) & 16144 of 2013 (Exemption) PULKIT CHOUDHARY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.A. Niyazi & Mr. Sanjay Sood, Advs. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, Ms. Jaya Goyal & Mr. Rohit, Advs. + WP(C) No.7639 of 2013 & CM No.16289 of 2013 (Directions) AMANDEEP KADIAN & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. V.K. Jain, Adv. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, Ms. Jaya Goyal & Mr. Rohit, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioners before th...
Shitij Khurana Vs. Shreha Khurana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: December 03, 2013 + MAT.APP. 31/2013 SHITIJ KHURANA Through ..... Appellant Mr.Arvind Nayar, Adv. with Mr.Zeyaul Haque & Ms.Nanda Devi, Advs. versus SHREHA KHURANA Through ..... Respondent Mr.C.L.Sahu, Adv. with Mr.Rajendra Sahu, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 151 CPC against the judgment and decree dated 7 th October 2013 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Tis Harzari Courts, Delhi 2. Brief facts leading to filing of the present appeal are that the respondent had filed a petition for annulment of marriage between the appellant and the respondent under Section 12 of the Act.3. As per the case of the respondent, as set out in the petition, the respondent was known to the appellant and his family since her childhood as the m...
Pulkit Choudhary Vs. Jamia Millia Islamia University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:03. 12.2013 + WP(C) No.7521 of 2013 & CM No.16087 of 2013 (Directions) SHARAT SHEKHAR TOMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajit Upadhyay & Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Advs. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, Ms. Jaya Goyal & Mr. Rohit, Advs. + WP(C) No.7548 of 2013 & CM Nos.16143 of 2013 (Directions) & 16144 of 2013 (Exemption) PULKIT CHOUDHARY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.A. Niyazi & Mr. Sanjay Sood, Advs. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, Ms. Jaya Goyal & Mr. Rohit, Advs. + WP(C) No.7639 of 2013 & CM No.16289 of 2013 (Directions) AMANDEEP KADIAN & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. V.K. Jain, Adv. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, Ms. Jaya Goyal & Mr. Rohit, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioners before th...
Mukesh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:03. d DECEMBER, 2013 + BAIL APPLN. 1420/2013 MUKESH Through .... Petitioner Mr. Faisal Naseem, Advocate versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State, with SI Sushma Saxena, P.S Sunlight Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is an application u/s 439 Cr.P.C moved by the petitioner for regular bail in case FIR No.406/2012 u/s 376/328 IPC, P.S. Sun Light Colony.2. It is the case of prosecution that petitioner was the neighbour of the prosecutrix and was known to her for the past two years. They used to visit each other. It is alleged that the petitioner had called the prosecutrix to his house for curing her stomach pain; prosecutrix went to his house and was told that there was a stone in her stomach. He asked her to lie down and said that he knew how to remove the stone from her stomach. Then he blindfolded the prosecutrix and gave her something to drin...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »