Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kishan Singh Rawat Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
$~ R-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 7/2006 % Judgment dated 5.12.2013 KISHAN SINGH RAWAT ..... Appellant Through: Mr.G.S.Sharma, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. The appellant has assailed the judgment dated 7.12.2005 and the order on sentence dated 8.12.2005 by which the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Sections 7, 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act; and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and pay fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine further simple imprisonment for a period of two months, under section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act; and also undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- under section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and default of payment of ...
Ndmc Avam Karamchari Bachao Morcha Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council, Th ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J): 1. Heard, Shri S.C. Jindal for the applicant and Mrs. Jyoti Singh, learned senior counsel for the respondents on the issue of maintainability of the present T.A. 2. The applicant, NDMC Avam Karamchari Bachao Morcha, a Registered Union of employees of NDMC under the Indian Trade Unions Act, 1926, through its General Secretary, originally filed the Writ Petition (C) No.5244/2013 before the Honble High Court of Delhi seeking the following reliefs: (a) To issue a Writ of Quo Warranto holding that the extension of Respondent No.4 as Advisor (Revenue) and Advisor (Legal) NDMC is illegal and void under the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 and instructions of the Government issued from time to time and the post be filled up by Respondent No.1 in accordance with law. To set up an independent enquiry into the alleged illegality and conspiracy made by Respondents with other officials of NDMC who are giving extension after extension to Respondent No.4 in violation o...
Lt Col Anuj Srivastava Vs. Uoi and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
The grievance of the petitioner is that after completion of his technical qualification, he was required to be granted Technical Allowance (Tier II). The petitioners case was rejected on number of occasions by the PCDA(O). His contention was that he is entitled to Technical Allowance after completion of his technical qualification. The respondents have produced a communication dated 20th September, 2013 issued by the Dte Gen of Mil Trg (MT-10) GS Branch, Integrated HQ of MoD (Army), New Delhi. In view of the para-3 of the said communication, the plea of the petitioner has been accepted and it has been directed that the petitioner shall be entitled to the Technical Allowance from the date he has acquired the technical qualification. In view of this, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. The petition is disposed off in terms of the aforesaid communication dated 20th September, 2013 and it is directed that the petitioner shall be paid the Technical Allowance from the date he h...
Payal Paul and ors Vs. Sri Aurobindo College Eve. and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of Decision:03. 12.2013 W.P.(C) 7193/2012 KIRAN BABBAR AND ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Yogesh Kumar, Adv. Versus SH. AUROBINDO COLLEGE (EVE.) AND ANR ... Respondent Through: Mr Rajender Dhawan, Adv for R-1 Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv for Delhi University W.P.(C) 7536/2012 PAYAL PAUL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr Raj Kapoor, Adv. versus SRI AUROBINDO COLLEGE EVE. AND AN ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajender Dhawan, Adv for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioners before this Court applied for admission to the undergraduate courses in the University of Delhi, in the academic year 2012-2013. In terms of the procedure adopted by the University, the candidates were required to fill up an OMR form, which was to be deposited at the designated centres of the University. The candidates submitting the OMR form were required to bring one photocopy of the said form. The person receiving the ...
Sardar Gurmukh Singh Vs. Govt.of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:03. 12.2013 + WP(C) No.4994 of 2012 SARDAR GURMUKH SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi, Ms. Anjali Chaturvedi, Advs. versus GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Nishant Pratap for Mr Parvinder Chauhan, Adv. for R-2 Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani with Ms. Bandana Shukla, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court claims to be a victim of 1984 riots which took place in Delhi. According to the petitioner, his house bearing number 211, K-1/17 was set on fire and his shop was destroyed by the rioters. DD No.9A dated 1.11.1984 is alleged to have been lodged in this regard at Police Station Mangolpuri. On 3.6.1990, the petitioner was paid Rs.4,000/- as monetary relief. On 17.10.2006, the petitioner was again paid a sum of Rs.36,000/- as monetary relief for damage of property and goods etc. It appears that the petitioner also applied for al...
Dilip Nigam Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:3. d DECEMBER, 2013 BAIL APPLN. 2117/2013 DILIP NIGAM Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajiv K. Garg, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State. Mr. R.C. Pathak, Advocate for R-2/ complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.Crl. M.A. 17114/2013 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 2117/2013 1. This is an application under Section 438 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.228/2013 registered at Police Station Roop Nagar under Sections 354A/506 IPC.2. The FIR was registered on the complaint of prosecutrix wherein it has been alleged that she had worked as a part time data entry operator and accountant in the year 2009 with Dilip Nigam. In May, 2012 Dilip Nigam approached her mother at her house in Kamla Nagar and urged for a...
M/S Swastik Polyvinyls (P) Ltd. Vs. B M Gupta and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:3. d DECEMBER, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2726/2013 M/S SWASTIK POLYVINYLS (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ashok Bhalla, Advocate versus B M GUPTA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Rajan Prasadam, Advocate WITH + CRL.M.C. 2730/2013 M/S SWASTIK POLYVINYLS (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ashok Bhalla, Advocate versus B M GUPTA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Rajan Prasadam, Advocate AND + CRL.M.C. 2731/2013 M/S SWASTIK POLYVINYLS (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ashok Bhalla, Advocate versus B M GUPTA & ORS. Through CRL.M.Cs. 2726/2013 and 2730-31/2013 ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Three criminal miscellaneous petitions bearing Nos. Crl. M.C. Nos. 2726/2013, 2730/2013 and 2731/2013 under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 have been filed for quashing the order dated 10th April, 2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge where...
Mr. Mahmood Kasim Sahib Vs. Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3436/2000 3rd December, 2013 % MR. MAHMOOD KASIM SAHIB Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Prem Prakash, Advocate with petitioner in person. Versus INDIAN RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. AND ANR. Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA Respondents To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner, who was an employee of the respondent No.1/Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. (IRCON), by this writ petition, prays for three reliefs. First is for setting aside of the order of the disciplinary authority dated 15.5.1995 by which petitioner was imposed the penalty of reduction of pay by three stages. The second relief which is prayed for setting aside of the order of the disciplinary authority dated 27.11.1998 imposing the punishment of removal from services upon the petitioner. The third relief which is claimed is that since petitioner has allegedly received less pay, the difference being unpaid amount o...
Amandeep Kadian and anr. Vs. Jamia Millia Islamia University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:03. 12.2013 + WP(C) No.7521 of 2013 & CM No.16087 of 2013 (Directions) SHARAT SHEKHAR TOMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajit Upadhyay & Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Advs. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, Ms. Jaya Goyal & Mr. Rohit, Advs. + WP(C) No.7548 of 2013 & CM Nos.16143 of 2013 (Directions) & 16144 of 2013 (Exemption) PULKIT CHOUDHARY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.A. Niyazi & Mr. Sanjay Sood, Advs. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, Ms. Jaya Goyal & Mr. Rohit, Advs. + WP(C) No.7639 of 2013 & CM No.16289 of 2013 (Directions) AMANDEEP KADIAN & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. V.K. Jain, Adv. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, Ms. Jaya Goyal & Mr. Rohit, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioners before th...
Delhi Bar Association and Others Vs. Delhi High Court Bar Association ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 12.2013 FAO (OS) No.510/2013 DELHI BAR ASSOCIATION & OTHERS Appellants versus DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ANOTHER Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants : Mr R.K. Sharma with Mr Rajiv Khosla, Ms Harshit Jain, Ms Daisy, Ms Preeti Bhardwaj, Ms Anshul Gupta and Mr A.K. Roy For the Respondents : Mr A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr J.P. Sengh, Sr Advocate, Mr Mohit Mathur, Mr Gurpreet S. Parwanda, Mr Vidit Gupta, Ms Yamini Khurana, Mr Vishnu Kant, Ms Harleen Singh, Mr Sumit Batra and Ms Ankita Gupta CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J1 This appeal is directed against the order dated 31.10.2013 passed by a learned single Judge of this court in CS(OS) 2111/2013 and IA No.17553/2013. The suit was filed by 8 plaintiffs. Plaintiff Nos. 1 to 6 were the Delhi Bar Association, the New Delhi Bar Association, Rohini Court Bar Associat...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »