Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Police Vs. Raj Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
$~2 to 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: December 05, 2013 W.P.(C) 4304/2013 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus PREM SINGH CHOUDHARY ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Anil Singal, Advocate W.P.(C) 4308/2013 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus RAJ KUMAR Represented by: ..... Respondent None W.P.(C) 4315/2013 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus SHIV SINGH Represented by: W.P.(C) No.4304/2013 & conn.matters ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 4939/2013 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus DEEPA TOMAR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral...
Sh. Salim Lalvani Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d November, 2013 Pronounced on:05. h December, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8095/2012 SH. SALIM LALVANI Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Vijay Kaundal Adv. with Mr. Rupesh Gupta, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .... Respondent Through Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. The short question falling for determination in the instant writ petition is whether on account of any dispute between the legal heirs of a deceased, who was a lease holder of a DDA plot and a third person, the DDA can withhold mutation in favour of the legal heirs or make it subject to the outcome of any such dispute.2. Let me recapitulate the facts.3. Late Shri Parmanand Jhuromal Lalvani (PJL), father of the Petitioner was the highest bidder of Plot No.149, Block A-I, in the layout plan of Safdarjung Development Residential Scheme, situated at Ring Road South Delhi. Said PJL was allotted the earlier said plot and a ...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Harish Chander Aggarwal (Through L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h December, 2013. + RFA1042008 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. Versus HARISH CHANDER AGGARWAL (THROUGH LRS) ......Respondent Through: Mr. P.S. Bindra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 10 th December, 2007 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ) in Suit No.128/2006 filed by the respondent, decreeing the suit of the respondent/plaintiff in the sum of Rs.2,66,400/- on account of arrears of rent and in the sum of Rs.9,80,000/- as mesne profits/damages for uses and occupational charges for the period from 1st July, 2006 to 8th July, 2007 with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of institution till realization and costs against the appellant/defendant.2. It Notice of the appeal was issued, though no stay of execution granted. appears RFA No.104/2008 that the decretal amount was recove...
Mmtc Ltd. Vs. Raj Rani Gulati (Deceased) Through Lrs and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h December, 2013 % + RFA842010 MMTC LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rohit Puri, Adv. Versus RAJ RANI GULATI (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.P. Gairola, Adv. for Mr. D.S. Chauhan, Adv. for LRs of R-1. Mr. J.S. Bakshi & Mr. A.S. Bakshi, Advs. for LRs of R-2. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 10.11.2009 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ) (Central District), Delhi in suit No.182/2009 filed by the deceased respondent No.1 / plaintiff against the appellant and against the respondents No.2 to 4 viz. Sh. L.C. Madan, Smt. Veena Chanana & Smt. Shashi Madan and thereby declaring as null and void the Mortgage Deed and No Objection Certificate (NOC) allegedly executed by the deceased respondent No.1 / plaintiff pertaining to property No.M-1/3C, Model Town-III, Delhi in favour of the appellant and directing the...
Teen Murti Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. M/S Nirmal Textiles (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5th December, 2013 % + RFA542004 TEEN MURTI CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Sarbjit Sharma & Ms. Arpita Bhalla, Advs. Versus M/S NIRMAL TEXTILES (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.S. Saluja, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 26.08.2003 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi in Suit No.530/2002 filed by the appellant / plaintiff and in counterclaim (which appears not to have been numbered) filed by the respondent / defendant and whereby, while the suit of the appellant / plaintiff was dismissed, the counterclaim of the respondent / defendant for recovery of Rs.5,96,840/- with interest was decreed against the appellant / plaintiff.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and subject to deposit of decretal amount in this Court, execution was stayed. A sum of Rs.7,25,160/- is reported to have been deposited by t...
Pradeep Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on September 18, 2013 Judgment Delivered on December 05, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6636/2011 PRADEEP ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sanjay Ghose and Mohd. Farrubh, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Represented by: + ..... Respondents Ms.Sweety Manchanda, CGSC with Ms.Shruti Aggarwal and Mr.Kartikey Mahajan, Advocates W.P.(C) 2041/2012 RANVEER SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajender Yadav, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.S.M.Arif, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The aforesaid two writ petitions involve identical issue and with the consent of counsel for the parties, are being disposed of by this common order.2. In the month of February, 2011, an advertisement was issued by the respondent No.2 Staff Selection Commission (SSC) inviting applications for recruitment to the post of Constables (GD) in the C...
Commissioner of Police Vs. Shiv Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
$~2 to 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: December 05, 2013 W.P.(C) 4304/2013 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus PREM SINGH CHOUDHARY ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Anil Singal, Advocate W.P.(C) 4308/2013 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus RAJ KUMAR Represented by: ..... Respondent None W.P.(C) 4315/2013 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus SHIV SINGH Represented by: W.P.(C) No.4304/2013 & conn.matters ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 4939/2013 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus DEEPA TOMAR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral...
Sh. Prithvi Chand Sharma Vs. M.T.N.L. and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:05. 12.2013 + W.P.(C) 4677/2012 SH. PRITHVI CHAND SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Anil Kumar, Adv. versus M.T.N.L. AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajeev Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner is the subscriber of the MTNL Telephone No.7520386, which was installed at his residence. The petitioner received a bill of Rs 35,297/- for the billing cycle dated 01.11.1995 followed by bill of the cycle dated 01.01.1996 for Rs 89,702/-. According to the petitioner, he protested against the aforesaid billing and wrote a letter dated 09.01.1996 to SDO (Telephones), Idgah Exchange, Delhi, seeking disconnection of STD facility. The petitioner also sought details of the calls made by him from 16.08.1995 to 15.12.1995. This was followed by a bill for the billing cycle dated 01.03.1996 for Rs.26,820/-. Since no relief was given to the petitioner, despite his having made various c...
Seven Heaven Buildcons P.Ltd. and anr. Vs. D.D.A. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. t October, 2013 Pronounced on:05. h December, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8523/2008 SEVEN HEAVEN BUILDCONS P.LTD. & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Anil K. Aggarwal with Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocates versus D.D.A. & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for Respondent No.1/DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. By virtue of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners seek refund of the earnest money of `64,21,000/along with interest.2. The facts of this case are not in very much dispute. By an advertisement dated 21.03.2008, the DDA invited tenders in respect of 170 freehold build-up shops/offices in a prime location of Delhi. Petitioner No.1 submitted a tender in respect of a unit situated at LSC, Vikas Puri, BlockC, Ground Floor. The Petitioners offer of `2,56,84,000/- being the highest was accepted. Consequently, 25% of the bid amount towards earnest mo...
Commissioner of Police Vs. Prem Singh Choudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
$~2 to 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: December 05, 2013 W.P.(C) 4304/2013 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus PREM SINGH CHOUDHARY ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Anil Singal, Advocate W.P.(C) 4308/2013 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus RAJ KUMAR Represented by: ..... Respondent None W.P.(C) 4315/2013 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus SHIV SINGH Represented by: W.P.(C) No.4304/2013 & conn.matters ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 4939/2013 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus DEEPA TOMAR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »