Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Mam Chand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on October 31, 2013 Judgment Delivered on December 06, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7692/2012 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Anand Nandan, Adv. versus MAM CHAND ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Anil Mittal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) is to the order dated August 14, 2012 in O.A.No.3676/2011 whereby the Tribunal has allowed the O.A. filed by the respondent herein by quashing the orders of the disciplinary authority as well as Appellate Authority and remanded the matter to the disciplinary authority to pass appropriate orders with respect to penalty holding the penalty of removal to be disproportionate; pending that the respondent was directed to be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits except back wages.2. The respondent joined DTC as a F...
Sparsh Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Maharishi Ayurveda Products Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :08. 08.2013 Judgment Pronounced on:06. 12.2013 + CS(OS) 84/2009 SPARSH BUILDERS PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Sunil Agarwal and Ms.Ruchi Jain and Mr.Noor Anand, Advs. versus MAHARISHI AYURVEDA PRODUCTS PVT. LTD...... Defendant Through Mr.V.P.Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.M.L.Bhargava, Ms.Latika Kohli and Mr.Abhishek Swarup, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present suit is filed seeking a decree of possession, recovery of damages and permanent injunction pertaining to property No.A-14, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi admeasuring 4617.67 sq. yards. It is the contention of the plaintiff in the plaint that the said suit property was purchased from the defendant on payment of full sale consideration of Rs. 4 crores accompanied by transfer of symbolic possession and execution of alleged transfer documents including registere...
Sudhir Khanna Vs. Jugal Kishore Khanna (Deceased Through Lrs) and or
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h December, 2013. % + RFA4392008 SUDHIR KHANNA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. Versus JUGAL KISHORE KHANNA (DECEASED THROUGH LRS) AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pravir K. Jain & Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advs. AND + RFA4832008 JUGAL KISHORE KHANNA (DECEASED THROUGH LRS) AND ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Pravir K. Jain & Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advs. Versus SUDHIR KHANNA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. RFA No.439/2008 impugns the judgment and decree dated 28.07.2008 of dismissal of suit No.70/06/83 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi filed by the appellant Sh. Sudhir Khanna for partition of property bearing No.15-D, Kamla Nagar, Delhi. RFA No.483/2008 has been preferred by the respondent No.1 Sh. Jugal Kishore Khanna (since deceased) and respondent No.2 Sh. Man Mohan Khanna in ...
Anirudh Dhaumya and ors. Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :03. 12.2013 Judgment pronounced on :06. 12.2013 W.P.(C) 6948/2012 & CM No.18062/2012 (Stay) ASSOCIATION OF SELF FINANCING INSTITUTIONS..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Adv. for Mr. S.K. Dubey, Adv. for the Petitioner. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Administrative Officer, Department of Higher Education. Mr. Harsh Kaushik, Adv. for R-2. + W.P.(C) 7734/2012; CM Nos.19516/2012 (Stay), 303/2013 (for modification of order dt. 11.12.2012) & 14277/2013 (Directions) ANIRUDH DHAUMYA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Davinder N. Grover, Adv. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Abhay Singh, Ms. Yasmin Zafar & Ms. Vindhya Singh, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.Section 6(1) of Delhi Professional Colleges ...
Ms/Srishti Gupta Vs. Amity University and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:06. 12.2013 + WP(C) No.7247 of 2012 &CM No.18688 of 2012 MS/SRISHTI GUPTA Through: ....Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini and Mr. Mayur Sharma, Advs. Versus AMITY UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr., Rajesh Yadav, Mr. Rajan Chawla, Mr. Kameshwar Nath Tripathi, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court is a student of respondent no.1 Amity University. The Attendance Rules of the University expect a student to have 100% attendance. The relaxation upto a maxium of 25%, however, can allowed by the Head of the Institution / Head of Department in a case of sickness or some other valid reasons beyond the control of the student. A student whose attendance is less than 75%, however, is not permitted to appear in the End- Semester Examination. In special circumstances, the Vice-Chancellor of the University can condone the attendance upto 5% below 75% on the recom...
Pawan Deep Singh Bahl Vs. Princep Supply Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
* + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.S (OS) No.1361/2002 Date of Decision:06. 12.2013 PAWAN DEEP SINGH BAHL Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. J.Sai Deepak with Mr. Maanav Kumar, Adv. versus PRINCEP SUPPLY AGENCY CF+ ..... Defendant Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. The plaintiff has filed this suit seeking reliefs of permanent injunction, restraining piracy of industrial design, infringement of copyright and passing-off, along with rendition of accounts of profits, delivery-up and damages with respect to Registered Industrial Design No.182353.2. The plaintiff is the sole proprietor of the trading firm, A. Paul Instruments (Delhi). The plaintiffs case is that he, either by himself or through his licensees and sister-concerns, is engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of rail thermometers and related equipment. The specific product of the plaintiff, which is the subject-matter of the instant suit is called Plug with Thermostat or Mercury in Glass Thermos...
Ganga Dhar Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. 12.2013 + CRL.REV.P. 695/2013, Crl.M.A.18331/2013 and Crl.M.B.2427/2013 GANGA DHAR Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Usha Saxena, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat with SI Yogendra, P.S. Gulabi Bagh. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SUNITA GUPTA, J.(Oral) 1. This is a criminal revision petition u/s 397 read with Section 401 and Section 482 Cr.P.C against the order dated 21.11.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment dated 06.08.2013 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate convicting the petitioner u/s 279/304A IPC and sentencing him to jail for a period of six months was dismissed.2. I have heard Ms. Usha Saxena, Advocate for the petitioner and have perused the record.3. As per the prosecution case, on 16.04.2004, information was received regarding an accident at P.S Gulabi Bagh vide D.D.No.12...
Abhay Kumar Mishra Vs. the State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 07, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: December 06, 2013 + CRL.M.C.3952/2012 & Crl.M.A. 18978/2012 ABHAY KUMAR MISHRA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Sunil K. Mittal and Mr. Kshitij Mittal, Advocates versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: ....Respondents Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for RespondentState with Inspector Nirmal Kumar Jha Ms. Rebecca M.John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikas Arora, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT On the application under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. preferred by second respondent, trial court vide impugned order 26th September, 2012 (Annexure-C) has directed registration of an FIR on the complaint (Annexure-B) of second respondent. In pursuance to the impugned order, FIR No.397/12 under Sections 195/409/420/467/468/470/471/ 477A/506/120-B of IPC was registered at P.S. Dabri, Delhi on 11th October, 2012. Quashing of impugned order (Annexure-C...
Kanwal Kishore Manchanda and anr. Vs. S.D.Technical Services Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S (O.S) No.1559/2003 Date of Decision:06. 12.2013 KANWAL KISHORE MANCHANDA AND ANR. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.P.S.Bindra, Adv. with Ms.Shweta Priyadarshini, Adv. versus S.D.TECHNICAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. F+ ..... Defendant Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed the instant suit for ejectment, mesne profits, damages and mandatory injunction directing the defendant to discharge all claims and demands of the Delhi Vidyut Board (for short the DVB) and its successor, BSES, in respect of ground floor of property bearing No.B-87, Maya Puri Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the suit property). The plaintiffs have also claimed damages to the tune of Rs. 20,00,500/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs and Five Hundred Only).2. The plaintiffs case is that, their father, Sh. Ram Prakash, granted a temporary license to the defendant vide license agreement dated February 25, 1983 in respect of...
Ram Sewak Gupta Vs. Sukhvir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 06, 2013 + RC. Rev. No.12/2013 RAM SEWAK GUPTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.K.P.Singh, Adv. versus SUKHVIR SINGH Through ..... Respondent Mr.K.L.Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.7394/2013 (for restoration) This is an application filed by the petitioner under Section 151 CPC for restoration of the abovementioned petition which was dismissed in default as also for non-prosecution vide order dated 26th April, 2013. Notice of this application was issued to the respondent who has filed his reply. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, as there is no delay in filing the present application. The petition is restored to its original position. The application is disposed of. RC. Rev. No.12/2013 & C.M. No.467/2013 (for stay) 1. Learned counsel for both the parties have also made their submissions on merits for some time.2. The petitioner (respo...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »