Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-ii) Vs. Goetze (India) Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL No.1179/2010 Reserved on:22. d October, 2013 Date of decision:9. h December, 2013 (Assessment Year 2000-01) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-II) ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Advocate. versus GOETZE (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Geetanjali Mohan and Ms. Mansi Gautam, Advocates. ITA No.1366/2010 (Assessment Year 2000-01) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-II) ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Advocate. versus FEDERAL-MOGUL GOETZE (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Geetanjali Mohan and Ms. Mansi Gautam, Advocates. + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.1979/2010 (Assessment Year 2001-02) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-II) ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Advocate. versus FEDERAL MOGUL GOETZE (INDIA) LIMITED ......Respondent Through Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Geetanjali Mohan and Ms. Mansi Gauta...
Ravi Kant and anr. Vs. Geeta Mishra and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2013 % + RFA232013 RAVI KANT & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Vivek Srivastava, Adv. versus GEETA MISHRA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 23rd July, 2012 of the Court of the Addl. District Judge (3) North, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Civil Suit No.107/08 (Unique Case ID No.02401C0421232006) filed by the respondent no.1, though dismissing the claim of the respondent no.1/plaintiff for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale of immovable property but directing the appellants and the respondents no.2 to 5 to refund/reimburse to the respondent no.1/plaintiff the amount of Rs.2 lacs paid by the respondent no.1/plaintiff at the time of execution of the Agreement to Sell along with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till realization.2. Notice of the appeal was i...
B.K.Pradhan Vs. Avtar Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 09, 2013 + RC.REV. 420/2012 BK PRADHAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr.K.K.Sharma, Sr.Adv. with Mr.G.K.Sharma, Adv. versus AVTAR KAUR ..... Respondent Through Mr.D.R.Bhatia, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner/landlord has filed the present petition under Section 25- B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 151 CPC against the order dated 28th July, 2012 passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller (East), Karkardooma Court, Delhi, in eviction petition, being E-55/2011, filed by the petitioner under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25-B of the Act.2. The brief facts of the case are that the property bearing No.383/2011, East Azad Nagar, Delhi-110051 (hereinafter referred to as the suit property) was originally purchased by the mother of the petitioner Smt.Gulab Devi by Sale Deed dated 21st April, 1972. The responden...
State Council of Educational Research and Training Vs. Harsh Vardhan a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: November 26, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: December 06, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2383/2013 STATE COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING & ORS. .....Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Tania Ahlawat, Advocate for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus HARSH VARDHAN & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.V.K.Bali, Sr.Advocate, Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Aditya Soni and Mr.K.D.Gupta, Advocates W.P.(C) 2506/2013 STATE COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING & ORS. .....Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Tania Ahlawat, Advocate for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus HARSH VARDHAN & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.V.K.Bali, Sr.Advocate, Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Aditya Soni and Mr.K.D.Gupta, Advocates Mr.Roshanl Lal Goel, Advocate for R-5 W.P.(C) 7349/2013 HARSH VARDHAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Represented by: Mr.V.K.Bali, Sr.Advocate, Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Aditya Soni and Mr.K.D.Gupta, Advocate...
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Mercury Electronics and anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.442 of 2013 Reserved on: October 29, 2013 Decision on: December 6, 2013 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL) .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. T.R. Andhyarujina, Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan and Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocates with Ms. Pratibha M. Singh, Ms. Saya Choudhary Kapur, Ms. Archana Sahdeva, Mr. Ashutosh Kumar and Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocates. versus MERCURY ELECTRONICS & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Sibal with Mr. Sunil Dalal, Mr. A.J.Sai Deepak, Mr. Maanav Kumar, Mr. Aditya Kutty, Mr. Rajiv Choudhary, Advocate for D-2. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0612.2013 IA No.15542 of 2013 (u/S151CPC) 1. This is an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (CPC) filed by the Plaintiff, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) [Ericsson]., seeking permission to file affidavits of Mr. Harish Sharma and Mr. Max Olofsson along with the claim chart mapping in a sealed envelope. The further prayers are that ...
Association of Self Financing Institutions Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :03. 12.2013 Judgment pronounced on :06. 12.2013 W.P.(C) 6948/2012 & CM No.18062/2012 (Stay) ASSOCIATION OF SELF FINANCING INSTITUTIONS..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Adv. for Mr. S.K. Dubey, Adv. for the Petitioner. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Administrative Officer, Department of Higher Education. Mr. Harsh Kaushik, Adv. for R-2. + W.P.(C) 7734/2012; CM Nos.19516/2012 (Stay), 303/2013 (for modification of order dt. 11.12.2012) & 14277/2013 (Directions) ANIRUDH DHAUMYA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Davinder N. Grover, Adv. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Abhay Singh, Ms. Yasmin Zafar & Ms. Vindhya Singh, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.Section 6(1) of Delhi Professional Colleges ...
Hdfc Bank Ltd. Vs. Prem Power Construction P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. No.63 of 2013 & Co. Appl Nos. 191-192 of 2013, 1049 of 2013, 1779 of 2013, 1785 of 2013 and Report No.696 of 2013 HDFC BANK LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Tandon with Ms. Nidhi Jain, Advocates. versus PREM POWER CONSTRUCTION P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Saurab Kirpal with Mr. A.P. Singh and Mr. Shyam Kumar, Advocates. Mr. Rupesh Goyal, proxy counsel for Mr. Ashish Makhija, Advocate for Official Liquidator. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0612.2013 CA No.2126 of 2013 (filed by the Respondent u/O9Companies Rules r/W Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) 1. This is an application filed by the Respondent, Prem Power Construction Private Limited (PPCL), under Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules (Company Rules), read with Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC and Section 151 of CPC for, inter alia, setting aside the ex parte interim order dated 15th February 2013 and the order dated 1st May 2013 passed by the Court.2. The background to this app...
Alpa Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Esi Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 12.2013 W.P.(C) 5844/2013 ALPA LABORATORIES LTD. ..... Petitioner versus ESI CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Adil Alvi. For the Respondent : Ms Rekha Palli & Ms Punam Singh. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, sought a writ order or direction for quashing the letter dated 17.06.2013 issued by the respondent, whereby the petitioner has been debarred from participating in future tenders for three years. The petitioner was, inter alia, supplying sterile water for injections under a Running Rate Contract. Clause 15(iii)(d) of that Running Rate Contract reads as under:15.(iii)(d) If Category A (major) defect is found, the firm will be debarred for three years for one or more or all the products in the Rate Contract of ESI Corporation....
Feroz Khan Vs. State (Nct Govt. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :5. h DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :6. h DECEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 550/1999 FEROZ KHAN ..... Appellant Through : versus Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate. STATE (NCT GOVT. OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.1. Feroz Khan and Sattar Khan were arrested in case FIR No.146/88 PS Defence Colony and sent for trial under Section 489B IPC on the allegations that on 05.08.1988 at about 01.00 P.M. at bus stop Sadiq Nagar, Madangir, they in furtherance of common intention attempted to use counterfeit Indian currency notes to the complainant Vinod Kumar. After completion of investigation, a charge-sheet was submitted and both the accused persons were duly charged and brought to trial. The prosecution examined seven witnesses to establish their guilt. In 313 statements, the accused persons denied their complicity in the crime and pleaded false implication. The trial resulted in convic...
Mahesh Singhal Vs. Bhupinder NaraIn Bhatnagar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :12. 11.2013 Judgment Pronounced on :06. 12.2013 + IA No.22691/2012 (u/S151 r/w O39 R4 CPC) in CS(OS) 354/2012 MAHESH SINGHAL Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Rajshekhar Rao and Mr. Anirudh Wadhwa, Advocates versus BHUPINDER NARAIN BHATNAGAR ..... Defendant Through Mr. Sanjay Katyal,Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.22691/2012 (u/S151 r/w O39R4CPC) 1. The plaintiff has filed the accompanying suit seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 08.08.2011. As per the plaint, the plaintiff entered into an agreement to sell with the defendant whereby the defendant agreed to sell property bearing No.213, Dayanand Vihar, Delhi110092 admeasuring 163 sq. yards for a total consideration of Rs.3.83crores. A sum of Rs. 10 lacs was paid as earnest money at the time of signing of the agreement to sell and purchase. It is averred in the plaint that the balance sale consideration of Rs. 3.73 cr...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »