Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar Raizada Vs. the Bank of Rajasthan and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :27. 08.2013 Decided on :09. 12.2013 CS(OS) 1730/2010 ASHOK KUMAR RAIZADA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate. versus THE BANK OF RAJASTHAN & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. S.K. Garg, Advocate for D-1. Mr. Rohit Verma, Advocate for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH CS (OS) No.1730/2010 1. On 8.5.2012, this Court had framed a preliminary issue which reads as under:1.Whether the civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the present suit on account of Section 34 of Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002?. OPD Arguments were heard on the said issue.2. The present Suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of declaration holding that the Sale Deeds dated 15.4.2005 and 29.6.2005 in favour of Late Chander Prakash Aggarwal deposited with defendant No.1/ICICI Bank Limited (previously The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd) and Punjab National Bank/defenda...
Suraj Prakash and ors. Vs. Ram Phal Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 09, 2013 + RC.REV. 388/2011 SURAJ PRAKASH AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Pradeep Mishra, Adv. versus RAM PHAL YADAV Through ..... Respondent Mr.Gaurav Kumar Singh, Adv. with Mr.Nagender Yadav, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present revision petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order dated 5th July, 2011 passed by ARC (Central), Delhi, dismissing the leave to defend application of the petitioners in respect of the shop bearing No.8649, Gali No.14 B, Shidi Pura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted premises).2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the present petition are that the respondent filed the eviction petition against the petitioners stating that he bonafidely requires the tenanted premises mainly, for his son, Nagendra Y...
international Institute of Telecom Technology Soci Vs. the Director Ge ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 13, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: December 09, 2013 + CRL.M.C.4385-87/2006 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TELECOM TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Sanjay Bhatt and Mr. Abhishek Anand, Advocates versus THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INVESTIGATION AND REGISTRATION ....Respondents Through: Mr. Baldev Malik and Mr. Rajan Malik, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT Petitioners are the Chairman and Honorary Secretary of International Institute of Telecom Technology Society (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner-Society) who are seeking quashing of criminal complaint under Section 49(1) of The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (Annexure P-11) in this petition.2. Petitioners assert that petitioner-Society is a non-profit educational society, who has established number of educational institutions with the approval of concerned authorities i.e. the AICTE, Punjab Technica...
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Ratan Lal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:9. h December, 2013 % + MAC.A. No.1114/2011 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Shantha Devi Raman and Mr.Sanjeet Ranjan, Advocates. Versus RATAN LAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sanjoy Kumar Ghosh, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Ms.Rupali S. Ghosh, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.CM. No.22332/2013 (for delay) In view of the averments made in the application, the delay in filing the instant appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. MAC.APP. 1114/2011 1. dated This appeal is directed against 25.05.2011, whereby the learned the impugned Tribunal has award awarded compensation as under:- (i) Medical expenses 4,50,013 (ii) Special Diet and travelling expense (iii) Loss of income and future earning (iv) Other non pecuniary damages 50,000 14,58,600 2,00,000 (Rs.1,00,000/- each on account of pain and suffering and future m...
Smt. Nita Abbot and ors. Vs. Smt. Gita Marwaha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 09, 2013 + CM(M) 579/2013 SMT NITA ABBOT & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.Vimal Goyal, Adv. versus SMT GITA MARWAHA Through ..... Respondent Mr.N.S.Negi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have assailed order dated 26 th April, 2013 passed by learned Trial Court in a suit for partition, declaration and injunction filed by the respondent (plaintiff therein) against the petitioners (defendants therein).2. When the matter was fixed for evidence of the petitioners before the learned Trial Court, petitioner No.1 sought an adjournment on the ground that her counsel had gone out of town for some religious ceremonies. The learned Trial Court vide the order dated 21 st October, 2011, closed the right of the petitioners for examination of the witneses.3. An application was moved by petitioner No....
North Delhi Power Ltd. Vs. M.C.D.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA26302005 NORTH DELHI POWER LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.B. Jain, Mr. Anupam Varma, Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Mr. Jibran Tak, Mr. Rahul and Mr. Sameer Abhyanker, Advocates versus M.C.D. Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Madhu Tewatia with Ms. Sidhi Arora and Ms. Adirath Singh, Advocates for MCD. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate for GNCT of Delhi Reserved on :11. h October, 2013 Date of Decision:09. h December, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present letters patent appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 25th July, 2005 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 3913/2004 titled as Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. North Delhi Power Limited.2. The primary issue that arises for consideration in the present appeal is whether the 8080 sq. mtrs. of vacant plot of land near sub-station Civil Lines Zone occupied by the appellant is ow...
Ajaj HussaIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
$~35. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 700/2013 % Judgment dated 09.12.2013 AJAJ HUSSAIN Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Ajit Sharma, Adv. (DHCLSC) versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. for State. SI Mehrab Alam, P.S. Shahdara. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A.18521/2013.1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A.18464/2013 3. This is an application filed by the petitioner for condonation of one and a half years delay in filing the present revision petition.4. Notice. Counsel for the State accepts notice and has no objection if the delay in filing the present revision petition is condoned.5. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the revision petition is condoned.6. Application stands disposed of. CRL.REV.P. 700/2013 7. Present revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 8.5.2013 passed by le...
C.S. Gera Vs. B.S.E.S Rajdhani Powr Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) Nos.7431/2013, 7432/2013, 7435/2013, 7438/2013 & 7442/2013 9th December, 2013 % 1. W.P.(C) No.7431/2013 C.S. GERA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vimal Wadhawan, Advocate. Versus B.S.E.S RAJDHANI POWR LIMITED Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate with Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate.2. W.P.(C) No.7432/2013 K.K. MOHLA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vimal Wadhawan, Advocate. Versus B.S.E.S RAJDHANI POWR LIMITED Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate with Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate.3. W.P.(C) No.7435/2013 R. K. BHASIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vimal Wadhawan, Advocate. Versus B.S.E.S RAJDHANI POWR LIMITED Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate with Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate.4. W.P.(C) No.7438/2013 AMAR NATH SACHDEVA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vimal Wadhawan, Advocate. Versus B.S.E.S RAJDHANI POWR LIMITED Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate with Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate.5. W.P.(C) No.7442/...
Smt.Krishna Kumari Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 21, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: December 09, 2013 + WP(C) No.3534/2012 SMT. KRISHNA KUMARI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.K.P.Gupta, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.K.A.Sorte, Deputy Education Officer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. A nepotistic administrative decision taken in the year 1984 by the then Director of Education, Delhi Administration became a fertile ground of litigation and hundreds of teachers had to fight over five hundred times, on various facets of the consequence of the nepotistic decision. Instant writ petition is one humble contribution to the over five hundred litigations we have just referred to.2. Pursuant to the vacancy year 1983-84, having notified 1492 posts of Trained Graduate Teachers (TGT) in various disciplines, for nepotistic reasons the then Director of Edu...
Laddan Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2013 Date of Decision:9. h December, 2013 % + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.898/2012 LADDAN Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J:1. The appellant-Laddan assails the impugned judgment dated 2 nd February, 2012 and order on sentence dated 4th February, 2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03 (NE), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in case FIR No.330/2007 under Sections 307/302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 IPC. Vide order on sentence dated 04.02.2012, he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous impris...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »