Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Wing Commander V. Gouripathi (Retd.) Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7759/2013 & CM No.16510/2013 Date of decision :10. h December, 2013 WING COMMANDER V. GOURIPATHI (RETD.) ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Inderjit Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC for R-1 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) CM No.16510/2013 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. WP (C) No.7759/2013 2. The petitioner in the instant case assails the order dated 20 th November, 2013 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.445/2013 praying for quashing of the PPO No.08/14/A/Rev./6384/2009 rejecting the representation of the petitioner.3. The petitioner in the instant case is an officer of the Indian Air Force serving in the Metrological Branch. The petitioners request for premature retirement was favourably considered by the respondents and he proceeded on such retirement w.e.f 30...
Anil Kumar @ Lala Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2013
$~21. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 10, 2013 + W.P.(CRL) 1555/2013 ANIL KUMAR @ LALA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.R.K. Bali, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Ms.Charu Dalal, Adv. for Mr.Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State. SI Rajender Dhaka, P.S. Rajouri Garden. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition is directed against the order of externment dated 27.9.2012 passed by Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police, District (West), Delhi, and the order dated 31.7.2013, passed by learned Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the order of externment dated 27.9.2012 was upheld.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by the impugned order of externment the petitioner was directed to remove himself beyond the limits of NCT of Delhi, for a period of one year w.e.f. 4.10.2012. The petitioner thereafter filed an app...
Ranjit and ors. Vs. Charan Kaur and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 10, 2013 + RC. REV. No.10/2011 & C.M. No.429/2011 RANJIT & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mr.R.S. Sharma, Adv. versus CHARAN KAUR & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr.M.L. Bajaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been contested by the petitioners under Section 25-B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 assailing the impugned order dated 18th November, 2010 passed by the court of SCJ/RC (West), Delhi in eviction petition No.E-37/2009.2. The respondents/landlord sought eviction of the petitioners/tenants alleging bonafide requirement of the tenanted property bearing No.2568, Gali Mandir Wali, Shadipur Khampur, Delhi. The petitioners on being served the summons of the eviction petition filed leave to defend application. The respondents herein filed reply to the application for leave to defend. The learned Addl. Rent Controller after hearing both the parties dismi...
Yashpal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2013
$~ R-25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 10, 2013 + CRL.A. 128/2005 YASHPAL Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Ruchi Kapoor, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Advocate for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Present appeal has been preferred under Section 374 Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 29.1.2005 and order on sentence dated 31.1.2005, by which the appellant, Yashpal was convicted and sentenced to pay fine of Rs.500/- under Section 186 IPC, in default thereof to undergo RI for 15 days; and to undergo RI for one year and pay fine of Rs.1000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for one month under Section 307 IPC. The appellant, Yashpal, was also sentenced to undergo one year RI under Section 27 of the Arms Act.2. Counsel for the appellant submits that the impugned order is contrary to facts, is against the law and has been passed without application of judicial mind and in ...
M/S Greenways Vs. Y.N. Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 09, 2013 + CM(M) No.719/2013 M/S GREENWAYS Through ..... Petitioner Mr.S.K.Puri, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Praveen Kumar, Adv. versus Y.N.GUPTA Through ..... Respondent Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Harpreet Singh & Mr.Rajesh Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.C.M. No.10941/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) No.719/2013 1. The petitioner (defendant in the suit) has filed the present petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India seeking to set aside the impugned order dated 18th May 2013 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge (Central) 08, Tis Hazari, Delhi, in the application filed by the respondent/plaintiff under Order XXIII, Rule 1 CPC in Suit No.149/10.2. The brief facts leading to the present petition are as follows: a) A suit for ejectment/possession, recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits was ...
Saurabh Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:9. h December, 2013 % + CM(M) No.1318/2013 SAURABH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Rajnish K. Jha, Advocate. Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Vatsala Rai for Mr.Rajiv Kapur, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against respondent State Bank of India to release the complete amount lying deposited with it in the form of FDR with upto date interest in his favour.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/injured met with an accident on 05.03.2011 at about 12.45 am at L-Block, Mangolpuri, Delhi, which also caused death of Abhimanyu @ Shanti by the offending vehicle, i.e., TSR bearing registration No.DL-14F-9631. Thereafter, the petitioner/ injured filed the claim petition before the learned Tribunal. On filing of the DAR (Detailed Accidental Report), the claim petition was disp...
Mam Raj and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :25. h September, 2013. DECIDED ON :9. h December, 2013 + CRL.A. 158/2002 MAM RAJ & ORS. Through : ....Appellants Mr.Jitin Sahni, Advocate versus STATE Through : .Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Mam Raj, Chet Ram, Rajinder, Rohtash, Natho and Usha were arrested and sent for trial for committing offences under Sections 147/148/149/307/448/506/34 IPC in case FIR No.380/1987 registered at Police Station Kingsway Camp on the allegations that on 17.10.1987, they all formed an unlawful assembly, the object of which was to inflict injuries to Nathu Singh, Ramesh, Shankar and Gulshan. Pursuant to said common object, on 17.10.1987 at about 08.15 P.M. at house No.B-222, Dakha Village, Kingsway Camp, they inflicted injuries to Nathu Singh by a pharsa in an attempt to murder him and voluntarily poured acid on the person of Shankar Dass, Gulshan Kumar and Ramesh besides criminally intimidating th...
Naresh Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 12.2013 + CRL.A. 448/1998 & Crl.M.A. No.6136/1998 NARESH KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.B.SRana, Mr.VijenderBhardwaj, Mr.Nitin Sharma, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this appeal filed underSection 374 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the appellant seeks to challenge the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 08.10.1998 and 09.10.1998, respectively, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, has convicted the appellant for committing an offence punishable under Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment together with fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six month...
i.P. Power Generation Company Ltd. Vs. Siddhartha Extension Resident W ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2013 % + RFA6312010, CM No.15713/2010 (for condonation of 88 days delay in refilling) & CM No.15714/2010 (for condonation of 22 days delay in filing the appeal). I.P. POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Dubey & Ms. Anandi Mishra, Advs. versus SIDDHARTHA EXTENSION RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS .... Respondents Through: Mr. L.K. Garg, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Manika Tripathy & Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik for, Adv. for DDA. Mr. R.G. Srivastava, Adv. for R-3. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 8 th October, 2009 of the Court of the Addl. District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi of dismissal of Suit No.745/08/01 filed by the predecessor-in-interest of the appellant, consequent to an order of rejection of plaint on an application by the respondent/defendant no.1 under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC.2. The appeal was accompa...
Ashok Kriplani Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:09. 12.2013 + WP(C) No.7711 of 2013 ASHOK KRIPLANI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Kriplani, petitioner in person versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC with Mr. Vikram Aditya Narayan, Advs. For R-1 UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court, who is an advocate, filed a complaint against one Dr. Jethwani alleging illegal medical practice by him thereby violating the provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act as well as the Indian Penal Code. This was followed by a complaint against the SHO before the Rajasthan State Human Rights Commission. The said complaint was sent to Deputy SP, Kota, for investigation, who recorded the statement of the petitioner and his wife. The Rajasthan State Human Rights Commission invited rejoinder/ comments of the petitioner on the discharge report submitted by the Deputy SP...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »