Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kumari Kajal Garg Vs. Bharti College and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:11. 12.2013 + WP(C) No.471 of 2013 & CM No.914 of 2013 KUMARI KAJAL GARG Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Adv. BHARTI COLLEGE AND ANR Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Adv. for R1 Mr. Mohinder Jeet Singh, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court was a student of B.Com.(Hons.) of respondent no.1 Bharti College. Vide communication dated 14.9.2012, the petitioner was required to present herself before the Inquiry Committee with regard to electoral malpractices reported by Smt. Shobhna Sinha. However, the copy of the report made by Smt. Shobhna Sinha was not annexed to the said communication. Vide response dated 18.9.2012, the petitioner requested the Principal of the college to provide inquiry documents to her before the meeting of the Inquiry Committee was held. Vide letter dated 18.9.2012, the Principal of the College infor...
Didi Manjeet Kaur Pavlicek Vs. Rekha Dagar and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
* 30. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.2204 of 2007 DIDI MANJEET KAUR PAVLICEK ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. A.S. Dateer, Advocate. versus REKHA DAGAR & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Advocate for D-2. Mr. Pallav Pandey, Advocate for D-1. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER1112.2013 1. Didi Manjeet Kaur has filed this suit against Smt. Rekha Dagar and Maa Gayatry Properties, Defendants 1 and 2 respectively seeking specific performance of an agreement-cum-receipt dated 22nd June 2007 whereby Defendant No.1 agreed to sell to the Plaintiff the property being MIG Flat No.96, Third Floor, Block-A-2, Sector-18, Rohini, Delhi-110085 shown in red in the site plan (hereafter suit property) in favour of the Plaintiff.2. The Plaintiff describes herself as an Indian born American citizen. She has filed this suit through her attorney Smt. Meena Rani, a resident of Rohini, Delhi. The Plaintiff states that Smt. Meena Rani is her maternal aunt and that she executed a...
Birender Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:11. 12.2013 WP(C) No.7836 of 2013 & CM No.16639 of 2013 (Stay) BIRENDER SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P. Aanand Naidu, Mr. Rabin Majumdar & Mr. D.K. Pradhan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC, Ms. Shruti Aggarwal & Mr. Rupender Pal Singh, Advs. along with Major Dhar, Ministry of Defence. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The son of the petitioner, namely, Harsh Yadav, is studying in Class V in a Central School and his date of birth is 21.4.2003. According to the petitioner, his son is quite keen to join Rashtriya Military School (for short RMS) so that he can enter Armed Forces through National Defence Academy (NDA) and has been making preparations for the entrance examination held by RMS for admission to the VI standard. Till the academic year 2013-2014, the children in the age bracket 10-12 years as on 1st...
Satyajit Chatterjee Vs. Deepa Chatterjee and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h December, 2013. + RFA2002012, CM No.7926/2012 (u/O41R-27 of the CPC), CM No.7927/2012 (for stay), CM No.15161/2012 (for vacation of stay) & CM No.14645/2013 (for stay of execution). SATYAJIT CHATTERJEE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Mehta & Mr. R.K. Mehta, Advs. Versus DEEPA CHATTERJEE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Choudhri, Ms. Shruti Choudhri & Mr. Anjan Sinha, Advs. AND + RFA3262012 DEEPA CHATTERJEE & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Choudhri, Ms. Shruti Choudhri & Mr. Anjan Sinha, Advs. Versus SATYAJEET CHATTERJEE .... Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Mehta & Mr. R.K. Mehta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. Both appeals impugn the judgment and decree dated 29 th September, 2011 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ)-03 (C), Delhi in Suit No.02/2009 (Unique Case I.D. No.02401C0091632003) filed by the appellants in RFA No.326/2012 against the ...
Beeru Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : December 11, 2013 + CRL.A. 1079/2010 BEERU Through ..... Appellant Avi Singh, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. One can visibly see the growth of the country in all spheres keeping a pace with the modernization, advancement, science and technology but unfortunately the only front which is on the decline is the moral values. In the recent past, the country has witnessed too many horrifying and heart rendering incidents of rapes and many of such cases were so brutal and barbaric, that they jolted the society to ponder whether such beastly acts can be committed by a human being on the other. Amongst such horrifying incidents, sexual assaults involving minor children are the worst and amongst the worst, the cases involving sexual ...
Dr. Kewal Krishna Sood Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1762/2013 Reserved on: Date of decision:21. 11.2013 11.12.2013 IN THE MATTER OF: DR. KEWAL KRISHNA SOOD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Pal Singh, Advocate versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP for the CBI with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocate CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.PC for grant of bail in case FIR No.RC.BD1/2009/E/0019 entitled CBI vs. Dr. Kewal Krishna Sood and Others registered under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B/34 IPC by the CBI at New Delhi.2. The allegations against the petitioner, who is the promoter of a company by the name of M/s Raghubir Hospital Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the hospital), are that he had dishonestly availed of a term loan of 6.50 crores from the State Bank of India (SBI), Commercial Branch, New Delhi for the purpose of setting up a 150 b...
National Investor Forum Vs. the Golden Forests (India) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :29. 8.2013 Decided on :11. 12.2013 + W.P.(C) No.1399/2010 NATIONAL INVESTOR FORUM ..... Petitioner Through : Counsel (appearance not given.) Versus THE GOLDEN FORESTS (INDIA) LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Harpawan Kumar Arora & Mr. Prashant Chauhan, Advocates for the Committee/GFIL in CM APPL.9657/13 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI CM No.9657/2013 (for confirmation of auction sale) 1. This is an application seeking confirmation of auction sale by the applicant/Committee, GFIL for two properties situated in Ambala. The applicant submits that advertisements were issued on 13.5.2013 inviting sealed bids for auction of three properties in Haryana: one in Panchkula district and two in Ambala district. The application seeks confirmation apropos the latter two i.e. (i) Property No.2: Agricultural Land measuring Approx.99 Kanal & 3 Marla situated in Village Dangd...
Vishal Grover and anr. Vs. O.P. Batra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
* 15. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.320 of 2011 VISHAL GROVER & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, Advocate for Plaintiffs/Applicants in IA Nos. 17385 of 2011, 17386 of 2011 & 18190 of 2011. versus O.P. BATRA ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Dinesh Garg with Ms. Surbhi Sharma, Advocates for proposed Defendant No.3. Mr. Jitendra Jain, Advocate for proposed Defendant Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER1112.2013 CS (OS) No.320 of 2011 & IA No.17385 of 2011 (under Order VI Rule 17 CPC), 17386 of 2011 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC), 18190 of 2011 (under Order I Rule 10 CPC) 1. Shri Vishal Grover and his brother Shri Neeraj Grover have filed the above suit seeking specific performance of a purported agreement to sell dated 24th October 2010 entered into by them with the Defendant Shri O.P. Batra in respect of the property at H-92/1, Shivaji Park, New Delhi110026 (the suit property). According to the Plaintiffs it had been agreed that the...
Balesh Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:11. h DECEMBER, 2013 BAIL APPLN. 2242/2013 BALESH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Atul Pandey, Advocate versus THE STATE Through ..... Respondent Ms. Asha Tiwari, APP Inspector R.K. Atri, ATO Badarpur Mr. V.K. Nayyar, ACP, PS Sarita Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. of This is an application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant anticipatory bail in case FIR No.385/2013 u/s 452/354/323/506/382/34 IPC & 3(I) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as SC/ST Act), registered with PS Badarpur.2. The case of the prosecution as revealed from the FIR is that Mithilesh lodged a complaint with police alleging, inter alia, that she is residing at house No.2936, Gali No.70, Block E-2, Molarband Extn. Badarpur, New Delhi along with her husband and three children. Balesh is residing in her neighbourhood with his family and belongs ...
Aman Grover Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
$~ 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 271/2005 % Judgment dated 11.12.2013 AMAN GROVER Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Raman Rai Handa, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. is to the judgment of the trial court dated 4.3.2005 and order on sentence dated 5.3.2005, whereby the appellant has been convicted to undergo RI for six months for the offence punishable under Section 411 IPC and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- in default of payment of fine SI for 15 days.2. Brief facts of the case as noticed by the trial court are that: On receipt of DD No.2A dated 2.11.03 SI. K.K. Mishra along with Baney Singh reached the place of occurrence where PCR Van Z71was present and its in-charge produced Complainant Ombir Singh before them. The said Ombir Singh stated that he works at an Export factory in Kirti Nagar and on ...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »