Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijender Kumar Aggarwal and Others Vs. Department of Forest and Wild L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.80 of 2012 Decided on :12. h December, 2013 VIJENDER KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS. Appellants Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal & Mr. Abhay Khuswah, Advocates. Versus DEPARTMENT OF FOREST & WILD LIFE & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. D. Rajeshwar Rao & Mr. Vikrant Kaushik, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Saqib, Advocate for R-2 & 3. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate for R-4/LAC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC against the order dated 27.1.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge in R.C.A. No.2/2010.2. On 27.11.2013, this court had expressed the prima facie view that the present regular second appeal is not maintainable. The learned counsel for the appellant had accordingly sought time to examine the issue, however, thereafter on the adjourned dates, another counsel appeared and sought time to argue the matter afresh and contend that the regular second appeal is maintainable.3. B...
K.R. Subbanna Vs. Delhi Kannada Senior Secondary School and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.1659/2013 12th December, 2013 % K.R. SUBBANNA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate. Versus DELHI KANNADA SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL AND ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Ginish Ananthmurthy, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate and Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner, who took voluntary retirement from the respondent no.1/school w.e.f 5.7.2012, seeks setting aside of the memorandum/charge-sheet dated 1.1.2013 and all proceedings emanating therefrom. Petitioner accordingly argues that since charge-sheet has to be quashed, he should be paid all the terminal and retiral benefits which have been withheld by the respondent no.1/school and which were withheld on account of the departmental proceedings. I may note that ...
J.S.Punia Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5749/2011 & CM No.12141/2013 % Reserved on:13. h November, 2013 Date of decision:12. h December, 2013 J.S.PUNIA Through : ..... Petitioner Col (Retd.) S.R. Kalkal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner impugning the order dated 7th July, 2011 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal in OA No.737/2010 rejecting the petitioners prayer for direction to the respondents to pay invalid pension to him with effect from the date of his release from service along with arrears and 12% interest thereon. The petitioner had also prayed that the respondents be directed to add the period of leave pending retirement (LPR) for 108 days with 12% interest thereon.2. The present case has a chequered history and is preceded by several litigations which would not only guide...
Alka Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Crest Export Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d September, 2013 Date of Decision:11. h December, 2013 % + CO. PET. 206/2010 & CA No.532/2012 ALKA EXIM PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Subhiksh Vasudev and Mr. Srivats Kausal, Advocates. versus M/S. CREST EXPORT PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vikram Dholakia, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is a petition filed by Alka Exim Pvt. Ltd. under Section 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking winding-up of the respondent-company for non-payment of `2,55,11,173/- which includes the principal amount of `2,18,43,881/- and interest of `36,67,292/-.2. The petitioner is a private limited company carrying on business in the supply of fabrics and allied items. The respondent-company was carrying on business in fabrication/ exports. The directors of the respondent-company used to purchase fabrics on credit from the petitioner-company....
Anil Kumar Vs. Staff Selection Commission (North Region) and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1571/2013 & CM Nos.2950-51/2013 Date of decision:11. h December, 2013 % ANIL KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik and Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Advs. versus STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION (NORTH REGION) AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Ravinder Aggarwal, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved for rejection of his candidature in the selection process undertaken by the Staff Selection Commission respondent no.1 herein pursuant to the advertisement dated 29th May, 2010 published in the employment newspaper/Rojgar Samachar whereby the respondents advertised 1000 vacancies for the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector (Exe) in the CISF.2. The petitioner had applied in the reserved category as an OBC from the State of Rajasthan and claims to possess the relevant certification in this regard. It is undisp...
Kuldeep Kumar Vs. Lt.Governor of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
$~ 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1275/2013 % Judgment dated 11.12.2013 KULDEEP KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Mir Akhtar Hussain, Advocate versus LT.GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Saleem Ahmed, ASC along with Ms.Charu Dalal, Advocate and S.I. Niranjan Kumar, P.S. Shadara. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. By the present petition, petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 24.7.2013 passed by respondent no.1 and order dated 27.6.2013 passed by respondent no.2.2. The order of externment dated 27.6.2013 passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police, North East District, Delhi for removal / externment of the petitioner beyond the limits of NCT of Delhi for a period of one year w.e.f. 4.7.2013 and the subsequent order passed in appeal dated 24.7.2013 confirming the order dated 27.6.2013 are the subject to challenge in the present writ petition.3. Counsel for the p...
Deepa Chatterjee and anr Vs. Satyajeet Chatterjee
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h December, 2013. + RFA2002012, CM No.7926/2012 (u/O41R-27 of the CPC), CM No.7927/2012 (for stay), CM No.15161/2012 (for vacation of stay) & CM No.14645/2013 (for stay of execution). SATYAJIT CHATTERJEE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Mehta & Mr. R.K. Mehta, Advs. Versus DEEPA CHATTERJEE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Choudhri, Ms. Shruti Choudhri & Mr. Anjan Sinha, Advs. AND + RFA3262012 DEEPA CHATTERJEE & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Choudhri, Ms. Shruti Choudhri & Mr. Anjan Sinha, Advs. Versus SATYAJEET CHATTERJEE .... Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Mehta & Mr. R.K. Mehta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. Both appeals impugn the judgment and decree dated 29 th September, 2011 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ)-03 (C), Delhi in Suit No.02/2009 (Unique Case I.D. No.02401C0091632003) filed by the appellants in RFA No.326/2012 against the ...
Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corpora Vs. Chander Shekh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h December, 2013. + RFA4572013 DELHI TOURISM & TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Sanad Jha, Advocates. Versus CHANDER SHEKHAR BHANDARI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. J.C. Mahindroo, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 2 nd April, 2013 of the District & Sessions Judge (North) in CS No.556/2010 filed by the respondent/plaintiff) of ejectment of the appellant/defendant from the ground floor of property No.C-76, Ramgarh, Jahangirpuri (stated to be wrongly written in para 19 of the judgment as Mangol Puri), Delhi and for recovery from the appellant/defendant of mesne profits at the rate of Rs.8,000/- per month compounded by 10% per annum with effect from 3 rd August, 2010 till the delivery of possession of the property.2. The appellant/defendant delivered the possession of the ...
Shakeela @ Baby and anr. Vs. Mehzabeen @ Zabeen
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h December, 2013 % + RFA3122013 &CM No.10328/2013 (for stay). SHAKEELA @ BABY & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Cheena Sharma & Mr. Yogesh Choudhary, Advs. versus MEHZABEEN @ ZABEEN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashwin Vaish & Mr. Vinod Kumar Pandey, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 13th February, 2013 of the Addl. District Judge (North), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Civil Suit No.159/2011 (Unique ID No.02401C0461372011) filed by the respondent) of declaration that the bayana receipt Ex.DW2/PX dated 23rd December, 2010 is null and void and for recovery of possession from the two appellants of the third floor of property bearing No.4035, Ward No.XIV, Basti Mansa Ram, Gali Barna, Sadar Bazar, Delhi and of permanent injunction restraining the appellants from creating third party interest in the property.2. Notice of the appeal was issue...
Shapoorji Pallonji Roads Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 12.2013 W.P.(C) 6984/2013 & CM No.15110/2013 SHAPOORJI PALLONJI ROADS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. versus .....Petitioners UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr N. K. Kaul, Sr. Advocate with Mr Akhil Sibal, Mr Aslam Ahmed, Mr Balbit Singh Jamwal and Mr Anoj Menon. For the Respondents : Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Ankur Chhibber for R-1 & 2. Mr Mukul Rohtagi and Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocates with Ms Diya Kapur, Mr S. Trehan, Ms Manjira Dasgupta and Mr Arjun S. Puri, for R-3 and 5. Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms Niti Dixit, Mr Vidur Bhatia and Ms Samiksha for R-4. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present writ petition challenging, inter alia, the decision of the Border Roads Organisation, respondent no.2 herein (hereinafter referred as the BRO) in awarding the L...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »