Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sohan Lal @ Sonu Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
$~ 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1529/2013 % Judgment dated 12.12.2013 SOHAN LAL @ SONU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.B. Dandapani, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State along with S.I. Uma Dutt, P.S. Mehrauli. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner herein was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 21.4.2011 and sentenced to undergo RI for 7 years and to pay fine of Rs.3000/- in default thereof two months SI for the offence u/s.394/397 IPC.2. The unexpired portion of sentence of the petitioner as on 27.11.2013 is 6 months and 24 days. The petitioner claims that he was a juvenile on the date of incident and thus he could not have been awarded sentence for more than three years as per section 15 (g) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.3. In response to the notice issued in this petition, the State has filed a ...
Latha M. Palat Vs. Director of Education and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5515/2013 & CM No.16677/2013 12th December, 2013 LATHA M. PALAT Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Mukul Talwar, Adv. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Nidhi Raman for DEO,Zone 26, Central/ R-1 Mr. Ramesh Singh for R-2 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks the relief of quashing of the letter dated 28.6.2013 issued by the respondent no.2/school, by which the respondent no.2 withdrew its earlier letter dated 10.4.2013. Directions are prayed for that the respondent no.2 should implement its letter dated 10.4.2013 and continue the services of the petitioner till the age of 62 years.2. The letters dated 10.4.2013 and 28.6.2013 read as under:No.SS/Per/Adm/2013 W.P.(C) No.5515/2013 OFFICE ORDER Further to the discussions and decision taken in the Executive Committee Meeting held on 14th March,...
Naik Manikandan R Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h November, 2013. % Date of Decision:12th December, 2013 + WP(C) No.6317/2012 NAIK MANIKANDAN R Through: ..... Petitioner Major K. Ramesh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA DEEPA SHARMA, J.1. The petitioner vide this petition has challenged the findings and sentence of the Summary Court Martial dated 15th November, 2010, whereby, the petitioner was sentenced rigorous imprisonment for twenty eight days in military custody and to be reduced to ranks from Havildar to sepoy. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 14th February, 2012 passed by General Officer Commanding in Chief on his statutory petition dated 23rd July, 2011 whereby the punishment was commuted from reduction in rank and 28 days rigorous imprisonment in military custody to severe reprimand. His petition dated 23 July 2011 was...
Om Parkash Gupta and ors. Vs. Yogesh Sharoha and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h December, 2013 % + CMs No.12098/2013 (of the LRs of appellant No.2 u/O22R-3), 12099/2013 (for condonation of 1372 days delay), 12418/2013 (for restoration / readmission) & 13354/2013 (of the legal representative of the appellant No.2 for setting aside of abatement) in RFA No.364-67/2005. OM PARKASH GUPTA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rupesh Kumar & Mr. Aditya Kumar, Advs. for Legal Heirs of Appellant no.2. Mr. S.P. Jha & Mr. Vikrant Bhardwaj, Advs. for Appellant No.4. Versus YOGESH SHAROHA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. B.S. Mor with Mr. Neeraj Mor, Advs. for R-1 &2. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal in which these applications have been filed, was filed impugning the judgment and decree dated 15.02.2005 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi of dismissal of suit No.34/2000 filed by the four original appellants.2. The said suit was filed, for ...
Zile Singh Vs. State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
$~08. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1828/2013 % Judgment dated 12.12.2013 ZILE SINGH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Jai Bansal, Mr.Tarun Satija, Mr.Pushpendra Singh and Mr.Atul Nagrajan, Advs. versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing counsel for State along with Ms.Priyanka Kapoor, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. By the present petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to grant benefit of the statutory provision, as mentioned in Section 428 Cr.P.C., and set off the period of imprisonment already undergone by him as an undertrial prisoner against the term of imprisonment imposed on him or else the petitioner would be forced to languish in jail despite completion of his sentence.2. The necessary facts, to be noticed for disposal of this petition, are that the petitioner herein was convicted in a case arising out of FIR No.201/2007, registered under Sections 397/411/34 IPC...
Ravi Shankar Sharma Vs. Kali Ram Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :28. 11.2013 Date of Decision:12. 12.2013 + RFA(OS) NO.13 OF2013& CMs 1113/2013 & 1114/2013 RAVI SHANKAR SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash Gupta, Advocate. versus KALI RAM SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vipin K.Singh, Advocate for R-3, 4, 7, 9, 11 & 12. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI1 The appellant had, on a claim of hereditary rights, sought partition, possession, rendition of accounts, injunction, etc. of certain properties which he claims were inherited by his father from his grandfather Mr. Tulsi Ram. He had claimed the suit property devolved upon his father and him too by inheritance from his grandfather, who in turn had earlier inherited it from his father (i.e. from the appellants greatgrandfather). It is thus claimed that the suit property was an HUF property because of this hereditary succession of the ancestral property.2....
Suneel Menon @ Mookul Maruthur Suneel Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:12. h DECEMBER, 2013 + CRL.REV.P. 568/2013 & CRL.M.A.17943/2013 SUNEEL MENON @ MOOKUL MARUTHUR SUNEEL..... Petitioner Through Mr. Vikram Choudhary, and Mr. Raktim Gogoi, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Asha Tiwari, APP for the State. Mr. Vikas Arora and Mr. Aneesh Dhingra, Advocates for R-2 + + CRL.REV.P. 575/2013 & CRL.M.A.17942/2013 SUNEEL MENON @ MOOKUL MARUTHUR SUNEEL...... Petitioner Through Mr. Vikram Choudhary, and Mr. Raktim Gogoi, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Asha Tiwari, APP for the State. Mr. Vikas Arora and Mr. Aneesh Dhingra, Advocates for R-2. CRL.REV.P. 580/2013 & CRL.M.A.17943/2013 SUNEEL MENON @ MOOKUL MARUTHUR SUNEEL.... Petitioner Through Mr. Vikram Choudhary, and Mr. Raktim Gogoi, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Asha Tiwari, APP for the State. Mr. Vikas Arora and Mr. Aneesh Dhingra, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS....
Nanhey Khan Vs. Smt. Kala Mehta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h December, 2013. + RFA5222013, & CMs No.17822/2013 (for stay) & 17824/2013 (u/O VI R-17 for leave to amend W.S.) NANHEY KHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. Versus SMT. KALA MEHTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.M. Hasmi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 26 th August, 2013 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ)-01, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Suit No.186/2011 filed by the respondent against the appellant) of recovery of possession from the appellant/defendant of property No.7C/6, Gandhi Park, Hauz Rani, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi.2. The appeal came up for hearing first on 11th November, 2013, when the counsel for the respondent/plaintiff being on caveat, appeared. The appeal was admitted for hearing and the Trial Court record requisitioned. Considering the nature of the controversy and furthe...
Pratap Singh and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.185 of 2013 Decided on :12. h December, 2013 PRATAP SINGH & ORS. Through: Appellants Mr. A.K. Bajpai & Mr. M.F. Khan, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellants under Section 100 CPC against the order dated 28.5.2013 passed by the learned Additional District Judge dismissing the appeal of the appellants being R.C.A. No.87/12/12.2. Briefly stated that facts of the case are that the plaintiffs/appellants who were originally 13 in number filed a suit bearing No.238/2006 in the year 1985 for permanent injunction against Union of India, Delhi Administration, Delhi Development Authority and The Secretary, Land and Building. The case of the appellants was that they were in occupation and absolute possession of agricultural land as tenants bearing khasra No.125 measuring 9 bighas and 18 biswas situated in the revenue esta...
Dr. Atul Bhardwaj Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.33/2013 12th December, 2013 % DR. ATUL BHARDWAJ Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advocate. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Sumit Babar, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) + W.P.(C) No.33/2013 and C.M. No.73/2013 (interim relief) 1. The petitioner by this writ petition, seeks the relief and directions from this Court for quashing of the recruitment process initiated by the respondent no.2/college for appointment to the post of Lecturer of Shalakya Tantra in terms of the advertisement dated 14.12.2012. Petitioner states that since as per the earlier recruitment process with W.P.(C) No.33/2013 page 1 of 14 respect to which advertisement was issued on 9.9.2000 and 19.2.2010 for the very post of Lectu...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »